It’s incredibly short-sighted to accuse those who are not entirely on board with the US’ intervention here of being terrorist sympathisers.
yes, this has the potential to bring about changes in Iran. But the fact is that those changes won’t and can’t be brought about by the US or anyone else, they have to come from within. And the fact that Iran are now retaliating is clear evidence that they’re not going to take this lying down.
The death of a leader only means change if you can eliminate his support as well, and thus far that hasn’t happened.
And America isn’t going to take charge in Iran and force changes, they can’t and shouldn’t.
And anyone who thinks that this is about anything other than power and oil for the US is naive.
You think Trump cares about women? Get real.
In an ideal world change will happen.
In the real world it can only happen if the Iranian people bring it about. And that’s still an uphill battle.
We talked regime change in Iraq. Well that went well didn’t it?
Afghanistan? Well their regime is far worse than it was before we went in, and we couldn’t stay there indefinitely.
you can say that the death of an abhorrent leader is good, and it is. Although tbh I’m not a fan of other countries going in to decide who lives how and why when those same countries wouldn’t welcome the same intrusion into their own politics.
But while celebrating the fall of a leader there is still a bigger picture which hasn’t even started being painted yet. And the fact is that no-one knows how that is going to play out or whether it will bring change for good or not.