Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Charlie Kirk dead

1000 replies

Booneymil · 10/09/2025 23:20

The last thread was taken down because of personal insults towards the man.

We should be able to have a thread about this news topic.

Report any insulting posts. Mumsnet can you please just delete the offending posts, instead of deleting the whole thread?

Thank you.

Charlie Kirk has died today. He was shot at a public talk that he was giving.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
AngelicKaty · 11/09/2025 07:41

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 07:04

You must have missed the many deleted posts celebrating the assassination of a man for his beliefs in front of his young children )giving you the benefit the doubt )

On this thread? That's a lie.

thepariscrimefiles · 11/09/2025 07:42

TeenagersAngst · 11/09/2025 07:10

So if women made decisions you didn’t like and didn’t agree with, would that be ok?

Women should be allowed to make their own reproductive choices. I would assume that women who are anti-abortion would not have an abortion themselves under any circumstances and that is their choice which I respect. I don't respect women who try and deny reproductive freedom, including the right to an abortion, for other women.

LillyPJ · 11/09/2025 07:42

hamstersarse · 11/09/2025 07:31

I don’t know what has happened to peoples brains to say being ‘pro life is dangerous’

Read the actual words.

Saying you support life is dangerous?

You been politicised so much that you can’t be rational

But 'pro life' is a weaselly phrase. It suggests that it promotes life (which is obviously a good thing) but brushes under the carpet any downsides, such as dangers to the mother's health and her life. Being against 'pro life' is not the same as being anti life.

Skipthisbit · 11/09/2025 07:42

thepariscrimefiles · 11/09/2025 05:27

The looney left? Political assassinations or attempted assassinations seem to be the modus operandi of the loony right:

The man who targeted and killed Democratic state Rep Melissa Hortman was a Trump supporter.

The man who targeted the home of Dem Governor Josh Shapiro was a Trump supporter.

The men who wanted to hang Mike Pence on Jan 6th were Trump supporters.

The man who targeted and killed the son of Obama-appointed District Judge Esther Salas was a Trump supporter.

The man who tried to kidnap Nancy Pelosi and assaulted her husband was a Trump supporter.

The men who were convicted trying to kidnap Dem Governor Gretchen Whitmer were Trump supporters.

The man who sent pipe bombs to the homes of Obama and Biden was a Trump supporter.

There is no equivalent or even similar list of Obama or Biden supporters who have carried out similar murders, attempted murders, or violent attacks.

This!! Seriously wondered if I’ve entered a parallel universe. The “loonie left” are the violent ones ….. absolute bullshit. Almost all of the political violence perpetrated in the last decade in America has been against left wing politicians. (gabby Gifford is missing from the list above) This (& the trump “attempt”) are very rare example of it being against right wingers.

InvisibleSockLady · 11/09/2025 07:42

hamstersarse · 11/09/2025 07:31

I don’t know what has happened to peoples brains to say being ‘pro life is dangerous’

Read the actual words.

Saying you support life is dangerous?

You been politicised so much that you can’t be rational

Someone saying they are pro-life is being disingenuous. Being anti-abortion is not supporting life - it is supporting the deaths of the women and girls who will inevitably die as a result of abortion bans. The phrase 'pro life' is a lie - if you seek to deny women lifesaving health care, which is what total abortion bans do - you are pro the deaths of women and girls.

hamstersarse · 11/09/2025 07:43

brownboulders · 11/09/2025 07:39

I watched a lot of Charlie’s debates and while I didn’t agree with him on some points, he always allowed the opposing view to have a platform and he often showed compassion and grace to people radically different to him. He absolutely wasn’t a ‘religious maniac’, just a man with a deep faith and arguments which flowed logically from that belief system. I wonder how many on this thread have actually watched any of his debates?

There is zero justification for murdering someone because of their political views. Zero.

They’ve watched a clip, probably posted by some left wing fanatic commentary

Charlie Kirk was a good man, objectively,

FitatFifty · 11/09/2025 07:43

We need to stop this trend that if someone doesn’t agree with your beliefs they are a ‘fascist’ which is where we are heading.

I didn’t agree with everything Charlie believed but he was a reasonable man who wanted to have conversations and debates. It’s a sad time.

Sevenamcoffee · 11/09/2025 07:43

The first thing my very ‘woke’ lefty dd said to me this morning was that she is very perturbed that people were not being respectful and she was concerned for his kids. Unfortunately the disrespectful voices will turn him into a martyr and make the divisions worse.

I always think of the woman who left the Westboro Baptist family cult after realising the abhorrence of their views through discussion with people on twitter. She used to stand outside funerals harassing bereaved families with disgusting placards. She has completely changed now and so it’s apparent that even people with extreme and absurd views can be persuaded with discussion to change their minds.

AngelicKaty · 11/09/2025 07:43

Damnloginpopup · 11/09/2025 07:14

Maybe. Boredom being another possibility.

Then go and find another thread that doesn't bore you.

Beerpink · 11/09/2025 07:43

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 07:38

You’re completely missing the point here by trying to make this about a single policy. This was an attack on the right to political opinion, on the right to freedom of speech on the right to democracy. All the things the hard left hate. That is far bigger than the right to carry a gun or not.

Its not. People like him have enabled, fought for and advocated for a situation where even someone like him would be killed by gunfire. There’s only one way to have prevented his death: gun control.

IGaveSoManySigns · 11/09/2025 07:43

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 11/09/2025 07:41

I think we can all remember how sensitively the American right, far- or otherwise, treated the attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband.

Or how much interest they put in to the assassinations of the Minnesota Democrat state representatives a few months ago.

It's sad that there's been yet another victim of gun violence in the US but it's far from uncommon there. The place is awash with guns.

Yes and the people dividing this into a fair left v far right issue are only depending the divide and furthering the issue. We see violence across the political spectrum. The FBI have no clue who did this. Yet everyone has decided it was a left wing person, why? The assassination attempt on Trump was carried out by a right winger.

meeleymanatee · 11/09/2025 07:43

AngelicKaty · 11/09/2025 07:41

On this thread? That's a lie.

No on the other thread. Posts were deleted quickly but one said ‘I hope he felt pain’

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 07:43

Beerpink · 11/09/2025 07:39

Its not a case of deserving. It’s a case of he argued for a situation where gun ownership is rife and out of control, he was fine with school kids getting shot wasn’t he? Otherwise he would advocated for major reforms to remove the second amendment.

This shows a lack of understanding on so many levels.

RingoJuice · 11/09/2025 07:43

Beerpink · 11/09/2025 07:39

Its not a case of deserving. It’s a case of he argued for a situation where gun ownership is rife and out of control, he was fine with school kids getting shot wasn’t he? Otherwise he would advocated for major reforms to remove the second amendment.

Not that many conservatives arguing that mentally ill teens should have access to guns, and we want to add transgenderism to that list blocking gun licensing too.

(I grant there will be someone out there pushing for zero restrictions, just like some pro-choice activists push full term abortion. You get the loons on every issue like this).

Rosscameasdoody · 11/09/2025 07:43

hamstersarse · 11/09/2025 07:40

The implication of this view is that people on your side will always resort to violence if there are views they deem ‘dangerous’

Its good you admit it

I have no idea what you’re talking about. I was simply expressing an opinion. No implications, no innuendos, nothing to see here other than what was written. What you take from it is on you, not me.

BlueEyedBogWitch · 11/09/2025 07:44

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TiredCatLady · 11/09/2025 07:44

There is an assumption it’s “because of his beliefs”. That may be incorrect. Trump is feeding the narrative this is someone far left when the reality is, no one knows just yet. The Trump rally shooter was a Republican after all!

It was clearly a professional and had been meticulously planned. Someone wanted it to be public knowing it would likely result in him becoming a “martyr” if blamed on ideology.

Neverforgetwhothisisfor · 11/09/2025 07:45

ComfortFoodCafe · 11/09/2025 07:31

Would you say that about Hitler? I didnt think so, a dangerous man with dangerous views is gone.

Right, so views you don’t personally agree with, expressed rationally and politely in debate with willing volunteers, are “dangerous”, are they, and deserve to get their owner murdered?

Which is more dangerous - free debate, or a state of censorship where only people who agree with @comfortfoodcafe are allowed to go out in public?

(And by the way, when you start ad hitlerum it only makes your argument look even weaker.)

hamstersarse · 11/09/2025 07:45

Beerpink · 11/09/2025 07:43

Its not. People like him have enabled, fought for and advocated for a situation where even someone like him would be killed by gunfire. There’s only one way to have prevented his death: gun control.

You are very naive

There’s a term for it in Jungian psychology - the innocence complex. Most left wing females suffer from it.

AngelicKaty · 11/09/2025 07:45

hamstersarse · 11/09/2025 07:10

Post after post is ‘what did he expect given his ‘abhorrent’ views’?

There is just a hint of the evil beneath in those posts.

"Post after post"? Quote them all then - I'll wait.

Newsenmum · 11/09/2025 07:46

ComfortFoodCafe · 11/09/2025 07:31

Would you say that about Hitler? I didnt think so, a dangerous man with dangerous views is gone.

Pretty sure he wasnt that bad

hamstersarse · 11/09/2025 07:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Yeah he totally deserved that, right?

hamstersarse · 11/09/2025 07:47

AngelicKaty · 11/09/2025 07:45

"Post after post"? Quote them all then - I'll wait.

@BlueEyedBogWitch just did the latest one

meeleymanatee · 11/09/2025 07:47

Beerpink · 11/09/2025 07:43

Its not. People like him have enabled, fought for and advocated for a situation where even someone like him would be killed by gunfire. There’s only one way to have prevented his death: gun control.

the reality is gun control would not have been able to prevent his death as guns are far to pervasive in American society that gun control would not have stopped the shooter getting their hands on a gun.

i am American and I beleive in gun control but the reality is the only way to stop shootings would be gun eradication… which unfortunately I don’t see happening

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 07:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

So freedom of speech, of willingness to engage in public debate is a “shitty game” well we know where you stand.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.