Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Charlie Kirk dead

1000 replies

Booneymil · 10/09/2025 23:20

The last thread was taken down because of personal insults towards the man.

We should be able to have a thread about this news topic.

Report any insulting posts. Mumsnet can you please just delete the offending posts, instead of deleting the whole thread?

Thank you.

Charlie Kirk has died today. He was shot at a public talk that he was giving.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 09:10

Anonentity · 11/09/2025 09:05

I would describe them as far right.
American conservative has a very wide range, which includes far right.
Saying the deaths of innocent people - school children - are worth a gun policy is harmful, especially when it endorsed by a president.

People in the UK can’t hold a cardboard sign saying they support a non-violent group trying obstructs machinery which helps a genocide.
They are carted off.

This guy could literally put together a tour to show off. That’s going to anger people. A risk he owned and sadly paid.

People are “carted off” for holding lots of signs and lots of things they write (unless you want to attack women). We need to fully allow free speech, but then any group attacking military assets which are there to be used to defend this country quite rightly should be labelled terrorists)

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 11/09/2025 09:10

Rewis · 11/09/2025 08:44

I disagree with everything this man represents. I wish people like him wouldnt exist, I wish they didn't have access to microphones and I wish they were not going around campuses trying to poison young minds.

However, i do not wish death on anyone. And I won't celebrate anyone's death. I don't know what the motivation was, but if it was political then we are fucked. If YouTubers are getting assassinated for political reasons. There is no hope in the world.

He was a big supporter of gun rights and believed that annual gun deaths are worth it.

‘You wish people like him wouldn’t exist’. Guess what? Someone agreed with you and killed him.

1dayatatime · 11/09/2025 09:10

Merrymouse · 11/09/2025 09:10

Is anything known about the identity of the shooter?

There seems to be a lot of commentary about left wing and right wing, but doesn't experience show that these shootings tend to be more complicated?

They haven't caught him and he is still on the loose.

TheCatsTongue · 11/09/2025 09:11

WellThisIsFranklyDreadful · 11/09/2025 09:08

If you want to be a pedant, Hitler didn’t personally kill anyone. He just said things.

Words have power, particularly when you are using them to sway the vulnerable and the gullible.

I missed the part where Hitler was a leader who ordered invasions and the murder of 6 million Jews.

Rosscameasdoody · 11/09/2025 09:11

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 08:43

Oh it’s not deranged, it just is incompatible with your ideology. Stating a person is mad because they don’t agree politically with you is a sign of not believing in free speech, often employed by totalitarian states.

This is a war against a terrorist leadership with a stated aim to wipe out the Jewish state of Israel, a state which was invaded by terrorists, women children and men were brutally tortured and slaughtered in cold blood, where hostages were taken, some of whom were later killed, others remain captive. Hamas knew Israel would have no choice but to retaliate. Hamas have deliberately hidden in places where mass civilian casualties would occur is attacked (likewise we’d it’s weapon storage). What would you have liked Israel to do, invite them round for a chat over tea?

Hamas knew what the fall out would be, the attacks were specifically designed to provoke the wrath of Israel, the more women and children die, Hamas knows the more people will be outraged, they have no interest in stopping it.

Israel are stuck between a rock as nd a hard place. Keeping bombing to defend itself, or give up and risk being attacked by people who want to wipe Israel and the people in it off the face of the Earth.

Yes it is terrible - war is terrible. Investigations need to occur regarding the legality of some of Israel’s tactics and people need to be held accountable if found guilty by due process. This does not excuse people supporting and waving the flag of a terrorist run area. One with appalling human rights. People have been manipulated by terrorists into supporting a regime with some of the worst women’s rights, a regime which is homophobic. A regime which has zero religious tolerance. A regime which has tried to use its women and children as human shields.

so no I’m not deranged. I have just retained my ability to think critically

Does your critical thinking stretch to educating yourself as to how many times in the past Israel has sabotaged the peace protest ? How many of their own politicians who advocated for withdrawal of the illegal Jewish settlements somehow ended up accused of various crimes and removed from office ? How the division of land they proposed for a Palestinian state consisted of mostly barren desert ? Or even how many of their own people disagree with what their government is doing ?

Does it stretch to taking a good look at places like Hebron, where Palestinian workers returned home to find their windows and doors welded shut and Israeli checkpoints on their doorsteps ? Where Palestinian communities and livelihoods were destroyed without a second thought and an apartheid system of their streets imposed ?

Pharazon · 11/09/2025 09:11

Never heard of him. Americans shooting other Americans isn’t really news is it?

WellThisIsFranklyDreadful · 11/09/2025 09:12

TheCatsTongue · 11/09/2025 09:11

I missed the part where Hitler was a leader who ordered invasions and the murder of 6 million Jews.

I mean, that’s a pretty big thing for you to miss, did you not do history at school?

EasternStandard · 11/09/2025 09:12

CurlewKate · 11/09/2025 08:56

Not on here, thankfully. But saying that people are is a good way of deflecting the discussion.

Yes there are on here. And it is part of the discussion. Anyone sensible and decent is talking about the impact of the reaction to this.

BananaPeels · 11/09/2025 09:12

Anonentity · 11/09/2025 09:05

I would describe them as far right.
American conservative has a very wide range, which includes far right.
Saying the deaths of innocent people - school children - are worth a gun policy is harmful, especially when it endorsed by a president.

People in the UK can’t hold a cardboard sign saying they support a non-violent group trying obstructs machinery which helps a genocide.
They are carted off.

This guy could literally put together a tour to show off. That’s going to anger people. A risk he owned and sadly paid.

But I wouldn’t - that’s the point. I don’t think he was far right. American politics is very different to the UK and impossible to reconcile directly. What we feel about guns is very different to the US. I would ban them all absolutely but having spent years travelling the US it is absolutely something most Brits wouldn’t understand

TheCatsTongue · 11/09/2025 09:13

WellThisIsFranklyDreadful · 11/09/2025 09:12

I mean, that’s a pretty big thing for you to miss, did you not do history at school?

Well clearly you did, basically saying the guy was Hitler.

WellThisIsFranklyDreadful · 11/09/2025 09:13

TheCatsTongue · 11/09/2025 09:13

Well clearly you did, basically saying the guy was Hitler.

You might want to read what you actually wrote. That’s embarrassing for you.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 11/09/2025 09:14

Oldglasses · 11/09/2025 09:05

I can’t help thinking it’s a case of he lived by the sword, he died by the sword.

Obviously no-one should be getting shot for their views, but he was very much against gun control and didn’t mind a few people dying for the sake of the second amendment, bet he never thought it would happen to him though.

I feel bad for his family, and worried about the state of America and politics in general. It’s so divisive now. Who is going to be the next poor sod who’s shot for their views/religion/beliefs?

I agree. People die in all sorts of ways and we still do the things that kills them, as we believe it’s our right to the freedoms those things give us, that makes it worth it.

Tessasanderson · 11/09/2025 09:14

I think we need to worry about where this is leading society. TBH i say leading, its more a case of we are already way down this path.

I go back to my own childhood 40 years ago. I kind of knew who my parents voted for but it was never really discussed. I never had a hint of knowing who other people voted for. Other peoples opinions didnt really get shared in the way we do today. We didnt have the platforms for it like MN and social media.

Now its everywhere. There isnt a day, hour, minute goes by without something divisive being posted or debated. We do it to death on here ourselves.

But here is the thing and it is as clear as day to me it started when brexit and covid kicked off. We have become a generation who cannot and will not accept other sides to an argument. We cannot believe others may think something differently and we will get nasty, abusive and sometimes downright horrible to argue our point regardless of the fact it is often a race to the bottom of the barrell. Normally sound, sane people will turn into rabid animals, foaming at the mouth to make their point and stamp down on those with alternative or differing opinions.

I saw it all over facebook when covid was happening. I see it now when a covid thread appears on here still. Bing up a brexit point and it kicks off. Those that believe Covid is still around think those that dont are trying to kill them. Those that dont believe in it feel like those that do are trying to ruin their lives and take away their freedom.

Mark my words, this has filtered into politics. Or was it always there but older generations didnt have the platforms to see it. Politics has become sensationalised and its participants are now much more accessible and public figures. Rather than doing it for what they believe in, they do it for the status symbol and attention. They are professional politicians with really zero substance.

The nastiness remains in politics and its getting worse and worse. Lovely people i know are having to be muted whenever there is an issue. Immigration, brexit, taxes. It cant be discussed anymore without belittling people with alternative views or if it really kicks off being downright nasty.

Who is surprised that if everything goes down this path the end result is assassinations? I am not at all and trust me i dont see an end to this path.

PolkaDotPorridge · 11/09/2025 09:14

WellThisIsFranklyDreadful · 11/09/2025 09:02

I feel sad for his children, but I will not mourn the death of a man who died as a direct result of trying to spread hate. He stated very publicly that gun deaths are the acceptable price to pay to have the second amendment, and that children being shot to death at school were collateral damage to maintain the freedoms of gun ownership. He said that empathy was a woke invention and a danger to society. So I will not waste my empathy on someone who despised it, who died in a way he publicly stated he was just fine with.

Agreed.

blackpooolrock · 11/09/2025 09:15

This thread confirms to me what i have thought for many years. Many people are vile - absolutely vile. They are entrenched in their views and only their views are right. They twist the things they read to suit their own agenda, they aren't interested in debate or hearing another opinion.

It's a sad reflection of society today. A lack of respect, a lack of reasoning and a lack of emotional intelligence.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 09:15

1dayatatime · 11/09/2025 09:10

They haven't caught him and he is still on the loose.

i think most think this was a professional hit due to the nature of the shot and disappearance of the gunman To go to those lengths it would be someone who wanted to silence him. This would indicate someone who either disagreed with his personal perspective or the government of which he was supporter and whose views he largely aligned with. This would, whilst not conclusive, certainly indicate a left leaning motive.

it is unlikely (although not impossible) this was a deranged individual who could have a number of motives (and would more likely have been shot or arrested)

WellThisIsFranklyDreadful · 11/09/2025 09:16

TheCatsTongue · 11/09/2025 09:13

Well clearly you did, basically saying the guy was Hitler.

You said “I missed the part where Hitler was a leader who ordered invasions and the murder of 6 million Jews.” Which is a pretty major failing of education on your part. I suspect you meant to say Charlie Kirk, to which I respond - I never said Charlie Kirk was like Hitler. I said that words are not just words, they have power, and used the example of Hitler, who brought about the death of millions of people simply with his words. YOU were the one who made a link between Hitler and Kirk directly, and it’s interesting that that’s where your mind went, isn’t it….?

DiscoNights · 11/09/2025 09:16

blackpooolrock · 11/09/2025 09:15

This thread confirms to me what i have thought for many years. Many people are vile - absolutely vile. They are entrenched in their views and only their views are right. They twist the things they read to suit their own agenda, they aren't interested in debate or hearing another opinion.

It's a sad reflection of society today. A lack of respect, a lack of reasoning and a lack of emotional intelligence.

I completely agree

Haemagoblin · 11/09/2025 09:17

Chickenbone123 · 10/09/2025 23:53

I can’t believe a previous thread was deleted!!! Seriously. MN needs to ban everyone in that post who was saying things warranting deletion. I don’t believe British women would speak badly on a dead American politician. So who are they? And Why?!

A man who wants to take away women's bodily autonomy and have us all living in Gilead is an enemy of all women, everywhere. Of course British women would have shit to say about him, we stand with our American sisters. As time goes on national borders mean less and less to me, and it becomes more and more clear that the real war is men against women and children, and always has been.

1dayatatime · 11/09/2025 09:17

Panama2 · 11/09/2025 09:06

If you have to kill someone to win the argument you have already lost

But if you can see that you are increasingly losing the argument (public opinion polls shifting to the right) then some will revert to violence rather than concede democratic defeat.

BananaPeels · 11/09/2025 09:18

Haemagoblin · 11/09/2025 09:17

A man who wants to take away women's bodily autonomy and have us all living in Gilead is an enemy of all women, everywhere. Of course British women would have shit to say about him, we stand with our American sisters. As time goes on national borders mean less and less to me, and it becomes more and more clear that the real war is men against women and children, and always has been.

There are plenty of women in the Uk are anti abortion. It isn’t the only view to be pro abortion despite what people put on social media. .

Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · 11/09/2025 09:19

Panama2 · 11/09/2025 09:06

If you have to kill someone to win the argument you have already lost

Again. You don't know who shot him and why.

Could be his jilted lover for all you know.

InvisibleSockLady · 11/09/2025 09:19

BananaPeels · 11/09/2025 09:12

But I wouldn’t - that’s the point. I don’t think he was far right. American politics is very different to the UK and impossible to reconcile directly. What we feel about guns is very different to the US. I would ban them all absolutely but having spent years travelling the US it is absolutely something most Brits wouldn’t understand

He openly expressed islamaphobia. He opposed abortion even in the case of 10 year old rape victims and he denied climate change. He opposed the Civil Rights Act. He helped to organise the January 6th insurrection which attempted to overthrow the democratically elected government. He absolutely was far-right, and while these views have strong traction in America they do not reflect the majority of opinions.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 09:19

WellThisIsFranklyDreadful · 11/09/2025 09:16

You said “I missed the part where Hitler was a leader who ordered invasions and the murder of 6 million Jews.” Which is a pretty major failing of education on your part. I suspect you meant to say Charlie Kirk, to which I respond - I never said Charlie Kirk was like Hitler. I said that words are not just words, they have power, and used the example of Hitler, who brought about the death of millions of people simply with his words. YOU were the one who made a link between Hitler and Kirk directly, and it’s interesting that that’s where your mind went, isn’t it….?

It wasn’t just with his words though was it? It was also the small matter of invading several countries, displacement and ultimately th Ed rounding up of Jews (and other groups). It was the establishment of concentration camps, setting up the gas chambers. It wasn’t “just words”

Jollyjoy · 11/09/2025 09:19

He was a man who advocated people discussing their differing views and said violence was the result of not doing this. He is 100% correct on that. Yes I find many of his views objectionable but I prefer to listen and learn how other people think, and respect the way he listened courteously to those he disagreed with. You only have to watch some of his videos to see some shared humanity. We all just adopt the views we feel are best and all the denouncing of certain camps as evil, ‘full of hate’ ‘fascists’ is a childish strategy that does nothing to help our world.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread