Putney Pusher suspect found dead, according to reports

[Fartughtyred]

Goodness me, wasn't expecting that.

You think he's a bad person. The PP wasn't just a bad person. He was way more unusual than thst.

People genuinely think that giving interviews and providing information via social media/general media is a way to test someones guilt or provide criminal evidence, it really is appalling what our society has come to. Literal trial by social media.

i think someone who hits a woman cycling with his motorbike and drives off (proven) and who very likely was in possession of cocaine plus other substances has a massive lack of regard for other people. Yeah. Sadly some people don’t give a shit about trafficking, sexual violence and murder and contribute to the drugs trade.

I’ve no idea if this guy is the ‘Putney pusher.’ Whoever it was is a vile human being.

Strava! They could get his account details from his watch or phone and go back through his account history to see where he was at the time and it would potentially show the change in his path and any speed change as he used energy to push the poor victim. If he thought he'd got away with it, he might not have deleted the run from Strava. I wonder how often Strava is used as evidence...

If the PP was on strava and recording that run he'd have been caught instantly.

I’ve no idea if this guy is the ‘Putney pusher.’

OK, well that's the only thing I GAF about in this thread.

I'm strongly opposed to drug use and driving without due care and attention, but that's not what I'm here for.

I've never worked anywhere where calendar entries were deleted after six months.

And I have worked in two international banks.

I've never heard of this policy. I often have to undertake investigations which means going back through people's calendars and they definitely don't just disappear when I go back 6m. That would be mad.

Probably not kept nine years, and almost definitely not kept after the person has gone though.

I thought this too after the claim of media being invited to the arrest—lessons were meant to have been learned from Cliff Richard. Did the police really do this?

His sisters have claimed it but I've not seen any evidence, which is not to say there is none of course.

Agree if it can be documented to have been the police that's very significant, particularly if it were official rather than someone selling info on the quiet. My other thoughts were it could be the person who reported him, or if he engaged a solicitor then a leak from someone in the firm.

I thought it was interesting they're aiming this at the police, rather than the Daily Mail who chose to publish enough information to identify him.

Exactly my friend, exactly.

Perhaps it's on a "need to know" basis.

So let's apply Hitchen's law. You are asserting that he is guilty without evidence, so we don't need any evidence to dismiss your views.

Or, more likely, you have no evidence.

Okay. So dismiss me. 😂

Yet you just keep on replying and replying... It must be really irritating to you.

I think I'll bow out here. I've kind of lost interest. All the best to you. 😘

Most of the replies to you have come from other people. And no, it is not irritating to me at all, just amusing that someone wants to display their lack of critical thinking by claiming that the evidence is "pretty clear" and that "a smidge of critical thinking generally does the trick". A smidge of critical thinking would tell you that the evidence we've seen is a long way short of proving that he did it.