from baby world.com
Culture or fashion
Ear piercing has long been the subject of controversy but for some, piercing a child's ears has deep-rooted cultural meanings. Evidence of ear-lobe piercing is seen in ancient civilisations dating over 6000 years and many ancient African, Aboriginal and Nordic cultures all pierced their ears.
Hindus hold an ear piercing ceremony known as Karnavedha on babies of both sexes at twelve days old. They believe that the piercing of a hole in the lower lobes of the ear have benefits of acupuncture as well as distracting evil spirits.
Ear piercing is also mentioned in the Bible and for some Christians is said to be a sign of faith. It is normal, for example, for Latin American Christians to routinely pierce baby girls' ears.
As well as cultural reasons, parents may also choose to pierce their baby's ears because of family traditions or, most typically, to identify the baby as a girl. However, some babies have their ears pierced because of the social culture they are born into. The Beckhams, for example, played down tabloid criticism of their decision to pierce their 3-year old son's ears saying that they had it done because they thought it 'looked cute'.
The question that has divided people is whether a parent has the right to make that choice for their child as part of a fashion or social statement.
nothing here tells me a baby needs to have their ears pierced.
Nothing here shows a justified, logical reason to me why a baby/child has to suffer pain becuase of the culture it was born into.
Its all decoration, superstision and outdated tradition.