Incredible isn’t it. Tbh I’ve not read their social engineering gymnastic proposals on this in detail, although it’s likely there’s not much detail to read, but … EH?
Bridget seems to be saying that Labour are going to restrict local children’s entry into well performing schools, in favour of allowing non local children to have a place at those schools. All based on family wealth / house price.
It appears that the more obvious solution of improving non selective state schools is Too Difficult. Instead they’d rather piggy back on the benefits that wealthier more invested families have brought to a school in the past, use that benefit whilst cutting it off for similar families in future.
I think someone needs to tell them that without improving non selective state schools - these schools only do better Because of their local catchment area. If they fck up the ‘catchment area’ in favour of some 6th form attempt at social engineering, the only people who will suffer are the children. I guess we already know that Labour don’t care much about children.