Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Why was it mostly men on the march?

599 replies

noblegiraffe · 14/09/2025 09:48

I've seen quite a few photos of the march yesterday, and they pretty much all look like the one below. Vast majority men. Why is that? Why is Robinson's patriot messaging and call-to-action landing mostly with men and not women?

Voting by sex wasn't massively different in the last general election - men were certainly more likely to vote Reform, but not by a huge amount, so generally politically we're not that different.

Why was it mostly men on the march?
Why was it mostly men on the march?
OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
MrsSkylerWhite · 14/09/2025 11:12

spookysoul · 14/09/2025 09:56

Because it’s just an excuse for thuggish men to behave exactly like that. Wives/girlfriends will remain where they’ve been told to- at home.

Or they’re too embarrassed to be seen in public with these twats.

This.

juldan · 14/09/2025 11:12

Usernameunavailableagain12 · 14/09/2025 11:01

Ah you got your info from the biased bbc 😂
did they also report that the day was 99% peaceful? That they held a tribute to Charlie Kirk? The media can’t even report the number of people in attendance correctly.

So if it was 99% peaceful, injured policemen are the fair price to pay. How very Charlie Kirk like.

Mrsknowitall · 14/09/2025 11:12

I know quite a few women who went. I do quite like this post and how you’ve mentioned that it’s all or mainly men that went as we can argue and also ask the same question back about how come it’s all or mainly men coming over on the boats and those saying that it’s because they are all thugs that went to that march are we allowed to say that all the men On the boats are terrorist! Seriously the double standards of you lot are astounding 😂

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

vegetarianlouise · 14/09/2025 11:12

Beachtastic · 14/09/2025 11:01

I know a guy who went. He's a gentle soul, not racist, hardworking, puts his wife and family first but would do anything for anyone if he possibly can. He shared this on FB to explain his reasons. I hate to think of him being dismissed as a lout, it's more complicated than that.

www.facebook.com/reel/9097202147051223

I find the video pretty scary TBH, reminds me of those white supremacy german videos of the 1930's used to recruit youths to the nazi cause full of white people dresses in ledenhoses and blond kids while praising aryan culture and very outdated values.

shudders

RonnyRite · 14/09/2025 11:13

chilliheeler123 · 14/09/2025 11:11

I went into London yesterday to see Miriam Margolyes, there were some people on the train who were clearly off to the march. Already drunk by lunchtime, practically beating their chests in delight when anyone who wasn’t white got on the train as they knew their presence would be intimidating. All men. Probably some women on the train also going to the march, but I didn’t spot them as they were not nearly so performative.

I feel my own evening was far better spent Grin

Miriam Margoyles fan you say. Not surprised.

noblegiraffe · 14/09/2025 11:13

Anchorage56 · 14/09/2025 11:03

OP do you have any thoughts on why you thought it was mostly men ?

Not fully formed ones, no. I'm working on it, hence this thread.

I did post this thread a week ago https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5406175-if-you-dont-care-to-think-of-girls-and-women-as-persons-with-agency-then-think-of-them-as-resources
about a tweet that was retweeted by Tommy Robinson which started
"If you don’t care to think of girls and women as persons with agency, then think of them as resources—incredibly valuable resources that you, as a resource-oriented male, would be foolish not to protect. In fact, they are the most valuable resource. Without women, you cannot have offspring to perpetuate the survival of your clan."

So if the sorts of men who follow Tommy Robinson are also the sorts of men who 'if you don't care to think of girls and women as persons with agency' might apply to, then I guess that might explain why fewer women might be engaged with the messaging and marching.

And perhaps if the men on the march are less likely to think of women as persons of agency, their wives are more likely to be at home, being resources?

OP posts:
ThreePears · 14/09/2025 11:14

Because it's just an excuse for thuggish men to behave exactly like that

Yep. Yobs and thugs will take any opportunity to cause aggro, and a lot of them will just piggy-back onto whatever cause happens to be available.

StewkeyBlue · 14/09/2025 11:14

Personperson · 14/09/2025 10:07

It's easy to be throwing around stereotypes when you don't agree with their stance.

All thugs and pub goers?

I aren't saying I agree with it but it's lazy to throw around generalisations.

I know a few people who went. I didn't know they were going, I saw it on their social media.

A young lad I know who went is neither a pub goer or a thug. He is an office worker who barely drinks and never causes issues. His mother attended with him and she isn't a thug either. They live quiet lives but they feel strongly about this clearly.

It's easy to try to put down the people who's views you don't agree with by labeling them all as stupid, racist or thugs.

It's no different to calling remain people snowflakes.

Both are pathetic in my eyes.

If people have a valid worry and they wish to protest about it peacefully, I don't think calling people names because you don't agree with it, intelligent.

Do you have the same opinion regarding the palestine protesters? Who wave a flag that doesn't even belong to this country and their people who's beliefs probably don't align with our beliefs and laws? Like I hardly think they'd be kind and loving to our LGBT community.

Maybe rather than give into name calling, use your brain and discuss things rationally without getting personal.

Edited

I agree that there are many people who have feelings about genuine patriotism, genuine concerns about immigration, etc. just as Brexiteers included a wide range of people alongside Farages Blue Passport supporters.

But TR himself is a criminal. With a background in deliberate organised football hooligans. I know people whose partners go on all these sorts of causes:Millwall / cenotaph/ TR etc and they are 100% thugs.

There’s a Critical Mass.

It would be better if there was a sensible way to discuss concerns that didn’t attract a critical mass of thugs.

But you really can’t deny their leading involvement. Starting with TR.

PandoraSocks · 14/09/2025 11:15

Usernameunavailableagain12 · 14/09/2025 10:06

It looked peaceful from what I saw on the live stream, honestly I felt so proud of the country yesterday

.

Why was it mostly men on the march?
spookysoul · 14/09/2025 11:16

Also, for those who have pointed it out, it is as significant to mention that they were (almost) all white as it is to mention that they were (almost) all male. It shows the target demographic of Tommy Robinson et al. And the racial divide it has caused.
It’s hardly ‘uniting the kingdom’ when everybody looks the bloody same is it?

vegetarianlouise · 14/09/2025 11:17

noblegiraffe · 14/09/2025 11:13

Not fully formed ones, no. I'm working on it, hence this thread.

I did post this thread a week ago https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5406175-if-you-dont-care-to-think-of-girls-and-women-as-persons-with-agency-then-think-of-them-as-resources
about a tweet that was retweeted by Tommy Robinson which started
"If you don’t care to think of girls and women as persons with agency, then think of them as resources—incredibly valuable resources that you, as a resource-oriented male, would be foolish not to protect. In fact, they are the most valuable resource. Without women, you cannot have offspring to perpetuate the survival of your clan."

So if the sorts of men who follow Tommy Robinson are also the sorts of men who 'if you don't care to think of girls and women as persons with agency' might apply to, then I guess that might explain why fewer women might be engaged with the messaging and marching.

And perhaps if the men on the march are less likely to think of women as persons of agency, their wives are more likely to be at home, being resources?

Double standards as usual when Tommy knew of 22 nonces within his EDL movement.

AngelinaFibres · 14/09/2025 11:17

Jamesblonde2 · 14/09/2025 09:52

Probably because it’s the weekend, children off school and child minding. If people live some distance away and have had to travel you can’t even leave young teens alone. Before someone dives in and say men are capable of child care, I live in the real world and my point is about child care.

This. Football training, ballet lessons, swimming, food shopping. I would have been doing all those type of things on a Saturday. If I'd been at work all week as well the last thing I would have wanted to do was travel from Worcester to London and spend the day at a thing that most people would know was very ' male heavy' and would involve violence at some point.

Usernameunavailableagain12 · 14/09/2025 11:17

chilliheeler123 · 14/09/2025 11:11

I went into London yesterday to see Miriam Margolyes, there were some people on the train who were clearly off to the march. Already drunk by lunchtime, practically beating their chests in delight when anyone who wasn’t white got on the train as they knew their presence would be intimidating. All men. Probably some women on the train also going to the march, but I didn’t spot them as they were not nearly so performative.

I feel my own evening was far better spent Grin

I’m sure this happened 😂

noblegiraffe · 14/09/2025 11:17

spookysoul · 14/09/2025 11:16

Also, for those who have pointed it out, it is as significant to mention that they were (almost) all white as it is to mention that they were (almost) all male. It shows the target demographic of Tommy Robinson et al. And the racial divide it has caused.
It’s hardly ‘uniting the kingdom’ when everybody looks the bloody same is it?

I didn't bother asking why they were majority white because I think that's obvious.

OP posts:
TheBucketWomen · 14/09/2025 11:17

They all seem to be right wing. They might not let their wife attend.

Beachtastic · 14/09/2025 11:18

vegetarianlouise · 14/09/2025 11:12

I find the video pretty scary TBH, reminds me of those white supremacy german videos of the 1930's used to recruit youths to the nazi cause full of white people dresses in ledenhoses and blond kids while praising aryan culture and very outdated values.

shudders

Yes, I know what you mean! -- there is a strong element of nostalgia for a lost world. But Nazi propaganda portrayed a world that had never existed and invented a race that had never existed. This recalls a world experienced by many within living memory, that has rapidly changed beyond recognition.

It's a complicated issue I think, and I don't think it helps to dismiss everyone expressing concern as a bunch of ignorant morons.

Digdongdoo · 14/09/2025 11:19

Usernameunavailableagain12 · 14/09/2025 11:17

I’m sure this happened 😂

This happens on non protest days. So im not sure why you would doubt it.

Anchorage56 · 14/09/2025 11:19

spookysoul · 14/09/2025 11:16

Also, for those who have pointed it out, it is as significant to mention that they were (almost) all white as it is to mention that they were (almost) all male. It shows the target demographic of Tommy Robinson et al. And the racial divide it has caused.
It’s hardly ‘uniting the kingdom’ when everybody looks the bloody same is it?

Would non white people be so likely to march against immigration?

LizzyEm · 14/09/2025 11:20

Funny how 'its all men, where are the women and children, they're all thugs' is a concern here but the undocumented MEN with no women and children arriving in boats aren't 🤔

Donttellempike · 14/09/2025 11:20

Anyone who chooses to go on a March organized by little Tommy ten names. At which Musk invites overthrow of our democratically elected government is a racist traitor. The end

spookysoul · 14/09/2025 11:21

noblegiraffe · 14/09/2025 11:17

I didn't bother asking why they were majority white because I think that's obvious.

Indeed, but some others here have taken offence when it has been mentioned 🙄

juldan · 14/09/2025 11:22

Shedmistress · 14/09/2025 11:10

No, they apparently stopped people walking over the bridge on the agreed route and kettled them.

I didn't say they hit themselves. Why must people just make stuff up all the time?

I see. The police stopped people going on the apparently agreed route so it was ok to injure them. Understood.

sciaticafanatica · 14/09/2025 11:22

@spookysoulbut they say the same about illegal migration… all non white mostly male so are they right in thinking they must be terrorists as you are thinking that all the marchers must be racist thugs ??

vegetarianlouise · 14/09/2025 11:23

@Donttellempike March organized by little Tommy ten names

😂

spookysoul · 14/09/2025 11:24

Anchorage56 · 14/09/2025 11:19

Would non white people be so likely to march against immigration?

That’s… my point?