Starmer seems too stunned by political events to lead much.
I’ve mused out loud on here before about Starmer’s psychology and personality. Sorry, I just can’t help it. He’s such an interesting study of a man who is so clearly unsuited to the job he schemed and pushed for.
It can’t be much fun being an objectively, embarrassingly terrible PM and being known universally in chat and song as “a wanker”. So why did he aim for it and why does he cling on like a limpet?
I recently heard somebody on the telly say that Starmer had always succeeded - education, music, sport, legal career - and he doesn’t have the insight to understand that he is really a very, very limited politician. I think there’s something in that.
But I’d express it a bit differently. Starmer’s major success has been in a very narrow field: I suspect that his time as a KC and DPP gave him a massively over-inflated view of himself and his ability. Which has blinded him to his severe limitations as a broader thinker and political manager. This lack of self-awareness, together with his horrible ambition, means we’ve ended up with a politically talentless nobody as PM, who’s cursed by being deaf to criticism and advice. He’s stunned now because he just can’t grasp that he’s useless.
An equally interesting question is why Labour MPs and supporters actually believed in Starmer in the first place - and some still do! You really have to turn a blind eye to his woeful judgement, his glaring evasions, his petulance, his nasty self-serving behaviour, his awful way of talking and the absence of any talent for inspiring voters, to have any belief in him at all.
Or perhaps there really is no-one better in Labour. 🤦♀️