Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread 32 Starmer - Corn Moon

1000 replies

DuncinToffee · 06/09/2025 11:34

Pull up a chair for some friendly chit chat about politics and beyond

Taxes optional but greatly appreciated.

Previous thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5402603-thread-31-starmer-september-rain?page=40&reply=146949615

OP posts:
Thread gallery
85
Karistyleaftea · 11/09/2025 15:20

About time the BBC put Farage under scrutiny.
Also, an extremely hard no to Zak Polanski and before Sir Keir was at the helm I voted Green. No more.
A party whose members tipped out Adrian and Carla just like that is not for me.
Also, the hardest no ever to George Osborne for ambassador to the USA. It was bad enough having Lord Dave but not another architect of austerity in a position of influence. The grief those two caused to people in the UK.
In my opinion.

Evenstar · 11/09/2025 15:20

Good to see that our kids are still being protected 🙄

Thread 32 Starmer - Corn Moon
SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 15:30

tobee · 11/09/2025 12:43

The Greens electing Zack Polanski show they are not a serious party. Or, I should, continuing to not be a serious party.

Edited

Well they've had 40 years ...

SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 15:36

bombastix · 11/09/2025 12:48

Well I won’t be sanguine about Starmer’s decision on Mandelson. Mandelson had all perfect criteria for the job. He is extremely good with powerful people and he has masses of experience in international trade. But Epstein would have been known about at the point of his appointment. Sorry, there are some serious questions here on the vetting and what was known when he got the job.

If you want some pretzel conspiracy logic, Agent Mandelson knew where the bodies were buried and can now be withdrawn, his mission complete.

Zonder · 11/09/2025 15:39

Alexandra2001 · 11/09/2025 12:34

Listened to him on Any Questions, says the right things, Wealth tax, better public services, net zero... etc etc but easy to do when no chance atm of power.

I'm liking the LD's more and more.

At least he's saying the right things. Are we going to just assume he won't do them, but assume LD will?

I have NO time for LD. Our local LDs are a bunch of fibbers. You should see the manipulation of graphs and charts they put on their leaflets. Our LD MP is a waste of space. I used to think they might be ok but based on my experience of the local party I'm right off them. Shame because I like Ed Davey.

Zonder · 11/09/2025 15:40

cardibach · 11/09/2025 13:33

I like a lot of what he’s saying, especially on the economy, but I’ve read that he thinks we should leave NATO - I can’t agree with or support that. We need to be less isolated, not more.

That's a bit rubbish. Disappointed he thinks that. I'm right with you.

SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 15:44

There really is such a thing as letting perfection be the enemy of progress.

cardibach · 11/09/2025 15:45

Zonder · 11/09/2025 15:40

That's a bit rubbish. Disappointed he thinks that. I'm right with you.

I’ve been looking it up. It’s not a clear intention to pull out but it makes me uneasy. Seems to be more a distrust of Trump, but it doesn’t make sense.

“Asked about the comments on Nato, Polanski said that while he maintained the alliance was untenable under a Trump-led US, he did not advocate immediate UK withdrawal, only if an alternative European defence alliance could be set up, a process he said could take years.”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/03/green-party-leader-zack-polanski-distances-corbyn-electoral-pact

New Green leader Polanski distances party from electoral pact with Corbyn

Leftist would need to see ‘very strong arguments’ before agreeing a deal with party launched by ex-Labour leader

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/03/green-party-leader-zack-polanski-distances-corbyn-electoral-pact

cardibach · 11/09/2025 15:48

SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 15:44

There really is such a thing as letting perfection be the enemy of progress.

There is, and reading his more recent comments it’s not as bad as I feared (see above) but it’s a fair,y serious policy disagreement I have with him there…

SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 15:52

cardibach · 11/09/2025 15:48

There is, and reading his more recent comments it’s not as bad as I feared (see above) but it’s a fair,y serious policy disagreement I have with him there…

I love the idea of the Greens. DM did too.

But then I chose to do sciencey things and all of a sudden homespun yogurt and lentil surprise rather lost their appeal.

placemats · 11/09/2025 15:59

"Green Party leader Carla Denyer has spent one of the highest amounts for a single candidate in this campaign period - £39,299 - targeting voters in her desired constituency of Bristol Central."

Taken from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/general-election-social-media-campaigns-cost-b2563996.html

Polanski is an elected member of the London Assembly. He previously stood for the Lib Dems in local elections for Camden Borough council and was unsuccessful.

Inside election social media campaign costs as Labour outspends all parties combined

Labour has spent over £2.4m since May 22 on Meta and Google ads alone

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/general-election-social-media-campaigns-cost-b2563996.html

Piggywaspushed · 11/09/2025 16:16

SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 15:52

I love the idea of the Greens. DM did too.

But then I chose to do sciencey things and all of a sudden homespun yogurt and lentil surprise rather lost their appeal.

I do think that is rather a sneering dismissal of the Greens , tbh jane - often found on the more RW type threads that view Green/left views as silly and not grounded in the reality of the pragmatic right wing- see also blue hair. Clearly, they do neither of those things and I am never sure quite what it is shorthand for.

There are scientists who vote Green. Actually quite a lot of them especially in climate science and environmental fields.

Piggywaspushed · 11/09/2025 16:19

PandoraSocks · 11/09/2025 11:58

“328 days blood on your hands.”

Does anyone know what this means?

I haven't done the maths but I assume a reference to Gaza?

itsgettingweird · 11/09/2025 16:28

I think the greens have been very underestimated .

They set up as a party way enforce climate change became something we experienced rather than predicted .

I also think we are going to need to to step up much more in the coming years. I would love a Labour/ green coalition but it needs to be further to the left than Labour is currently heading.

I don’t want leave nato nor think we should but the idea of a closer ties with Europe and a European version interests me. I’d need more details to decide if I agree with them plan outright or not.

SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 16:29

Piggywaspushed · 11/09/2025 16:16

I do think that is rather a sneering dismissal of the Greens , tbh jane - often found on the more RW type threads that view Green/left views as silly and not grounded in the reality of the pragmatic right wing- see also blue hair. Clearly, they do neither of those things and I am never sure quite what it is shorthand for.

There are scientists who vote Green. Actually quite a lot of them especially in climate science and environmental fields.

I promise I will look again ... but can remember Jonathon (now Lord) Porritt when the Ecology party were getting a buzz.

Karistyleaftea · 11/09/2025 16:30

So who is funding Polanski?
There is always somebody.

placemats · 11/09/2025 16:40

ExxonMobil suppressed man made climate change and warming from as early as the late 70s, which of course was noted by Eunice Foot in 1856. Her work was ignored.

SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 16:44

placemats · 11/09/2025 16:40

ExxonMobil suppressed man made climate change and warming from as early as the late 70s, which of course was noted by Eunice Foot in 1856. Her work was ignored.

See this is partly where I slightly lose patience.

Fuck the "man made" bit. I mean what has that got to do with the price of fish ?

The climate changes. It's what it does. It's what it always does. It's what it will do.

Rather than getting involved in the most useless argument since transubstantiation, why not just accept it and fucking deal with it ? Because that is all we can do. Anyone who thinks there is the remotest chance of affecting it in electoral timescales is a bit thick. Or disingenuous. Or playing to an agenda.

We've known climate changes since before recorded history. It's a mystery why it's so important to some people why. I mean we still don't know why gravity works, but seem to have managed to work around it.

grannycake · 11/09/2025 16:53

I can’t vote Lib Dem. My mother (whose views on immigrants are somewhat to the right of Reform) was a Lin Dem councillor for her home in the largest city close to me and rose through its ranks to become Lady Mayoress. Have they no vetting!!

Alexandra2001 · 11/09/2025 17:07

Zonder · 11/09/2025 15:39

At least he's saying the right things. Are we going to just assume he won't do them, but assume LD will?

I have NO time for LD. Our local LDs are a bunch of fibbers. You should see the manipulation of graphs and charts they put on their leaflets. Our LD MP is a waste of space. I used to think they might be ok but based on my experience of the local party I'm right off them. Shame because I like Ed Davey.

I honestly don't know, every party seems awful but Davy seems more principled.

Alexandra2001 · 11/09/2025 17:09

SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 16:44

See this is partly where I slightly lose patience.

Fuck the "man made" bit. I mean what has that got to do with the price of fish ?

The climate changes. It's what it does. It's what it always does. It's what it will do.

Rather than getting involved in the most useless argument since transubstantiation, why not just accept it and fucking deal with it ? Because that is all we can do. Anyone who thinks there is the remotest chance of affecting it in electoral timescales is a bit thick. Or disingenuous. Or playing to an agenda.

We've known climate changes since before recorded history. It's a mystery why it's so important to some people why. I mean we still don't know why gravity works, but seem to have managed to work around it.

Its the rate of change, it may not be possible to "deal with it"

Perhaps we should all be looking beyond electoral cycles....

PandoraSocks · 11/09/2025 17:31

Piggywaspushed · 11/09/2025 16:19

I haven't done the maths but I assume a reference to Gaza?

Google says 328 days ago was 17 Oct 2024. So you could be right.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events/2024_October_17

SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 17:31

Alexandra2001 · 11/09/2025 17:09

Its the rate of change, it may not be possible to "deal with it"

Perhaps we should all be looking beyond electoral cycles....

I think we are agreeing from different ends ?

placemats · 11/09/2025 17:33

SerendipityJane · 11/09/2025 16:44

See this is partly where I slightly lose patience.

Fuck the "man made" bit. I mean what has that got to do with the price of fish ?

The climate changes. It's what it does. It's what it always does. It's what it will do.

Rather than getting involved in the most useless argument since transubstantiation, why not just accept it and fucking deal with it ? Because that is all we can do. Anyone who thinks there is the remotest chance of affecting it in electoral timescales is a bit thick. Or disingenuous. Or playing to an agenda.

We've known climate changes since before recorded history. It's a mystery why it's so important to some people why. I mean we still don't know why gravity works, but seem to have managed to work around it.

Pumping out carbon dioxide from fuels buried deep within the earth's crust at a rate knots is real. Deal with it.

Yes climate changes. But I'm presuming you know the difference between weather and climate. And also that human activity has an effect on water and air pollution.

Take as an example the great fogs/smogs of London. This resulted in the Clean Air Act 1956, 4 years after the great London smog.

Also the Great Stink in London after a heatwave which resulted in sewers Londoners still use today. Joseph Balzalgette was the engineer and a saviour of people because his design helped stop cholera outbreaks.

Piggywaspushed · 11/09/2025 17:41

I taught his great granddaughter. That's how I learnt how to pronounce him and who he was. Very cool.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.