So our judiciary ruled that the EHCR prevents councils from enforcing existing laws - which would require planning consent for a hotel to be repurposed as an asylum seekers centre - since if there was contagion and other AS accomodation closed, the AS would have nowhere to stay and would be destitite, which breaches their human rights.
But they ruled that the EHCR can't prevent the government from imposing a new tax which will prevent children from accessing an education which their parents chose/meets their needs since the tax - which will bring in no revenue and is purely punitive - is causing schools to close at twice the usual rate. Even though they explicitly admitted in the judgement that it would harm the childrens' human rights.
And this isn't 2-tier justice.
I'm starting to think that Jenrick is right. Exiting EHCR is necessary but it won't be enough. The activist judiciary who abuse it will still find other ways to undermine the UK unless they are made accountable.
www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/08/15/time-to-sack-activist-judges-says-robert-jenrick/