Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Labour isn't working - Thread 12

982 replies

TheNuthatch · 06/10/2025 23:28

A chat thread for those who don't like this Labour government.

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Previous thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5419335-labour-isnt-working-thread-11?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

OP posts:
Thread gallery
60
Julen7 · 09/10/2025 20:20

And because a lot of people are making money out of the situation - lawyers, housing, charitable enterprises….

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 09/10/2025 20:26

I don’t believe for a moment that Labour could, but have chosen not to, stop the boats. Nothing intentional about Labour’s failure. They just can’t do anything about it. But nobody can, without a suitable deterrent.

When the Tories developed a deterrent of off-shore processing in Rwanda it began to work - that’s why Ireland got so upset, because so many asylum seekers went there to claim asylum. But Starmer scrapped it. So he only has himself to blame.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Lutonsgirl · 09/10/2025 21:35

Well NHS (England) waiting lists are up again! @Absentosaur

Absentosaur · 09/10/2025 21:42

Lutonsgirl · 09/10/2025 21:35

Well NHS (England) waiting lists are up again! @Absentosaur

True. And private school bills. Water bills. Food bills.

Lutonsgirl · 09/10/2025 21:50

And unemployment, council tax..

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 09/10/2025 22:08

Lutonsgirl · 09/10/2025 21:35

Well NHS (England) waiting lists are up again! @Absentosaur

Oh FFS. 🤦‍♀️

I could understand exasperation about the Tories and waiting lists because the more hopeful and idealistic voices used to urge more spending. But a year after massive tax raids to spend more on the NHS and doctors’ pay demands it’s still getting worse!

Starmer and Reeves really are the Frank Spencer and Mavis Wilton of UK politics.

Edited to change Olive Rudge to Mavis Wilton, because Mavis “I don’t really know” Wilton seems more apt for Reeves.

justasking111 · 09/10/2025 22:16

I've been putting stuff on my Amazon wishlist just as a reminder. Do it around this time every year. Things haven't gone up pence but pounds in the buy again section I browsed through.

Nolletimiere · 09/10/2025 22:31

twistyizzy · 09/10/2025 20:02

Sorry I respect fully disagree that it isn't intentional. They've had 14 years to prepare and with all the resources they have at their disposal it is very hard to justify the wilful destruction of the economy etc.
They have come in and made things worse, that's either because they are completely incompetent or it's because they are doing it on purpose

I wholly agree with you.

Pearlyjam · 09/10/2025 23:04

I must admit that I haven't been all that interested in politics until recently. What does strike me though is how little business acumen our current politicians have, which I find very worrying.

Kier Starmer seems to me, totally incapable of running anything let alone an entire country. Surely a lesson learned from all this mess with the current Government is that we need to put controls in place to prevent this happening again?

A prime minister should, in my opinion, should have proven business experience. They should be a former CEO of a company or CFO. The same for the Chancellor of the Exchechor. If that means they're paid considerably more than what they are currently, then so be it. It's money well spent.

Running a country is, in my opinion, like running a company.

This current lot seem to have no business acumen whatsoever between the lot of them. I think it's insane they're allowed to run (and destroy) our country.

strawberrybubblegum · 10/10/2025 05:50

Pearlyjam · 09/10/2025 23:04

I must admit that I haven't been all that interested in politics until recently. What does strike me though is how little business acumen our current politicians have, which I find very worrying.

Kier Starmer seems to me, totally incapable of running anything let alone an entire country. Surely a lesson learned from all this mess with the current Government is that we need to put controls in place to prevent this happening again?

A prime minister should, in my opinion, should have proven business experience. They should be a former CEO of a company or CFO. The same for the Chancellor of the Exchechor. If that means they're paid considerably more than what they are currently, then so be it. It's money well spent.

Running a country is, in my opinion, like running a company.

This current lot seem to have no business acumen whatsoever between the lot of them. I think it's insane they're allowed to run (and destroy) our country.

Edited

It's a tricky one.

I likewise feel like I'm watching the new grad suddenly running the board. This government don''t seem to have the slightest clue about how to think through ideas and consequences - working on evidence not opinions - and spot and drill into areas of uncertainty or risk: discipline which is second nature to anyone who has worked at a reasonably senior level. I'd expect it from a junior: I'd expect them to come back several times thinking they've finished, and have to give guidance on what else is needed... but I'd have started them with something easy and not too significant: not foreign policy or the budget!

But isn't this the support which the civil service are meant to provide?

It's actually fairly fundamental to our democracy that anyone can go into politics. It comes back to the concept that our MPs are meant to be our representatives, not our rulers.

I'm not sure what's gone wrong? Is it classic Dunning-Kruger in this government - that they see themselves as so above us that they don't realise what they don't know and don't accept the support of the civil service? Or has the civil service gone into decline: or perhaps they've never actually given that support we'd expect, but better/more experienced governments have had at least a few key individuals who have made up for deficits in the civil service with their own strengths?

Certainly the complexity of managing a country like the UK seems to be vastly underestimated - by both the government and voters - and (as our thread title!) it currently just isn't working.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 10/10/2025 06:45

Julen7 · 09/10/2025 20:14

Well I suppose the cynical amongst us might say there lies future Labour voters.

It costs them voters right now, though.

strawberrybubblegum · 10/10/2025 07:29

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 10/10/2025 06:45

It costs them voters right now, though.

I'm not sure it does, tbh. Lefties seem to be all for open borders. The number of times I've heard 'if we put safe routes in, then the illegal migration will stop' with seemingly no understanding of quite how many people worldwide would like a taxpayer-funded life in the UK....

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 10/10/2025 07:54

strawberrybubblegum · 10/10/2025 07:29

I'm not sure it does, tbh. Lefties seem to be all for open borders. The number of times I've heard 'if we put safe routes in, then the illegal migration will stop' with seemingly no understanding of quite how many people worldwide would like a taxpayer-funded life in the UK....

Edited

I know that one of the lovely posters here posts some colour charts.
I can't find it at the moment, but you can see there where the votes bleed into.

I'll take. look later, off to work now.

Julen7 · 10/10/2025 08:04

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 10/10/2025 06:45

It costs them voters right now, though.

Yes true.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 10/10/2025 08:11

strawberrybubblegum · 10/10/2025 07:29

I'm not sure it does, tbh. Lefties seem to be all for open borders. The number of times I've heard 'if we put safe routes in, then the illegal migration will stop' with seemingly no understanding of quite how many people worldwide would like a taxpayer-funded life in the UK....

Edited

I’ve never understood the ‘safe routes’ point. Surely anyone who is in genuine peril flees anyway. So application by others who aren’t genuinely seeking asylum would be turned down and those people would come by boat etc anyway.

twistyizzy · 10/10/2025 08:25

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 10/10/2025 07:54

I know that one of the lovely posters here posts some colour charts.
I can't find it at the moment, but you can see there where the votes bleed into.

I'll take. look later, off to work now.

That's me and here is the latest one 😊

Labour isn't working - Thread 12
strawberrybubblegum · 10/10/2025 08:36

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 10/10/2025 08:11

I’ve never understood the ‘safe routes’ point. Surely anyone who is in genuine peril flees anyway. So application by others who aren’t genuinely seeking asylum would be turned down and those people would come by boat etc anyway.

With our current asylum system, hundreds of millions of people worldwide could say the right words to be granted asylum. There are many countries which oppress particular religions, or LGBT people. No one knows what is in your mind, so anyone can claim those. We can't take everyone who lives in a country with illiberal laws who would rather live in the UK.

Hete's just a little example - from 7 years ago, so undoubtedly much more prevalent now with our activist lawyers. Do you really think all the people being baptised in this church where 95% of the congregation are immigrants are completely uninfluenced by it being a free pass to stay in the UK?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-42891162.amp

Daniel

Cardiff baptisms for religious asylum seekers fleeing Iran

An asylum seeker who feared he would be killed for converting faith is one of 300 baptised.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-42891162.amp

strawberrybubblegum · 10/10/2025 08:39

The asylum rules need to be tightened up significantly, even without the safe routes - too many people are just coming anyway.

But safe routes with current rules would be insane.

TheNuthatch · 10/10/2025 09:40

Morning all 😁 TFI Friday!

I'm chuckling to myself reading all the Trump threads. The left can't seem to bring themselves to give Trump any credit. I hope he does get the nobel prize.

Starmer has definitely lost votes on immigration, look at the red wall. Reform wouldn't be polling as they are if Labour had 'smashed the gangs'. Starmer is a HR lawyer, so he'll never get what the issue is, but he does want to stay in power. Hence 'island of strangers' etc. The flip side is that every time he tries to ape Nigel, he loses votes to the left. He can't win, which is fine by me.

Those colour charts are a brilliant illustration, thanks @twistyizzy. Agree that there needs to be a tightening up of who classifies as an asylum seeker. Kemi's proposals earlier in the week spoke about ending claims based on sexuality and religion.

OP posts:
Rivalled · 10/10/2025 09:41

This stock market overheating story is gathering pace…US investors dumping shares, particularly
in AI…

Fears rise over $3tn shadow banking crisis

Rivalled · 10/10/2025 09:44

Oh and this :

Wage growth falls to four-year low amid weak demand for staff

www.thetimes.com/article/b46a5a0c-09a9-4008-a737-e690a645d2d3?shareToken=b2450a906825f7b1f406ae7eccde61a1

TheNuthatch · 10/10/2025 09:48

Rivalled · 10/10/2025 09:44

Oh and this :

Wage growth falls to four-year low amid weak demand for staff

www.thetimes.com/article/b46a5a0c-09a9-4008-a737-e690a645d2d3?shareToken=b2450a906825f7b1f406ae7eccde61a1

Thanks for the share.
No surprises there.

Analysts have blamed Rachel Reeves for weakening the labour market by raising employers’ national insurance contributions by £25 billion.

OP posts:
Rivalled · 10/10/2025 09:52

And a stock market correction is the last thing anyone needs!

upseedaisee · 10/10/2025 09:53

TheNuthatch · 10/10/2025 09:48

Thanks for the share.
No surprises there.

Analysts have blamed Rachel Reeves for weakening the labour market by raising employers’ national insurance contributions by £25 billion.

Well whodathunkit?
It's rich they have the nerve to say the avaerage pay increase is 4.5%. Maybe for the public sector....