Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Charlie Kirk dead

1000 replies

Booneymil · 10/09/2025 23:20

The last thread was taken down because of personal insults towards the man.

We should be able to have a thread about this news topic.

Report any insulting posts. Mumsnet can you please just delete the offending posts, instead of deleting the whole thread?

Thank you.

Charlie Kirk has died today. He was shot at a public talk that he was giving.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Booneymil · 11/09/2025 01:05

CJsGoldfish · 11/09/2025 01:02

No, there aren't. Lovely people do not support the vile, corrupt, misogynistic, racist and just plain spiteful actions occuring. They just don't. But they're your friends/colleagues/family, whatever so it's ok for you to cling to them being 'lovely'

I have not said it is fine to kill people like Charlie Kirk. I have said very little about Charlie Kirk, only that he was vile. And he was. He was no friend to women and was dripping with moral superiority. But you seem to have gone a little off track there and are angry over things never said 🤷‍♀️

Maybe it was the fact that I do not believe every death is a tragedy. Because it isn't. Quite separate from the rest of my post, it was just an idiotic statement I didn't want to go past

And you don't thinl that you have made idiotic statements?

Of course it is fine for people to vote for Trump. The same as it was fine for people tp vote for Kamala Harris. That is democracy. It is the Freedom to vote for who they want.

Why do you think you should be able to tell people who to vote for?

OP posts:
FirstCuppa · 11/09/2025 01:05

hihelenhi · 11/09/2025 00:54

The point stands. Simply being a supporter of Brexit does not equal being a neo nazi. You chose to conflate the two.

He was an active neo-nazi who also wanted to leave the EU.
I didn't conflate these two, that was his life!
FGS, talk about finding reasons to be offended. Not my fault if a murderer happens to have lots of nasty views in one basket case of his head.

Booneymil · 11/09/2025 01:07

Lovelyladiesarenotinsecure · 11/09/2025 01:03

If you look back at the posts I wrote about him stating a child should give birth to a rapists baby and you replied with ‘a man will always have an opinion as it’s his sperm.’ Don’t just reply again with ‘I never said that’ as everyone can see it if they just expand the reply to look at previous quotes

Yes they can see what I have written

And they will see that you are completely wrong.

OP posts:
hihelenhi · 11/09/2025 01:07

CJsGoldfish · 11/09/2025 01:02

No, there aren't. Lovely people do not support the vile, corrupt, misogynistic, racist and just plain spiteful actions occuring. They just don't. But they're your friends/colleagues/family, whatever so it's ok for you to cling to them being 'lovely'

I have not said it is fine to kill people like Charlie Kirk. I have said very little about Charlie Kirk, only that he was vile. And he was. He was no friend to women and was dripping with moral superiority. But you seem to have gone a little off track there and are angry over things never said 🤷‍♀️

Maybe it was the fact that I do not believe every death is a tragedy. Because it isn't. Quite separate from the rest of my post, it was just an idiotic statement I didn't want to go past

Deeply misguided people can be lovely. Wrong, but well-intentioned. Life is not black and white, I'm afraid.

Oh, and I'm not "clinging" to anything, ta. Or angry. Just commenting. You seem to be making an awful lot of assumptions. Talking of projection...

Vivi0 · 11/09/2025 01:08

FirstCuppa · 11/09/2025 01:05

He was an active neo-nazi who also wanted to leave the EU.
I didn't conflate these two, that was his life!
FGS, talk about finding reasons to be offended. Not my fault if a murderer happens to have lots of nasty views in one basket case of his head.

When was Charlie Kirk an active neo Nazi?

hihelenhi · 11/09/2025 01:09

FirstCuppa · 11/09/2025 01:05

He was an active neo-nazi who also wanted to leave the EU.
I didn't conflate these two, that was his life!
FGS, talk about finding reasons to be offended. Not my fault if a murderer happens to have lots of nasty views in one basket case of his head.

And? It read as the two being conflated. You didn't intend that, it seems. Fine.

Booneymil · 11/09/2025 01:10

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

justasking111 · 11/09/2025 01:12

Well it's a good job we have strict gun laws here. There's some posters I wouldn't trust with a spud gun reading this thread.

Usernameunavailableagain12 · 11/09/2025 01:13

This reply has been withdrawn

Message removed as it quotes a deleted post.

ThingsThatMakeYouGoHmmmmmmmmm · 11/09/2025 01:15

I agreed with some of his opinions. Disagreed with others. Just remember he had a wife, and a child. This, under any circumstances, is never acceptable. Society is diminished by his murder.

Clonakilla · 11/09/2025 01:16

Booneymil · 11/09/2025 00:43

Even if it is not their body, men are always going to have an opinion on abortion, as it is their sperm

What an incredibly naive statement, Men who are anti-choice aren’t protecting their sperm, they are seeking to control women. A reasonable number of them will have supported, paid for or arranged a termination when it suited them.

It is of course also nonsense to say every death is a tragedy. It’s not tragic when a 105 yr old dies peacefully after a long and happy life. Hitler’s death wasn’t tragic either. For different reasons.

TooBigForMyBoots · 11/09/2025 01:16

LuckyPeonies · 11/09/2025 01:05

A few of kirk’s quotes:

"I think empathy is a made up New Age term that has done a lot of damage." --Charlie Kirk

"Don't let mass shooting victims control the narrative with empathy." --Charlie Kirk

"Gun violence deaths are the cost of keeping our 2nd amendment rights." --Charlie Kirk

To give him his dues, he practised what he preached. He remained completely unaffected by victims of mass shootings. His dismissal of their suffering and refusal to learn stayed with him to the end.

He knew the cost of assault weapons in society. Now he's paid the price.

NoKidsSendDogs · 11/09/2025 01:18

AyeDeadOn · 10/09/2025 23:38

Anyone who thinks theyre making some clever point by saying he supported the right to bear arms so somehow is in any way more deserving of being assassinated because he said things people disagree with, is either a total idiot or being completely disingenuous.

That's not what they are saying though, is it? He avidly supported guns, he didnt bat and eye to the amount of deaths caused by guns in America and said that they were an acceptable consequence of everyone having access to a gun. Now he's an acceptable consequence according to his own logic. It has nothing to do with people supporting other people being shot, it's the pure poetic justice of it all.

And, he was a horrible man on top of that so it's just hard to be sad about it.

Dangermoos · 11/09/2025 01:19

AyeDeadOn · 10/09/2025 23:38

Anyone who thinks theyre making some clever point by saying he supported the right to bear arms so somehow is in any way more deserving of being assassinated because he said things people disagree with, is either a total idiot or being completely disingenuous.

And one of them is a massive advocate of Palestinians so the double standards continue. I will remember that when they are saying shame on you.

ohrodneyyouresuchplonker · 11/09/2025 01:20

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

RafaistheKingofClay · 11/09/2025 01:20

hamstersarse · 11/09/2025 00:40

Do you think George Floyd was an upstanding
member of society? Is that what you are saying?

How on earth have you read that into the PP’s comment.

I think the point is largely that some people seem to be held to higher standards than others. And higher standards than Kirk himself was ever held to, probably by the same people. And failure to meet those standards will almost certainly be used to demonstrate how awful the ‘libs’ or the left are.

Dangermoos · 11/09/2025 01:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Crushed23 · 11/09/2025 01:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

He wouldn’t “feel” anything. He’s dead.

Bananarama2000 · 11/09/2025 01:21

It’s another sad day for America I guess.
Not because I think it’s bad that that’s one less hate filled religious maniac preaching to college kids, but because the scarily far right (because our far right pales into insignificance by comparison to America’s) have now gained a martyr.
I suppose if you’re going to preach about the rights to bare arms and gun deaths being inevitable then you can’t be upset to end up a statistic.
Sad for his family, sure. Catastrophic for the already horrendous divide in America.

ArmyOfNorks · 11/09/2025 01:22

I have been living under a rock, for a variety of reasons, so have no idea who he was. I have not seen his name before.
However, this is a murder and is therefore horrific. No one has the right to take the life of another. His wife and children, wider family and friends must be utterly devastated. I know the pain of losing someone suddenly, and it is unbearable.

Booneymil · 11/09/2025 01:22

Clonakilla · 11/09/2025 01:16

What an incredibly naive statement, Men who are anti-choice aren’t protecting their sperm, they are seeking to control women. A reasonable number of them will have supported, paid for or arranged a termination when it suited them.

It is of course also nonsense to say every death is a tragedy. It’s not tragic when a 105 yr old dies peacefully after a long and happy life. Hitler’s death wasn’t tragic either. For different reasons.

Its not naive in any way. And again you are twisting my words. I didnt write "men who are anti choice" did I? I wrote the word "men"

Men that I know have told me that they have opinions on abortion, as it is their sperm that makes the baby.

I actually went to a philosophy group last week. The topic was abortion. A large number of men and women spoke about their experiences With abortiom

Some of the men in the group said that they felt an emotional attachment to the fetus , but that they still encouraged their partner to do what was best for her. If she wanted an abortion, they encouraged her.

So those men had an opinion on abortion, and were still pro abortion.

Of COURSE men are going to have an opinion on abortion

OP posts:
OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 11/09/2025 01:23

This reply has been deleted

Message removed as it quotes a deleted post.

The kind and compassionate left.

BlueEyedBogWitch · 11/09/2025 01:23

Bloody hell, the virtue signalling on this thread.

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 01:24

Booneymil · 11/09/2025 01:22

Its not naive in any way. And again you are twisting my words. I didnt write "men who are anti choice" did I? I wrote the word "men"

Men that I know have told me that they have opinions on abortion, as it is their sperm that makes the baby.

I actually went to a philosophy group last week. The topic was abortion. A large number of men and women spoke about their experiences With abortiom

Some of the men in the group said that they felt an emotional attachment to the fetus , but that they still encouraged their partner to do what was best for her. If she wanted an abortion, they encouraged her.

So those men had an opinion on abortion, and were still pro abortion.

Of COURSE men are going to have an opinion on abortion

Edited

Yes. The 'it's their sperm' applies more to personal situations tho, not to general situations where they have to judge what the law should be

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread