Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread gallery
98
logicisall · 12/04/2026 15:36

RedTagAlan · 12/04/2026 13:12

The normal 2 lanes are 2 miles wide from what I see. One on the Iran side, one on the Oman side. Iran has put a map out with new lanes, both on the Iran side. A big danger area marked out on the Oman side.

I believe the Oman side is much shallower, so the tankers etc have to use the Iranian side.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 15:47

zantez · 12/04/2026 15:22

I don't like the sound of this blocking of the SOH by the US. At all. For the first time (with due respect for those injured and killed so far), I am feeling nervous about the trajectory of this.

I hope I am overreacting. Really do.

The countries in the ME can bypass the SoH if they work together. So Trump will also have to strongarm them.

Now they have seen how strong his arms are, I don't know it would deter them.

RedTagAlan · 12/04/2026 15:47

logicisall · 12/04/2026 15:36

I believe the Oman side is much shallower, so the tankers etc have to use the Iranian side.

That complicates things. Is it empties in, full out ? But deep draft full cargo and container ships would need to use the Iranian side to get in because they are delivering not collecting ?

Why is everything so bloody complicated :-)

How does Trump manage to process all these complex things ?

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 15:51

UnluckyWalnut · 12/04/2026 15:35

Iran need the strait to ship their oil

Edited

To who ?

Or whom ?

Remember there are sanctions against Iran.

RafaistheKingofClay · 12/04/2026 15:51

Can’t he just declare victory a few more times and be done with it?

I was going to book flights home for June. It’s not looking hopeful is it? Will we still have jet fuel by then?

logicisall · 12/04/2026 16:02

namechangedtemporarily123 · 12/04/2026 14:29

Can someone explain to me the strategy of blockading a Strait that’s already blocked? I know it’s to stop other countries paying a toll, but they could be blockading this thing for years? Genuinely confused, happy to have it explained to me.

There are two strategies at play. The first is PR/propaganda playing to a US audience, midterms etc and most importantly keeping Magats on side. Trump needs a win.

The second is Trump trying to find an off ramp. Control of the SoH is Iran's ace, but it also needs to sell its oil to finance war/economy, so taking the SoH will hurt Iran financially at a time when its assets are also frozen. Which might force them to the negotiated peace table etc.

Re countries paying a toll. Apparently this has been done in the currency which must not be named. Totally untraceable. If I were Iran, I would secretly contract with interested parties to not launch a drone or two while their tankers were passing through, while letting the US think they're successfully policing it.

How the US intends to actually do the blockade is a 'watch this space' answer.

zantez · 12/04/2026 16:02

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 15:47

The countries in the ME can bypass the SoH if they work together. So Trump will also have to strongarm them.

Now they have seen how strong his arms are, I don't know it would deter them.

How would other countries do that without conflict etc.? They can't bring the oil overland 😊

I confess to not having a clue about the politics or logistics but could marine traffic/oil tankers get out via the Suez Canal and would Egypt oblige?

Edited, bet that made you all laugh. I was looking at the wrong part of the map. No Suez Canal. But caravans across the desert maybe.

Sorry to be so flippant about this very serious matter.

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 16:03

Re countries paying a toll. Apparently this has been done in the currency which must not be named. Totally untraceable.

Not necessarily true.

Talkinpeace · 12/04/2026 16:05

zantez · 12/04/2026 16:02

How would other countries do that without conflict etc.? They can't bring the oil overland 😊

I confess to not having a clue about the politics or logistics but could marine traffic/oil tankers get out via the Suez Canal and would Egypt oblige?

Edited, bet that made you all laugh. I was looking at the wrong part of the map. No Suez Canal. But caravans across the desert maybe.

Sorry to be so flippant about this very serious matter.

Edited

They will completely pipeline the oil overland

From one side of Saudi to the other
and from the UAE to Sohar in Oman

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 12/04/2026 16:05

UnluckyWalnut · 12/04/2026 14:52

No. Obviously not.

I don't think it's obvious at all. He is a demented egomaniac to whom no-one in the West except Spain and Pope Leo XIV seems to be able to say no.

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 16:06

Sorry to be so flippant about this very serious matter.

Doesn't worry me 😂

DancingFerret · 12/04/2026 16:06

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 12/04/2026 16:05

I don't think it's obvious at all. He is a demented egomaniac to whom no-one in the West except Spain and Pope Leo XIV seems to be able to say no.

He's so obviously demented it's hard to see why impeachment would fail.

logicisall · 12/04/2026 16:07

Talkinpeace · 12/04/2026 13:11

It appears that Saudi have re opened their pipeline to the Red Sea
The UAE's one to Oman is up and running.
Qatar's gas is still an issue, but gas ships are smaller

Re Saudi. That could explain the Pakistani fighter jets' presence as per their defence pact

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 16:08

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 12/04/2026 16:05

I don't think it's obvious at all. He is a demented egomaniac to whom no-one in the West except Spain and Pope Leo XIV seems to be able to say no.

I am probably being unfair, but my impression is that Pope Leo has been more forthright in the past month than Pius-the-whatever was for the entirety of WW2.

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 16:09

logicisall · 12/04/2026 16:07

Re Saudi. That could explain the Pakistani fighter jets' presence as per their defence pact

Pakistan doing what the US can't ?

zantez · 12/04/2026 16:10

Talkinpeace · 12/04/2026 16:05

They will completely pipeline the oil overland

From one side of Saudi to the other
and from the UAE to Sohar in Oman

I wonder if any of that infrastructure is in place, or is yet to be installed.

I'd have thought there was some sort of an alternative way all along, but hadn't a clue if there was or not TBH. Surely these countries would have contingency plans for just such an event as this.

Anyway, the situation is terrible. I don't know what the outcome will be and it's the fear of the unknown that's the worst.

logicisall · 12/04/2026 16:10

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 13:39

The FT article upthread noted that an alternative to the SoH is not a technical problem. Just a political one that needs all the ME states/countries😀 to work together.

If only there was a precedent or example for how a load of countries might engage together to made trade easier for each other and thus themselves richer,.

If only.

This war might have the unintended consequence of doing exactly that.

Wipeywipey · 12/04/2026 16:11

logicisall · 12/04/2026 16:10

This war might have the unintended consequence of doing exactly that.

It already has us looking to EU over US via Stamer, which is something we all thought would take decades post Brexit.

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 12/04/2026 16:12

RafaistheKingofClay · 12/04/2026 15:18

Stupid fucker might actually start WW3.

I've been saying that for 10 years, always in the hope of being proven wrong thanks to those famous checks and balances of the US Constitution. Pah.

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 12/04/2026 16:14

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 16:08

I am probably being unfair, but my impression is that Pope Leo has been more forthright in the past month than Pius-the-whatever was for the entirety of WW2.

Hitler was a Catholic. QED.

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 16:14

zantez · 12/04/2026 16:10

I wonder if any of that infrastructure is in place, or is yet to be installed.

I'd have thought there was some sort of an alternative way all along, but hadn't a clue if there was or not TBH. Surely these countries would have contingency plans for just such an event as this.

Anyway, the situation is terrible. I don't know what the outcome will be and it's the fear of the unknown that's the worst.

My understanding is a lot of the infrastructure is sort of in place.

The reason it hasn't been done before is because the ME can be like cats in a sack. However, when a rather dozy lion rears it's head, they suddenly find out they can work together. It's called political alignment for economic gains. They might call it something like the "Middle East Economic Community" or MEEC to begin with

UnluckyWalnut · 12/04/2026 16:15

SerendipityJane · 12/04/2026 15:51

To who ?

Or whom ?

Remember there are sanctions against Iran.

Quote

Iran sells the vast majority of its oil—roughly 80% to 90%—to China, which serves as its primary, crucial buyer, particularly through independent "teapot" refineries that often use a "shadow fleet" to circumvent US sanctions. Other smaller, notable, or historically recorded, buyers of Iranian oil include Syria, the United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, and occasionally India.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.