I tend to be more interested in realpolitik than left right flag waving and because of that was willing to give Burnham a chance. He seemed like more of a conviction politician before taking office.
However things are a-changing.
--
Positives :
I like the idea of increased property taxes and taxes on unearned wealth. History says he is in favour of the increase in property taxes but we'll see whether he does anything over and above what Reeves promised in the forthcoming budget.
Appears at least at the moment to be willing to drill Rosebank and Jackdaw.
Bus policies seem good.
Negatives :
Not happy with his agenda re the EU. Before the by election he appeared to talk down the prospects of rejoining (probably because Makerfield was a leave seat) but afterwards he has been talking up the rejoin potential (although he seems to realise what a shitstorm this has caused and is slowly backtracking from it and appears evasive when questioned). Has talked up the "Russian influence" in the Brexit vote, probably to try to cast doubt on its legitimacy. "Russian influence" could either be one guy behind a desk in Moscow tapping out stuff on the internet or hundreds of thousands of people engaging in net activity. He doesn't seem to be prepared to say which. He really doesn't need to go here.
Not happy with his new "help to keep house prices inflated" policy.
Don't think ending the two child benefit cap was a good idea.
There appears to be some interest in previous relationships he may have been involved with in Manchester.
Electricity VAT removal is expensive and won't encourage fuel efficiency.
Electoral reform for me has always been about gerrymandering.
--
I think the forthcoming budget will be a big decision maker for me on whether his particular brand of realpolitik is something I subscribe to.