Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Labour isn't working - Thread 15

1000 replies

TheNuthatch · 26/10/2025 09:59

A chat thread for those who don't like this Labour government.

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Previous thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5430868-labour-isnt-working-thread-14?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
Upstartled · 28/10/2025 09:24

Looks like the dpp isn't prepared to take the hit on being blamed for the collapse of the China spying case. They are laying the collapse at the feet of Collins who was too squeamish to provide evidence that labelled China as an enemy. The dpp is saying that Collins knew for nine months that this would inevitably collapse the case. - Hard to believe that Keir had no idea with that timeframe.

TheNuthatch · 28/10/2025 09:26

Legolava · 28/10/2025 09:21

I hope the cons get their act together. I don’t especially want Reform and I have issues with some previous comments towards minority groups. However, I see how their popularity has grown and why. Just not a fan myself. No judgement to people who are!

You're not alone in your view. I'm not a fan of Reform either. Unfortunately in my constituency, the cons are a wasted vote. My priority is to remove my Labour MP, which will most likely mean voting Reform.
I just hope Reform sort their shit out if they are to form the next government, for all our sakes.

OP posts:
Upstartled · 28/10/2025 09:28

It's so odd to see Labour, Conservatives, LibDems and Greens all within the margin of error of one another.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

TheNuthatch · 28/10/2025 09:29

Upstartled · 28/10/2025 09:24

Looks like the dpp isn't prepared to take the hit on being blamed for the collapse of the China spying case. They are laying the collapse at the feet of Collins who was too squeamish to provide evidence that labelled China as an enemy. The dpp is saying that Collins knew for nine months that this would inevitably collapse the case. - Hard to believe that Keir had no idea with that timeframe.

Edited

Oh really, interesting.
I agree with you, there is no way that Starmer didn't know. This also brings the motivation for the Chagos mess back into sharp focus.

OP posts:
Rivalled · 28/10/2025 09:30

Labour haven’t listened to any go the good advice they’ve had from tax experts, economists to date.

wherever it falls in detail terms, we can guarantee there will be an increase in tax on a group that will squeal, that Labour can represent as ‘not working people’ and ‘restoring fairness’ to garner headlines and hide other tax changes or cuts that affect a broader base. We know this, they won’t change this MO.

my dc is upper primary age - since the third year of primary on, means more children have got their own phones, you go to a party (party!) of 10 year olds and they are all looking at phones or iPads. Educated parents - we seem to be powerless to say no due to them being socially excluded.

my dd is already one of the few without her own phone, and she’s not on the WhatsApp chats (WhatsApp - recommended age 13 plus).

upseedaisee · 28/10/2025 09:34

TheNuthatch · 28/10/2025 09:29

Oh really, interesting.
I agree with you, there is no way that Starmer didn't know. This also brings the motivation for the Chagos mess back into sharp focus.

My sentiments exactly. I always thought there was something squirreley about that deal and my money has been on a China appeasement or some such. Lets face it, Mauritius are in the pocket of China.

TheNuthatch · 28/10/2025 09:36

I was listening to a podcast this morning. The host said that gov insiders were finalising a definition of 'working people'. They will be defined as the lower 2/3rd of earners.

So when Labour say they will protect 'working people', it means those earning £45K or less (approx).
Anyone earning over £45K represents the top third, and will not qualify for protection as a working person.

OP posts:
AbsentosaurusRex · 28/10/2025 09:38

Legolava · 28/10/2025 09:21

I hope the cons get their act together. I don’t especially want Reform and I have issues with some previous comments towards minority groups. However, I see how their popularity has grown and why. Just not a fan myself. No judgement to people who are!

Totally agree. The Greens are almost as bad as Reform, in their own warped way (like Labour but worse). They’re both a terrible prospect.

The Conservatives Have to become a viable option (which I’ll chose) again.

upseedaisee · 28/10/2025 09:40

TheNuthatch · 28/10/2025 09:36

I was listening to a podcast this morning. The host said that gov insiders were finalising a definition of 'working people'. They will be defined as the lower 2/3rd of earners.

So when Labour say they will protect 'working people', it means those earning £45K or less (approx).
Anyone earning over £45K represents the top third, and will not qualify for protection as a working person.

Good god. So what they really mean is anyone on any benefit or receiving top up benefits is a working person and everyone else can just fuck off? Oh that's going to go down well. DS will be reducing his hours now and he won't be the only one. He won't pay this shambles any more than he needs to!

Upstartled · 28/10/2025 09:40

Oh that's crazy, I wonder if they ever stopped to think what would happen if everyone on £45k+ stopped working?

strawberrybubblegum · 28/10/2025 09:42

Upstartled · 28/10/2025 08:59

I suppose that that would take a level of trust that once the mechanism is in place that the threshold won't be lowered each passing year to crowbar more money into the treasury.

Meanwhile it could have more immediate market effects. Those who are riding not too far below the threshold, £1.6- 1.8m are going to struggle to sell because they are in the unenviable situation that new buyers will recognise that they are in closer striking distance of these new taxes.

Stamp duty thresholds haven't reflected inflation over the last 10 years and the direction of travel is to make them ever-more punitive.

So no trust of any level here...

AbsentosaurusRex · 28/10/2025 09:44

TheNuthatch · 28/10/2025 09:36

I was listening to a podcast this morning. The host said that gov insiders were finalising a definition of 'working people'. They will be defined as the lower 2/3rd of earners.

So when Labour say they will protect 'working people', it means those earning £45K or less (approx).
Anyone earning over £45K represents the top third, and will not qualify for protection as a working person.

The host said that gov insiders were finalising a definition of 'working people'.

Ha ha FFS. Bit fcking late Labour. Didn’t you think it was important to define the terms you campaigned on?

I’m getting working on ‘definition of a woman’, vibes. Which Keir also had a problem with. He thinks some women can have penises, father children, get whopping big (or small) hard ons. So they’d never understand that a working person, is one who works. Our country is run by these clueless nasty imbeciles.

strawberrybubblegum · 28/10/2025 09:45

TheNuthatch · 28/10/2025 09:36

I was listening to a podcast this morning. The host said that gov insiders were finalising a definition of 'working people'. They will be defined as the lower 2/3rd of earners.

So when Labour say they will protect 'working people', it means those earning £45K or less (approx).
Anyone earning over £45K represents the top third, and will not qualify for protection as a working person.

Hmm... that's very close to the higher income tax threshold. Coincidence? I think not...

AbsentosaurusRex · 28/10/2025 09:45

upseedaisee · 28/10/2025 09:40

Good god. So what they really mean is anyone on any benefit or receiving top up benefits is a working person and everyone else can just fuck off? Oh that's going to go down well. DS will be reducing his hours now and he won't be the only one. He won't pay this shambles any more than he needs to!

Yep. We live in a country where the gvt punishes workers and rewards non workers and benefit frauds. Super.

EasternStandard · 28/10/2025 09:46

TheNuthatch · 28/10/2025 09:36

I was listening to a podcast this morning. The host said that gov insiders were finalising a definition of 'working people'. They will be defined as the lower 2/3rd of earners.

So when Labour say they will protect 'working people', it means those earning £45K or less (approx).
Anyone earning over £45K represents the top third, and will not qualify for protection as a working person.

Sounds great. Not. What idiots they are.

AbsentosaurusRex · 28/10/2025 09:46

Upstartled · 28/10/2025 09:40

Oh that's crazy, I wonder if they ever stopped to think what would happen if everyone on £45k+ stopped working?

Laffer curve

AbsentosaurusRex · 28/10/2025 09:54

We’re thinking about stopping work, and claiming JSA. Sell the house give the money to a trusted friend or relative (we’re generous like that). Then we’ll go on the ‘what are you entitled to’ gvt website and see if we can get any more free money or a house. Then we’ll look online and find the websites telling us the keywords for any benefit forms. See what else we can claim.

Then when Labour get kicked out, we’ll start working again and buy a house.

Or we’ll move to the ME, where jobs are offered already.

It’s a puzzle.

strawberrybubblegum · 28/10/2025 09:54

They're going to put 2p on all bands of tax, then remove it from basic rate NI only, aren't they?

That extracts more money from pensioners, investors, higher and additional rate income tax payers, but doesn’t change net income for basic rate tax payers.

It also doesn't raise as much as even 1p on basic rate tax payers, whilst distorting pro-social behaviour.

EasternStandard · 28/10/2025 09:54

AbsentosaurusRex · 28/10/2025 09:38

Totally agree. The Greens are almost as bad as Reform, in their own warped way (like Labour but worse). They’re both a terrible prospect.

The Conservatives Have to become a viable option (which I’ll chose) again.

It would be good not least because they have viable proposals on what to do.

AbsentosaurusRex · 28/10/2025 09:55

EasternStandard · 28/10/2025 09:54

It would be good not least because they have viable proposals on what to do.

Who the greens?? They’re as viable as a chocolate teapot.

EasternStandard · 28/10/2025 09:57

AbsentosaurusRex · 28/10/2025 09:55

Who the greens?? They’re as viable as a chocolate teapot.

Nooo do you know me at all @AbsentosaurusRexWink

The conservatives.

Greens are sink the titanic territory.

AbsentosaurusRex · 28/10/2025 09:59

EasternStandard · 28/10/2025 09:57

Nooo do you know me at all @AbsentosaurusRexWink

The conservatives.

Greens are sink the titanic territory.

😂😂🫣 sorry. I’m in height peaked mode! I do know I should’ve known 😂😂

Coffee and work time, work will be less stressful than reading the news and MN news!!

☕️ ❤️❤️

Legolava · 28/10/2025 10:01

TheNuthatch · 28/10/2025 09:36

I was listening to a podcast this morning. The host said that gov insiders were finalising a definition of 'working people'. They will be defined as the lower 2/3rd of earners.

So when Labour say they will protect 'working people', it means those earning £45K or less (approx).
Anyone earning over £45K represents the top third, and will not qualify for protection as a working person.

Yeah, that will be my husband dropping hours and me probably leaving teaching. Good to know that the people who bank roll the lower paid aren’t actually workers.

Hopefully no-one needs a GP, teacher, dentist or police officer soon. Obviously after around 5 years, these lowly professions aren’t workers anymore. Who needs them right?

I am sick of them confusing wealth and income. We have a high income but because of the cost and never ending tax we are not rich, we are comfortable. Broadest shoulders indeed, my mortgage says differently.

Absolute jokers.

EasternStandard · 28/10/2025 10:01

AbsentosaurusRex · 28/10/2025 09:59

😂😂🫣 sorry. I’m in height peaked mode! I do know I should’ve known 😂😂

Coffee and work time, work will be less stressful than reading the news and MN news!!

☕️ ❤️❤️

😬

Upstartled · 28/10/2025 10:02

The Greens really wig me out. As a receptacle for gathering up the Momentum end of Labour, they are pretty useful at splitting the vote, but otherwise they are the worst of nutjobs.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.