Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

How is Ariana Grande allowed to keep going?

558 replies

fartotheleftside · 11/06/2026 18:30

She looks like she’s at death’s door with anorexia and yet she’s just kicked off a world tour.

I thought we were living in more enlightened times now and that celebrities’ ill health wouldn’t be enabled like this. If she went to any hospital she’d get admitted for malnutrition.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
29
StartingFreshFor2026 · Yesterday 12:02

MacNCheeze · Yesterday 11:54

That's potentially different. Under the Mental Health Act, you could argue that those people don't have capacity if they refuse to take medication which regulates their condition and they have made explicit threats to harm others.

Interestingly enough (and forgive me if I'm wrong) but when Kanye West was posting on social media to let the world know which school his kids were attending (thereby potentially putting them in serious danger) and promoting and spewing hatred online (which can result in physical harm or danger to others), I didn't see many people calling for him to be subject to a psychiatric hold yet given the circumstances, he was probably a far better candidate for it than Ariana Grande is.

I heard loads of people advocating for a psychiatric hold for Kanye West.

Mental capacity can be affected in several serious mental illnesses, including depression and anorexia.

The pp seemed to be suggesting sectioning should never occur under any circumstances.

MacNCheeze · Yesterday 12:08

StartingFreshFor2026 · Yesterday 12:02

I heard loads of people advocating for a psychiatric hold for Kanye West.

Mental capacity can be affected in several serious mental illnesses, including depression and anorexia.

The pp seemed to be suggesting sectioning should never occur under any circumstances.

It's allowed in exceptional cases but it is just that, exceptional.

I would argue that if you pose a threat to others and you have made threats to kill, you are not taking medication etc., then there is justification if it can be evidenced.

XelaM · Yesterday 12:25

MacNCheeze · Yesterday 12:08

It's allowed in exceptional cases but it is just that, exceptional.

I would argue that if you pose a threat to others and you have made threats to kill, you are not taking medication etc., then there is justification if it can be evidenced.

The guy who went to the Tate gallery and threw a random child off the 10th floor probably had social workers with similar sentiments to yours because they also didn't want to section him.

How can you possibly know if someone poses a threat to others (unless they explicitly tell you which is unlikely) until it's too late?!?

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 12:32

MacNCheeze · Yesterday 12:08

It's allowed in exceptional cases but it is just that, exceptional.

I would argue that if you pose a threat to others and you have made threats to kill, you are not taking medication etc., then there is justification if it can be evidenced.

Sectioning is very frequently for psychosis.

Disallowing it for anything else wouldn’t have much impact numbers wise but would mean people who need help don’t get it.

I mean, Psychiatrists know better than you, right?

Tickingcrocodile · Yesterday 12:52

Unfortunately society glamourises thinness to an extent that AG's obvious health issues will probably be overlooked. When my daughter was in the throes of a serious eating disorder, staff at school were overheard to say she had had "a glow up" 😠.

JacketPotatoFoodOfTheGods · Yesterday 13:36

TalkToTheHand123 · Yesterday 10:29

I wouldn't say she looked anorexic just slim like Victoria Beckham or Cheryl Tweedy.

Ffs

SurreySenMum26 · Yesterday 13:49

Tickingcrocodile · Yesterday 12:52

Unfortunately society glamourises thinness to an extent that AG's obvious health issues will probably be overlooked. When my daughter was in the throes of a serious eating disorder, staff at school were overheard to say she had had "a glow up" 😠.

I think that's the crux of it and its not going to change. I still see daily Shein adverts on here and SM where they are heavily photo shopped.

If you was asked 'do you want your waist to half the width of your foot lenght?' You would think wtf? But still that's the look being pushed onto us

How is Ariana Grande allowed to keep going?
TalkToTheHand123 · Yesterday 14:05

LethargeMarg · Yesterday 11:56

Anorexia is a mental illness so you cannot technically say someone has an eating disorder based on how they look. However being as emaciated as Ariana unless she has another medical condition, being this underweight is almost definitely due to malnourishment caused by severe restriction of food.
and tbh regardless of the whys being this underweight is a huge risk to the heart, brain and other organs so very dangerous to be performing at thus level.

To clarify for you, I'm saying she doesn't look underweight, just very slim.

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 14:09

TalkToTheHand123 · Yesterday 14:05

To clarify for you, I'm saying she doesn't look underweight, just very slim.

But that’s a stupid thing to say

YellowElephant5 · Yesterday 14:22

We don't section fat people. How is it different?

YellowElephant5 · Yesterday 14:23

I affirm...if they aren't at a risk of hurting others...leave them alone.

PigletTwiglet · Yesterday 14:27

TalkToTheHand123 · Yesterday 14:05

To clarify for you, I'm saying she doesn't look underweight, just very slim.

If not a protruding collarbone and overly prominent ribs, then I’m genuinely curious to know exactly what you would class as someone looking underweight? It’s very obvious to me that Ariana is unwell, but then I have experience of being on an eating disorders unit where many of the patients looked exactly like what I’m currently seeing on a worrying number of celebrities: too-thin bodies, forced smiles, sad eyes. Ariana reminds me very much of a young girl I knew from there who died in her sleep from heart failure, very unexpectedly. I don’t usually care enough about celebrity culture to comment on these things, and perhaps it’s the history that I have, but I find all of this terrifying; and the casual acceptance and normalisation of it all is perhaps most frightening of all.

ruethewhirl · Yesterday 14:32

YellowElephant5 · Yesterday 14:23

I affirm...if they aren't at a risk of hurting others...leave them alone.

Even if they are hurting themselves?

ruethewhirl · Yesterday 14:33

Tickingcrocodile · Yesterday 12:52

Unfortunately society glamourises thinness to an extent that AG's obvious health issues will probably be overlooked. When my daughter was in the throes of a serious eating disorder, staff at school were overheard to say she had had "a glow up" 😠.

That's terrible! I hope your daughter is doing better now.

KeepPumping · Yesterday 14:58

30DaysOnlyMH · 13/06/2026 21:01

For women of a certain age, we’re dreading a Karen Carpenter repeat.

Or Lena Zavaroni , who was a top level vocalist, even as a child.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8sewohu2qI

JacketPotatoFoodOfTheGods · Yesterday 14:59

YellowElephant5 · Yesterday 14:22

We don't section fat people. How is it different?

Don’t be ridiculous

BringBackCatsEyes · Yesterday 15:34

YellowElephant5 · Yesterday 14:22

We don't section fat people. How is it different?

While there may be an underlying MH issue to explain why someone is very large, it is unlikely they are so entrenched in an eating disorder that they have lost mental capacity.
Do you not understand how a Section works?

LemonadeisbetterCloudy · Yesterday 15:42

BringBackCatsEyes · Yesterday 15:34

While there may be an underlying MH issue to explain why someone is very large, it is unlikely they are so entrenched in an eating disorder that they have lost mental capacity.
Do you not understand how a Section works?

Exactly this ^
as another poster pointed you'd essentially be comparing somebody who is so obese they can barely get off the sofa/bed-bound, not your average overweight member of the public.

Corvidsarethebest · Yesterday 17:34

TalkToTheHand123 · Yesterday 14:05

To clarify for you, I'm saying she doesn't look underweight, just very slim.

I disagree, I've already explained why on this thread- it's in the face, especially around the mouth, because the muscles on the face start to change and you get the very tight/pronounced lines around the mouth which are characteristic of your body being very distressed indeed.

You are right it isn't about the size of any particular limb and some people are just pretty skinny or running underweight their whole lives.

What you need to be looking for is muscle loss, hair thinning, hair on arms (languno), I'm not going to go through the signs for bulimia but you do see them on famous people and they are well-known.

if you know, you know I've spent a lot of time on ED wards and I am 100% sure AG is very unwell.

fartotheleftside · Yesterday 17:35

It’s so weird to come on here to talk about someone being ill with an eating disorder and have to face a barrage of comments about fat people or clearly unwell people not being underweight…some people on here have serious issues

OP posts:
Fizbosshoes · Yesterday 17:48

SurreySenMum26 · Yesterday 13:49

I think that's the crux of it and its not going to change. I still see daily Shein adverts on here and SM where they are heavily photo shopped.

If you was asked 'do you want your waist to half the width of your foot lenght?' You would think wtf? But still that's the look being pushed onto us

The thing is on here (MN) if ever anyone posts a similar pic or questions whether a model is either photoshopped, or, if genuine - whether thats a normal healthy weight, posters are falling over themselves to say they look exactly like that and are 5'10, and naturally a size 0 , they are really healthy and strong, love fruit and vegetables and eat cakes once a year, and that any comment on someone who is extremely thin is body-shaming.
I think theres a lot of disordered eating and disordered thinking on MN...

SurreySenMum26 · Yesterday 18:36

Fizbosshoes · Yesterday 17:48

The thing is on here (MN) if ever anyone posts a similar pic or questions whether a model is either photoshopped, or, if genuine - whether thats a normal healthy weight, posters are falling over themselves to say they look exactly like that and are 5'10, and naturally a size 0 , they are really healthy and strong, love fruit and vegetables and eat cakes once a year, and that any comment on someone who is extremely thin is body-shaming.
I think theres a lot of disordered eating and disordered thinking on MN...

Well I agree. My dd aged 11 does gym, Ballet, musical theatre, swims, horse rides, athletics club and gardening. She fits into age 10-11 clothes AND Holliter / Primark size 6. She is also 147 tall and weighs a full stone more than mil and a few pounds less than her 5,8 22 year brother. Unless dd is in fact obese, none of this is normal. I simply do not see adult women routinely smaller than my dd. Even a local actress ( who all seem to be slight) isn't the size of dd. Even if they did have her 21" waist they are mostly a foot taller. If she was a size zero I'd be under socail care investigation or she would be under a Dr for the reason.

She is the height and weight of a standard 10 year old

YellowElephant5 · Yesterday 23:07

I fundamentally will not accept that a grown adult who isn't harming anyone else and who is paying her bills and meeting obligations should be able to have their freedom and liberty stripped from them for other people's concerns. It simply doesn't work for me. I think it's wrong. I'll always think it's wrong.

YellowElephant5 · Yesterday 23:08

They are adults. They should be allowed to make their own decisions. Period.

fartotheleftside · Yesterday 23:09

YellowElephant5 · Yesterday 23:07

I fundamentally will not accept that a grown adult who isn't harming anyone else and who is paying her bills and meeting obligations should be able to have their freedom and liberty stripped from them for other people's concerns. It simply doesn't work for me. I think it's wrong. I'll always think it's wrong.

The criteria for sectioning is a danger to self or others.

anorexia is a mental illness, people who are starving themselves to death aren’t in their right minds and deserve a chance to recover.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread