Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Belfast attack

1000 replies

Greenwitchart · 09/06/2026 17:51

I can see that the previous thread on the topic is full so I am starting a new one to continue the discussion.

The points I wanted to say as someone who immigrated to the UK over 30 years ago:

  • This is a horrific attack and everyone's thoughts should be with the victim and his loved one.
  • However, I do think that we have an issue with some people getting into the country whether legally or illegally who simply don't have the same values as the majority of the population and are not able to follow its laws and customs.
  • The asylum and immigration system needs a serious overall and to do more to stop men who are a potential danger to society because of their beliefs/culture/failure to integrate getting through the system and ending up committing violent acts. Some people destroy their documents and checks can only go so far when it is hard to verify claims and the chaotic countries they come from does not have reliable records that can be accessed . There are many peaceful and genuine asylum seekers who just want a safe place to live in peace but we seem to be getting in too many angry, violent men who abuse the system and that has to stop.
  • I don't want to share the streets with people who have no respect for women and girls, are religious fanatics to the point of extremism or show hate towards gay people and bring violence in general.
  • Having people from different cultures coming in is fine as long as they integrate well and take on the values of the country they live in. It does not work if they just live parallel lives and fail to follow the law of the land.
OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
EasternStandard · 10/06/2026 07:45

number1of7 · 10/06/2026 07:43

This. Immigration is a source of business now. This is the real issue. Lawyers specialising in immigration, immigration “specialists”, big businesses owning asylum seeker accommodation, whole sections of councils dedicated to enabling these people to claim what they are “entitled” to, charities with CEO’s on big packages, - it’s now a whole section of our economy and a valuable skim of taxpayer money for those involved. It’s not about pulling up the drawbridge - why should someone who has been a migrant have to be in favour of seemingly uncontrolled migration because they benefited from being allowed to come, - that makes no sense - each case should be judged on its merits having regard to the whole picture at the relevant time. economically some serious questions need answering.

Yes it’s a massive business with many making a living from it. People will push hard against it ending.

Paravion011 · 10/06/2026 07:46

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 10/06/2026 07:47

Lavender14 · 10/06/2026 07:43

I'm not telling you what you can see but I'm going to tell you a trip to specsavers might be in order...

I’d maybe take your own advice. Just a suggestion.

EasternStandard · 10/06/2026 07:47

Lavender14 · 10/06/2026 07:32

Do you know the perpetrator?

I don't and haven't seen any information released about his mental state. So could you cite your source that makes you think he wasn't vulnerable?

I mean I'd argue that anyone who is an asylum seeker is vulnerable in that capacity but right now we don't actually know if this was an act of extremism or a psychotic break or a ptsd induced psychosis.

Perhaps he was just simply depraved or perhaps he'd been exposed to extremism. But without any facts released on that you're making assumptions too early doors.

How did he pass the checks?

Vivaea · 10/06/2026 07:48

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 10/06/2026 07:35

Ahhh the old “People commit crimes anyway so why bother trying to stop them” trope

Umm no, that’s not what I said. You said no-one should be allowed in if we can’t guarantee they’re not going to commit crime. I’m just following your logic.

oliviaAustin · 10/06/2026 07:48

Lavender14 · 10/06/2026 01:50

Do you realise that the majority of people seeking asylum and refugees don't go to Europe? 66% of refugees stay as close to their home country as possible and settle in a border country.

So the ones that are leaving to risk their lives in a small boat, to pay a small fortune to be trafficked and abused on the way - they're going to do whatever they can to get to a safe country.

And while some people may consider Europe safe, conditions for people seeking asylum and refugees are incredibly hostile in some other eu countries and funnily enough people aren't content with living in mass refugee centres. I wouldn't be either so I can't blame them.

So the Rwanda plan is never going to work.

"So the policeman should be feeling sympathy for the perp? I think most of us will save our sympathy for the victim"

I think most people can understand that there are individuals who carry out violent crimes as a direct result of their own vulnerabilities or illness. That doesn't exclude you from being able to feel sympathy for a victim of a violent crime. I'm not speculating as to the attack yesterday because we don't have the information to do that yet, but I mean in general. If police can't understand the link between trauma/ mental illness and violent crime then they absolutely are not doing their jobs properly. They get enough training that they should be able to understand it.

I'm not sure why you think we'd need to rescue all of Sudan. We only need to provide asylum for the most vulnerable who met the remit for asylum protection. Most people in Sudan or countries with similar difficulties will never have the means to leave or will go to a neighbouring country. Not to mention that we share responsibility with all the other countries in the world. We take in a very small percentage of the world's refugees. Even if our media likes to present it very differently.

They pick the UK because it’s heavily marketed by traffickers. Know why? It’s one of the most expensive routes and they want more money. These people are being taken advantage of for their payment and traffickers will continue to target UK. We need to cut the traffickers cash off.

SomedayIllBeSaturdayNight · 10/06/2026 07:49

Lavender14 · 10/06/2026 07:41

I don't just believe there are good ones among them I know many personally so I know there to be from direct personal experience.

If someone said to me, Mon and do xyz but you'll need to wear dark clothes, a mask and prepare to be arrested and ask businesses will need to shut or else I'd say I'd be staying home thanks because that sounds pretty fucking illegal and like you're going to hurt person or property.

People went out fully informed on what was going to happen last night and they emboldened rioters and those who took part in targeted violence against migrant families in the process. And they did that knowingly. You'd need to be pretty naieve in this country to have expected that to be peaceful with the flyers and texts that were widespread. So I'm sorry but there is accountability due there.

Totally agree. And it is the attitudes like the ones on this thread that enabled people to believe that violent behaviour like this is in any way acceptable.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 10/06/2026 07:49

Lavender14 · 10/06/2026 07:41

I don't just believe there are good ones among them I know many personally so I know there to be from direct personal experience.

If someone said to me, Mon and do xyz but you'll need to wear dark clothes, a mask and prepare to be arrested and ask businesses will need to shut or else I'd say I'd be staying home thanks because that sounds pretty fucking illegal and like you're going to hurt person or property.

People went out fully informed on what was going to happen last night and they emboldened rioters and those who took part in targeted violence against migrant families in the process. And they did that knowingly. You'd need to be pretty naieve in this country to have expected that to be peaceful with the flyers and texts that were widespread. So I'm sorry but there is accountability due there.

I do believe that the risk of them only going to commit violent acts is too high to condone it.

I also think the risk of violence is too high for adult male asylum seekers to be permitted to come here.

I’m not tribal.

LizzieW1969 · 10/06/2026 07:50

Hypercatalectic · 09/06/2026 20:04

I do think there’s an issue with migration from countries where there’s been brutal and long-lasting wars. Some of these people will be severely traumatised and will be unable to live a peaceful life somewhere, the scars will be with them always.
I don’t doubt that the man charged with attempted murder is severely mentally unwell. I look at some of the other incidents by asylum seekers and think the same, not to excuse but to explain.
I think it’s something we have to take into consideration when looking at the overall population - many of whom we are currently unable to support with their mental health problems - before adding large numbers of traumatised men to the mix.

This is a very good point. Not nearly enough consideration has been paid to this.

BackToLurk · 10/06/2026 07:50

Flyingintotheunknown · 10/06/2026 07:41

Everywhere on this thread. But of course here comes the denial and gaslighting from you!
You have no argument to put across other than accusing people of generalising when you yourself, along with many others are generalising people as racists for being angry. So carry on spewing your ilk, it means naff all!

Try again. I’m specifically differentiating between discussing immigration and asylum and using those discussions to generalise about particular groups. You don’t think such generalisations are racist. Fine. Just say that. It’s ok that you don’t know a word for it.

Lavender14 · 10/06/2026 07:50

Flyingintotheunknown · 10/06/2026 07:42

But poor Henry Nowak and the guy in Belfast weren’t racist attacks then! But people like you run to these threads to defend them when people get angry. Disgusting!

If you can't tell the difference between violence and racist violence I'm not sure anyone can help you.

There's been nothing (that I've read anyway yet so happy to be linked to correct) to suggest that Henry or the man attacked last night were specifically targeted due to their skin colour was there? Obviously the police response to Henry's attack was racially motivated and very problematic but as for the motivation for perpetrators themselves I don't think that's been made public yet, at least not in the case of last night. That might come out later to be the case I'm just saying I've not read anything clarifying that yet. And I think it's really important when we're discussing horrific incidents like these that we are dealing in fact rather than assumptions.

Flyingintotheunknown · 10/06/2026 07:50

oliviaAustin · 10/06/2026 07:48

They pick the UK because it’s heavily marketed by traffickers. Know why? It’s one of the most expensive routes and they want more money. These people are being taken advantage of for their payment and traffickers will continue to target UK. We need to cut the traffickers cash off.

If that poster cannot see that people smugglers are now operating ‘services’ from Belgium as well as France then they have no right to tell other people to go to specsavers! The whole “asylum by boat” is a con!

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 10/06/2026 07:50

Flyingintotheunknown · 10/06/2026 07:41

Everywhere on this thread. But of course here comes the denial and gaslighting from you!
You have no argument to put across other than accusing people of generalising when you yourself, along with many others are generalising people as racists for being angry. So carry on spewing your ilk, it means naff all!

Are you able to clarify exactly why you do not think it's racist to set fire to the houses of innocent people simply because they happen to share a similar skin colour to the perpetrator of a horrific crime? I mean, can you actually answer the question instead of trying to deflect away from it?

Surely this is the very definition of racism. People are angry, yes, but they are directing their anger towards innocent individuals who had nothing to do with the horrific attack in Belfast, and they are targeting those individuals because of their race. How is that not racist?

RonniePickering · 10/06/2026 07:51

People don’t want to accept the violence of someone from a country which our own government tells us not to travel to. So racist 🤡

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 10/06/2026 07:51

Vivaea · 10/06/2026 07:48

Umm no, that’s not what I said. You said no-one should be allowed in if we can’t guarantee they’re not going to commit crime. I’m just following your logic.

No.
We can’t let them in if we can’t guarantee they have no recorded previous criminal history.

Same as for teachers.

Same as for doctors.

You know, basic safeguarding policies.

Flyingintotheunknown · 10/06/2026 07:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Ginnyweasleyswand · 10/06/2026 07:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Flyingintotheunknown · 10/06/2026 07:53

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It’s always the same with the left lot… nothing and I mean nothing they can say to argue their case on here will stand up while they are defending criminals against angry people…. Because racist!

Ginnyweasleyswand · 10/06/2026 07:53

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 10/06/2026 07:51

No.
We can’t let them in if we can’t guarantee they have no recorded previous criminal history.

Same as for teachers.

Same as for doctors.

You know, basic safeguarding policies.

Agree.

How many people have to die or be mutilated? The politicians are choosing these violent men who it's obvious are probably criminal if they've come illegally and ditched their papers over the people already here. It's a choice.

BackToLurk · 10/06/2026 07:55

Flyingintotheunknown · 10/06/2026 07:42

But poor Henry Nowak and the guy in Belfast weren’t racist attacks then! But people like you run to these threads to defend them when people get angry. Disgusting!

Who’s defended the attackers. The only violent thugs I see being defended are the ones setting fire to people’s homes. I’d have thought you’d want to distance yourself from them.

Forestgreenblue · 10/06/2026 07:56

It’s not racist to state that many of the illegal immigrants that enter the country are male or do not follow the laws or have the same values as British nationals, or even the same as legal migrants. It’s simply stating facts

There’s a huge difference between legal and illegal migration. I know a lot of legal migrant families - I grew up with one girl whose family are Indian migrants (doctors - they raised a family of doctors), my daughter is best friends with a Romanian boy, we’ve got an African family next door. All lovely. All legal and professionally working. This isn’t an issue of race.

It’s been proven by various court cases - including a rape case of an illegal migrant near to my home town where the person stated that rape is normal ‘where they came from’.

Im scared for my kids. I’m scared as a grown adult female. There’s woodlands near our home I used to feel safe walking through with my dogs - now my DP has banned either myself or our children going there alone. Our small home town has now become a worry. There’s a huge influx of immigrants in our area - many that loiter in park areas where our teens generally hang out with friends too. Why are grown men hanging around here? I’ve had conversations with my 12 year old that I can genuinely say my mother didn’t need to have with me over 30 years ago.

If they completely stopped any financial support or turned them right back around when they arrive on boats then this would stop them - I’d be more than happy for my tax money to be spent funding large safe boats for their return back to France - after all they are deliberately failing in their attempt to stop them crossing to get rid of them as their problem

Flyingintotheunknown · 10/06/2026 07:57

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Lavender14 · 10/06/2026 07:58

oliviaAustin · 10/06/2026 07:48

They pick the UK because it’s heavily marketed by traffickers. Know why? It’s one of the most expensive routes and they want more money. These people are being taken advantage of for their payment and traffickers will continue to target UK. We need to cut the traffickers cash off.

Of course we do, I'm not for free and open immigration either. But we currently only have two other countries in the world where people can make a claim for asylum in the UK before arriving here.

We are the ones not leaving people any alternative route in so we are enabling those traffickers by refusing to provide free, monitored and safe access routes.

Most people who come by trafficking will be seriously abused on the way or asked to provide additional money at a vulnerable stage. They are utterly exploited in the process to be handed a non sea worthy craft and make it here on a hope and a prayer. Many other countries that are sea facing practice illegal pushbacks which is a big part of the reason why the UK is targeted. I'll never condone that because we know those crafts are not fit for purpose and that would mean leaving people to drown.

So unless we overhaul our immigration system, create more appropriate pathways for genuine people to access asylum here then we are never going to tackle the traffickers. I'd have a much more lenient view of deportation etc if we had alternative routes in the first place. But as it stands we leave people no other option.

Vivaea · 10/06/2026 07:59

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 10/06/2026 07:51

No.
We can’t let them in if we can’t guarantee they have no recorded previous criminal history.

Same as for teachers.

Same as for doctors.

You know, basic safeguarding policies.

Yeah that’s a reasonable point and I’d agree. We need proper criminal record checks.

Legal migration requires all of this by the way - it’s an involved process with lots of requirements to hit and hoops to jump through. As it should be.

I’d only point out that even with a clean criminal check, you can never absolutely guarantee that person isn’t going to commit a crime.

BackToLurk · 10/06/2026 08:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Again nope. Haven’t ever defended an attacker. Unlike you, who seem remarkably comfortable with people burning down black migrants’ homes.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.