Regarding the blackout, Iranians can communicate with extreme difficulty and risk via numerous avenues including VPN, Starlink and even Bluetooth. It is extremely costly but it is possible.
What is underdiscussed is the amount of progress Iranian people were actually able to achieve over the past 30 years (I'm only going back that far because this is what I have personally been able to witness). Protests from within the country were actually able to effect change to women's rights and individual liberties. One very trivial (but symbolic) example of this is dress code - women have been able to win rights to wear make up, show hair, show forearms etc. As I said it is trivial, but it's a massive win for a population where women used to have their hair set alight for having it uncovered (in 1979 and the early 1980s).
Believe it or not, the heads of state that Trump recently assassinated were not the most extreme hardliners that Iran had to offer. I really believe that if the war hadn't happened, then there would have been appetite within Iran to continue electing less extreme leaders and get to a point where a true democracy could be attainable through successive, iterative and progressive changes. But now Iran has been replacing these assassinated figureheads with more extreme figures (e g. Mojtaba Khamenei rather than Hossein Khomeini).
Ali Khamenei was an old man, there was no need to kill him, turn him into a martyr and increase appetite for his son to take over. Hossein Khomeini was more of a reformist Republican who was more likely to back an easing of restrictions on the Iranian people.
Revolutions are unpredictable things, most Iranians have unfortunately witnessed this for themselves. They only work in the general population's favour if there is a strong and viable alternative on offer, and there simply isn't one at this point. I think the most likely winner if the Mullahs fell would be the army/IRGC (bear in mind the last Pahlavi monarchy was established through a military coup)
My ideal government would be a fully secular proportional representative democracy. It won't happen anytime soon though.
I'd like to note that there are other countries in the Middle East that aren't democracies where everyday life is more than tolerable (e.g. the UAE) albeit not completely free. This would be an improvement on the current Iranian situation and a welcome interim state.
My main hope though is that whatever future Iran holds, that is allowed to peacefully act in its own interests - it has previously been punished for daring to nationalise its own oil (1953 and 1979l and for arming itself in order to secure its own defence (largely talking about non nuclear arms here). I genuinely feel like the USA and the UK are threatened by the prospect of Iran daring to thrive so they are doing everything in their power to keep it as a 3rd world country.
It is a country rich in resources, heritage, intellectuals, beauty, amazing food, hospitable people and every imaginable terrain. It would be a prime tourist destination if its borders were open. Even under sanctions it has thrived as a scientific hub. I wish more people could visit it themselves and see what it's really like rather than just through news bites of women in black cloaks, religious fundamentalists, human rights abuses and protests. It is so much more than that.