@MeouwKing and @Damnloginpopup
There's no need to diss everyone else's beliefs, including those of Jewish people, who believe in God just as Christian and Muslims do. They are the three Abrahamic religions. And fyi, Genesis in the Bible talks about the time when there was nothing, no earth and no dinosaurs. And also fyi, some of the most illustrious and famous scientists and physicists in the world believe in a divine start to all that there is. (Or believed, when they were still alive.) Darwin thought that evolution was compatible with faith, for example.
Modern scientists who believe/believed in God
Legendary Scientists who believed in God
You might also be interested to know that quantum physics tells us there are other dimensions. It's thought that there is at least one other dimension of which we have no knowledge because we cannot conceive of it, and that whoever discovers what it is will go down in history on a Newton/Darwin/Einstein level.
Wave-particle duality tells us this other dimension exists, as does the hut-couple experiment. I'm simplifying and it's way too much to explain here, but you can always look it up. The book Quantum Enigma, published by Oxford University Press, is good. Einstein thought there was a spiritual aspect to the universe, and these experiments prove without a doubt he was onto something. They have been replicated at the most respectable academic institutions in the world, and they should not be true, as far as our own perception allows, but the experiments show that they are true.
Basically, the same matter can behave like waves or like particles.....depending on who's watching. But as far as we can perceive, that's impossible. And the hut-couple experiment demonstrates that a man or a woman comes out of the two huts depending on which one you are expecting to see.
They suggest that there is something not exactly permanent or fixed about things in the universe that we perceive to be fixed. Because how can a piece of matter have a dual nature that reveals different sides depending if a human is watching or not? As far as we know, a wave is a wave and a particle is a particle and cannot change depending on if it's being watched or not. However, The Double-Slit Experiment is the classic proof that this is not the case. Send particles (like electrons) through two slits:
- If you don't watch which slit they go through, they form an interference pattern (wave-like).
- If you do watch, they act like particles and the pattern disappears.
If you extrapolate these experiments to the macro level, it's the equivalent of a wall being solid or made of light, depending on if a human is looking at it or not. They indicate that everything is different from how WE perceive it. In other words, that our perception is not reliable and that there's a lot more to the universe than we can see.
Einstein's idea of Spinoza's God, an over-arching intelligent force in our universe might be correct, even if it's not actually old man with a white beard.
So I wouldn't be so sure with your flat, un-nuanced, two-dimensional denial of religion. And it's really not on to piss on everyone else's holy chips. I never, ever, ever talk about my religion, not to anyone. But people who are so arrogant as to declare that there's nothing, and that they know so much better than much of humanity and all of human history, are just asking for a quantum physics lesson.