Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread gallery
98
Spandauer · 10/04/2026 09:04

Some info here:
www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/10/islamabad-pakistan-negotiations-iran-us

Vance will be there so presumably he's now hoping to garner brownie points for saving the day/world.

OP posts:
Justdancevance · 10/04/2026 09:11

Vance comes across as an arrogant shit, I can’t imagine the Iranians will deal with him either.

logicisall · 10/04/2026 09:30

Justdancevance · 10/04/2026 09:11

Vance comes across as an arrogant shit, I can’t imagine the Iranians will deal with him either.

Add 'self-serving' and I'll agree 100%

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

DuncinToffee · 10/04/2026 09:57

logicisall · 10/04/2026 04:04

I've come to the conclusion that 'other threads' are not worth the effort when the same poster(s) keep dropping an article as an answer without any comment, or analysis because they expect you to do the work of unpicking the points being made.
'Google it' when they run out of rebuttals, is also not an answer.
@DuncinToffee and other regulars on this thread,💐but you really deserve a whole flower shop for yesterday.

Haha, that 'google it' was funny

notimagain · 10/04/2026 10:05

JackieLeeOhmyDarlinNsoul · 10/04/2026 07:58

14 years of underfunding by the conservatives.
That doesn't suddenly get turned round also the cuts to personnel.

...ah here we go.... "but the Tories".

I did not say it could be turned around suddenly or say the state of UK defences is.just down to Labour..

Both Tories and Labour (and to some degree the voters) are to blame when it comes to the state of the UK's armed forces, but as far as the present incumbents go the DIP is their baby and maybe the current HMG ought to get that sorted out PDQ,

If they can't even manage that then promises of increased defence spending are meaningless.

SerendipityJane · 10/04/2026 10:14

MsJinks · 10/04/2026 07:12

I still can’t understand how Catholics can justify being annoyed at the Pope - he’s not just an elected leader (which we could all argue means nada about fitness now!) but he’s the successor of St Peter etc to Catholics - so it’s surely against your Catholic faith not to respect him for that?

That’s a bit confusing ha - anyway, from my memory of RE/Sunday school/general life in a basically Christian based country - his views are hardly wild or radical and just fit with biblical teachings.

I just don’t know how they manage the disconnect between the head of their church and the head of their country - the church I think should outweigh the country for them? I would think it may be most awkward for Vance - if I believed in his ‘faith’ in anything but ‘Vance’!

I’m not religious but I do like this Pope calling them out though and also do believe that surely that’s part of his actual job - it’s also good I think, as country leaders are not perhaps as free to do this.

A lot have Catholics have felt for a while that there was too much Jesus in Christianity.

JoshLymanSwagger · 10/04/2026 10:18

JackieLeeOhmyDarlinNsoul · 10/04/2026 07:58

14 years of underfunding by the conservatives.
That doesn't suddenly get turned round also the cuts to personnel.

The "End of the Cold War" caused all of us - UK, EU and some US spending to drop massively.

Who could have predicted Putin and Trump (and others) turning up and deciding they were bored and wanted to play with a box of matches while standing over a big bucket of petrol.

logicisall · 10/04/2026 10:21

notimagain · 10/04/2026 10:05

...ah here we go.... "but the Tories".

I did not say it could be turned around suddenly or say the state of UK defences is.just down to Labour..

Both Tories and Labour (and to some degree the voters) are to blame when it comes to the state of the UK's armed forces, but as far as the present incumbents go the DIP is their baby and maybe the current HMG ought to get that sorted out PDQ,

If they can't even manage that then promises of increased defence spending are meaningless.

TBH, I don't care who did what in the past, I just want a more detailed plan for moving forward. There's no doubt that this and next gov'ts will have to grasp the thorny issue of how to finance the spending needed to balance defence and social security aims. Let's hope interest rates fall to make gov't borrowing less painful.

SerendipityJane · 10/04/2026 10:29

A thousand words

Depraved, Desperate, Deluded and Dangerous - Trump Thread #160
SerendipityJane · 10/04/2026 10:34

The Trump effect ?

Depraved, Desperate, Deluded and Dangerous - Trump Thread #160
PerkingFaintly · 10/04/2026 10:49

placemats · 10/04/2026 01:03

I remember bits about the Opus when living in Ireland - we knew someone very wealthy who was a member. Weird organisation.

Yes, "weird" until you realise they're very wealthy and deadly serious; then they become "sinister".

PerkingFaintly · 10/04/2026 11:09

logicisall · 10/04/2026 05:06

That didn't take long did it.
Marc Beckman, Exclusive Senior Advisor to First Lady Melania Trump, told the Daily Mail of the timing of the statement: 'First Lady Melania Trump spoke out now because enough is enough. The lies must stop.
'It is time for the public and media to focus on her incredible achievements as First Lady, the lives she has positively impacted, and her commitment to our nation.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15720381/trump-melania-epstein-blindsided.html

The lies must stop.
Nice to see you suddenly care about lying, Melania. Is your husband planning to stop?

time for the public and media to focus on her incredible achievements
Like all your pals focused on the incredible achievements of... well, any Democrat at all?

Think I missed you giving credit where credit was due to Obama, Biden, anyone... I'm not suggesting you have to agree with them 100%, just credit them where it's due. No? Apparently not...

RedTagAlan · 10/04/2026 11:13

MsJinks · 10/04/2026 07:56

Ah I know this - was just repeating their ‘story’ re some intelligence visa - did Trump/melania put this story out there specifically, or it was it just a normal sort of cover story for a lot of people?

I don’t really judge people who do this - they have their reasons - I may judge later actions though!

Yup. Nor do I judge. In fact, I considered doing it myself. I was in a relationship with someone in NY. Got so far as looking for bar work and an apartment. I was a lot younger and a lot dumber. And relationship ended anyway.

But with Melania, it is well known she did do it. And she denies it all. Lots of revision going on. I would rather she was just honest about it. No problem if there are some bits she want's to hide though.

CaveMum · 10/04/2026 11:14

JackieLeeOhmyDarlinNsoul · 10/04/2026 07:58

14 years of underfunding by the conservatives.
That doesn't suddenly get turned round also the cuts to personnel.

Not just the Tories to blame for the defence spending cuts - Labour under Blair/Brown also underinvested in our Forces.

DH was in the RAF 2000-2020 and said they never saw any real investment in that time, whether that was in replacing old equipment/systems or significantly investing in new ones.

Governments of all types across Europe relied on the post-Cold War “peace dividend” to focus their spending elsewhere.

JackieLeeOhmyDarlinNsoul · 10/04/2026 11:29

@CaveMum thanks good to hear from people at the coal face so to speak.👍😁

walllaw · 10/04/2026 11:38

CaveMum · 10/04/2026 11:14

Not just the Tories to blame for the defence spending cuts - Labour under Blair/Brown also underinvested in our Forces.

DH was in the RAF 2000-2020 and said they never saw any real investment in that time, whether that was in replacing old equipment/systems or significantly investing in new ones.

Governments of all types across Europe relied on the post-Cold War “peace dividend” to focus their spending elsewhere.

Edited

But the truth is that in those years defence spending was a pretty unpopular expenditure.

I don't think underinvestment can be blamed on any one party. It seems to me like it was a confluence of events that made the west seem like a relatively stable and peaceful place buttressed by what seemed to be strong alliances, and then there was Brexit.

I just don't see where they're supposed to pull the money from. Theresa May's magic money tree? I mean, basically anything they do they're going to be lambasted and constituents are going to feel underserved and unheard. For the average person, if you can't get an ambulance, you can't get an ambulance, whether it's due to spending on defence or spending on immigrant housing, you're still going to blame the incumbent government, and a disingenuous right wing media ecosystem is going to milk it for all it's worth.

I've always thought that coming into government after the shitshow of Brexit and the last lot was going to be political suicide for whatever party it was, and I suspect I'm right.

DuncinToffee · 10/04/2026 11:46

And Brexit was brought to us by the Tories.

At least Trump is now a positive influence on getting close to the EU/Europe again

RedTagAlan · 10/04/2026 11:54

PerkingFaintly · 10/04/2026 11:09

The lies must stop.
Nice to see you suddenly care about lying, Melania. Is your husband planning to stop?

time for the public and media to focus on her incredible achievements
Like all your pals focused on the incredible achievements of... well, any Democrat at all?

Think I missed you giving credit where credit was due to Obama, Biden, anyone... I'm not suggesting you have to agree with them 100%, just credit them where it's due. No? Apparently not...

Melania was a "birther" I recall. Of the "no smoke without fire" variety.

And HA HA. I wanted to check what the outcome of the story about her demanding all WH toilets seats story was. So I done a web search to fact check myself before posting. And ...... it's "sensitive" where I am. Screen clip below of page 2 of search. The results on page one would not open.

Now, if I was a foil hatter I could wonder why a non US government appears to want to protect Melania. But no. Not that exciting. It's a sort of blanket ban on finding "bad things" about relatives of politicians. For obvious reasons. But I think Don Jr and Eric are "allowed". We are allowed to know about them :-)

Depraved, Desperate, Deluded and Dangerous - Trump Thread #160
Lalgarh · 10/04/2026 11:54

Justdancevance · 10/04/2026 09:11

Vance comes across as an arrogant shit, I can’t imagine the Iranians will deal with him either.

I'm wondering whether Usha will end up more hated as a First Lady than Melania

walllaw · 10/04/2026 11:54

Not defence spending, but I read this a couple months ago and thought it was a really interesting (and depressing) read on something for which Labour is unfairly going to bear the brunt of public dissatisfaction and Reform will likely benefit.

And this was before the Trump-inflicted oil price fiasco.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jan/28/labour-risks-election-wipeout-unless-it-improves-britain-high-streets-study-finds

Labour risks election wipeout unless it improves Britain’s high streets, study finds

Decay of town centres a top issue among voters especially Reform UK supporters and is fuelling resentment against Westminster

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jan/28/labour-risks-election-wipeout-unless-it-improves-britain-high-streets-study-finds

SerendipityJane · 10/04/2026 11:55

CaveMum · 10/04/2026 11:14

Not just the Tories to blame for the defence spending cuts - Labour under Blair/Brown also underinvested in our Forces.

DH was in the RAF 2000-2020 and said they never saw any real investment in that time, whether that was in replacing old equipment/systems or significantly investing in new ones.

Governments of all types across Europe relied on the post-Cold War “peace dividend” to focus their spending elsewhere.

Edited

Governments of all types across Europe relied on the post-Cold War “peace dividend” to focus their spending elsewhere.

The "elsewhere" being their and their mates nests. PFI tracks the codl war dividend by the month.

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 10/04/2026 12:14

walllaw · 10/04/2026 08:26

I don't know. Democrats have cleaned up in almost every election since the presidential one. Elections for school board seats, city councils, judges, state senate seats, governorships, have all gone the right way. Whether or not there will be free and fair elections is another question.

And with Reform leading the polls yesterday despite Farage's role in Brexit, his corruption, his ongoing support for Trump and other Russian-propped puppets, and his obvious and odious lies, I'm not sure we're in much of a stone-throwing position.

We’ve just been watching various talking heads from the US and bemoaning the fact that there is no coherent leadership of the Democrats, no-one whom everyone can get behind to make a concerted effort to oust Trump and the GOP. The Democrats should be doing far more as united party to challenge Trump’s ripping apart and trampling on the Constitution, there should not be this tumbleweed coming from the party as a whole. I would have thought Chuck Schumer should do this, but apparently he doesn’t think it’s in his remit. There doesn’t seem to be a mechanism in the US system for this to happen, outside Presidential elections. It’s strange.

Wipeywipey · 10/04/2026 12:19

CaveMum · 10/04/2026 11:14

Not just the Tories to blame for the defence spending cuts - Labour under Blair/Brown also underinvested in our Forces.

DH was in the RAF 2000-2020 and said they never saw any real investment in that time, whether that was in replacing old equipment/systems or significantly investing in new ones.

Governments of all types across Europe relied on the post-Cold War “peace dividend” to focus their spending elsewhere.

Edited

I think most people are educated enough to want to avoid war, the world over.
There was a naivete that 'wars' might be fought through trade and power through capitalism, which appears to have ended up in the need to blow people up again.

walllaw · 10/04/2026 12:19

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 10/04/2026 12:14

We’ve just been watching various talking heads from the US and bemoaning the fact that there is no coherent leadership of the Democrats, no-one whom everyone can get behind to make a concerted effort to oust Trump and the GOP. The Democrats should be doing far more as united party to challenge Trump’s ripping apart and trampling on the Constitution, there should not be this tumbleweed coming from the party as a whole. I would have thought Chuck Schumer should do this, but apparently he doesn’t think it’s in his remit. There doesn’t seem to be a mechanism in the US system for this to happen, outside Presidential elections. It’s strange.

Oh believe me, I'm right on board with all of that. I was responding to the comment about not having confidence that voters are going to reject Trump. I do think they're rejecting him at almost every possible opportunity right now, and that's despite the Democratic Party, not because of it.

walllaw · 10/04/2026 12:24

@Jaichangecentfoisdenom

Adding that I don't have an action plan prepared for the event that a fleet of flying men drills batters a hole in the roof of my house and pours sulphuric acid into it, which I think we're in the political equivalent of right now. So, there isn't a specific mechanism for dealing with a demented, narcissistic, corrupt, fascistic autocrat against whom the media and congress seem incapacitated, that doesn't mean the Dems shouldn't be trying a damn sight harder and more coherently than they are.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread