Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Do the people being arrested for Palestine Action not know about the sledgehammer attack?

406 replies

noblegiraffe · 10/08/2025 10:40

With 500-odd people having been arrested for expressing support for proscribed terrorist organisation Palestine Action, I'm just baffled as to why they are willing to get a criminal record which could bar them from travel to the USA and work in education for an organisation whose members attacked police officers with a sledgehammer.

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/disturbing-sledgehammer-attack-police-during-9463071

Regardless of whether this group should be proscribed as a terrorist organisation, surely no one should look at that and think 'yeah, that's a group I think should be allowed to continue to do its thing, attack a few more police officers with sledgehammers, that's the hill I'm willing to die on.'

Wouldn't you think 'I'm not sure if they should be proscribed as terrorists, but given the sledgehammer attack, I'm not going to turn up with banners in support and be arrested for them, I'll just get on with protesting the genocide instead because that's a better cause'.

So do they not know about the violence? Or do they not care and are willing to support violent organisations?

(note this is not a thread for debating Gaza, I want to talk about British people who are absolutely legally allowed to protest genocide but aren't allowed to support proscribed terrorist organisations - which is also not allowed on MN).

Disturbing sledgehammer attack during prison van ram raid

Police officers were attacked with a sledgehammer while activists also wielded axes, whips and other weapons

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/disturbing-sledgehammer-attack-police-during-9463071

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
taxidriver · 11/08/2025 12:00

i doubt they went on a protest thinking they would be arrested tbh

noblegiraffe · 11/08/2025 12:00

MrsSkylerWhite · 11/08/2025 11:57

They are protesting against the deliberate starvation of one incredibly wealthy state and the might of its western funded military machine against the deliberate starvation of potentially millions of some of the most vulnerable civilians on the planet at this time, obviously.

Not when they say “we support Palestine Action” they aren’t.

Then they are deliberately expressing support for a proscribed terrorist organisation which is an entirely different protest.

OP posts:
noblegiraffe · 11/08/2025 12:02

Plantatreetoday · 11/08/2025 11:57

What evidence ‘out there’ that constitutes terrorism.

If the evidence is ‘out there’ then the UN will be aware of it. And they all disagree

Edited

The UN didn’t mention violence and injuring people in that statement so I’m not convinced they’re fully aware. That or they are being dishonest, which isn’t great.

OP posts:
Beachtastic · 11/08/2025 12:03

taxidriver · 11/08/2025 12:00

i doubt they went on a protest thinking they would be arrested tbh

I guess not, if they can't read...?

Plantatreetoday · 11/08/2025 12:03

Livelovebehappy · 11/08/2025 11:58

The government have clearly said there is lots of information they have that we're not privy to suggesting PA are very dangerous to the security of the UK. I'm putting my trust in the Governmrnt on this occasion rather than a couple of random terrorist sympathisers on MN who seem to be set on putting us all in harms way to fit their own agendas. I'm guessing you also sympathise with those poor misunderstood guys Hamas too....

I don’t blindly put my trust in the Government
One only has to remember the Brexit lies to know doing that blindly is unwise
They simply want to shut down free speech. We see that as policy with Angela Raynor.
This is just the beginning. Such a shame people don’t see through that

noblegiraffe · 11/08/2025 12:04

taxidriver · 11/08/2025 12:00

i doubt they went on a protest thinking they would be arrested tbh

They did, it was the point of the protest. They wanted to overwhelm the police with the number of arrests needed to be made, it was all planned.

OP posts:
zerofeeling · 11/08/2025 12:04

Browniesforbreakfast · 11/08/2025 11:58

Destroying our defence capability is a very big deal.

Not such a big deal that they bother with adequate security though.

Plantatreetoday · 11/08/2025 12:06

Beachtastic · 11/08/2025 12:03

I guess not, if they can't read...?

I’m sure they knew the potential for arrest @taxidriverthat’s what has become of this country

and as pensioners they’ve played a blinder. It’s not like it’s going to affect their employability. I’m sure they don’t care. One last stand to save this country from Big Brother.

noblegiraffe · 11/08/2025 12:08

Plantatreetoday · 11/08/2025 12:06

I’m sure they knew the potential for arrest @taxidriverthat’s what has become of this country

and as pensioners they’ve played a blinder. It’s not like it’s going to affect their employability. I’m sure they don’t care. One last stand to save this country from Big Brother.

Yes, gotta fight for the right to assault people with sledgehammers.

OP posts:
notimagain · 11/08/2025 12:09

Anyone supposedly surprised at how easily the protestors got onto Brize simply hasn't been paying attention to Defence spending over the last three decades plus.....

If you want 24/7 airfield perimeter or even just airfield apron guarding you need a much bigger RAF than we have now...that costs and HMG and you, the voter, have decided taxpayers money must go elsewhere.

Deliberately damaging aircraft and some of their sub-systems can in some circumstances have lethal consequences, so the HMG response isn't simply down to red faces at MOD, someone feels an example probably needs to be set (and the accused should probably thank their lucky stars the Aviation Security Act hasn't been brought into play).

Have to also say I'm surprised at that the tone of some responses that are almost hinting that MOD/RAF "were asking for it"..not a good look.

OneCoralCat · 11/08/2025 12:09

Plantatreetoday · 11/08/2025 11:43

So based on intelligence.
Doesnt it occur that’s an excuse for we haven’t got anything that actually constitutes terrorism. So we’ll fudge it and call it intelligence. So the papers can’t request a FOI

PAs modus operandi isn’t terrorism. Never has been.

In terms of others. Gosh I’d have to do a lot of derailing homework on that one. Can I include Anne Boleyn was beheaded on a trumped up charge

Edited

No, it doesn’t occur to me for that to be the case here any more than it occurs to me that the reason the police haven’t released the CCTV in the latest Tommy Robinson case is because they’re hiding his innocence, rather than because it’s part of an ongoing investigation.

We have strict laws around discussing ongoing cases in order not to prejudice them and rightly so.

There are plenty of ways to support Palestine than without referencing this specific group.

Beachtastic · 11/08/2025 12:10

Unfortunately I think PA are playing the "oppressed" card just as Hamas did immediately after 7 Oct, and it's worked really well.

ThreeFeetTall · 11/08/2025 12:10

What was the plane going to be used for? Why did they attack it?

Plantatreetoday · 11/08/2025 12:18

noblegiraffe · 11/08/2025 12:08

Yes, gotta fight for the right to assault people with sledgehammers.

Noble. I’ve already posted the charges against PA. You know that they didn’t assault anyone with sledgehammers or they would have been charged with doing so. The Bristol article you posted is not correct
Its lies

notimagain · 11/08/2025 12:19

ThreeFeetTall · 11/08/2025 12:10

What was the plane going to be used for? Why did they attack it?

Probably one of three things, shifting freight (which could have been aid) shifting people or refuelling RAF aircraft either involved in policing UK airspace or for example operating supporting Ukraine.

What it wasn't was an intelligence gathering aircraft and what it couldn't do was refuel Israeli (or for that matter USAF) aircraft.

I wonder if the PA heroes were aware of any of that or even cared.

MrsSkylerWhite · 11/08/2025 12:20

noblegiraffe · 11/08/2025 12:00

Not when they say “we support Palestine Action” they aren’t.

Then they are deliberately expressing support for a proscribed terrorist organisation which is an entirely different protest.

An organisation that many people of widely differing political opinions have publicly stated should never have been prescribed as such. Murdoch’s Times has even opined that it was a mistake.
Government appears to have made the impossible, possible and brought together left, right and centre.
Big mistake, playing into the hands of Farage, Tice and their baying hounds.

Plantatreetoday · 11/08/2025 12:20

judge allowing PA to challenge home office

Do the people being arrested for Palestine Action not know about the sledgehammer attack?
Do the people being arrested for Palestine Action not know about the sledgehammer attack?
MrsSkylerWhite · 11/08/2025 12:21

noblegiraffe · 11/08/2025 12:04

They did, it was the point of the protest. They wanted to overwhelm the police with the number of arrests needed to be made, it was all planned.

If so, Government was incredibly short-sighted falling for it. There will probably be double the number next weekend.

CatsLikeBoxes · 11/08/2025 12:24

Surely it is relevant to consider what the intention was behind the incident in the Op... If their (PA) plan was to use violence against people in order to influence the decisions of a government, I can see how that can be defined as terrorism.

If the intention of the group was to destroy property, but when stopped by police, some individuals within the group were violent in response to that, I don't see why that in itself constitutes terrorism.

I think it is reasonable for people to have concerns at how laws are used to control what people can and can't do.

This is an interesting article which expresses it better than I can.

https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption/2025/08/08/why-it-matters-whether-palestine-action-are-really-terrorists/

Why it matters whether Palestine Action are really terrorists | Centre for the Study of Corruption

https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption/2025/08/08/why-it-matters-whether-palestine-action-are-really-terrorists/

MrsSkylerWhite · 11/08/2025 12:26

Destroying property is criminal damage, not terrorism. As it was at Greenham Common.

Beachtastic · 11/08/2025 12:28

Why is it so desperately urgent to reinstate an organisation under suspicion of being a terrorist group? They have challenged it, the UN has criticised the decision, so what? Things will eventually come out in the wash, and in the meantime I hope the UK government's priority is to protect our national security rather than pander to fashion.

There are plenty of ways to "support Palestine" without engaging with this bunch of rascals 😊 much less martyring yourself to their cause.

Demanding and demonstrating against evidence-based decisions serves only to underline the victim/oppressor narrative that groups like PA and Hamas have twisted very successfully to suit their purposes.

noblegiraffe · 11/08/2025 12:28

Plantatreetoday · 11/08/2025 12:18

Noble. I’ve already posted the charges against PA. You know that they didn’t assault anyone with sledgehammers or they would have been charged with doing so. The Bristol article you posted is not correct
Its lies

And I cut and pasted the bit from your report that showed the charges that back up the news report. "Violent disorder, grievous bodily harm with intent, two counts of actual bodily harm, and aggravated burglary using a sledgehammer as an offensive weapon"

Aggravated burglary is burglary with violence or the threat of violence, an offensive weapon is anything carried which is adapted or intended to cause injury to someone. This guy was charged with carrying a sledgehammer as an offensive weapon and causing grievous bodily harm and actual bodily harm.

What part of that suggests that the original report of police officers being injured with a sledgehammer was incorrect?

Do the people being arrested for Palestine Action not know about the sledgehammer attack?
OP posts:
CautiousLurker01 · 11/08/2025 12:29

CatsLikeBoxes · 11/08/2025 12:24

Surely it is relevant to consider what the intention was behind the incident in the Op... If their (PA) plan was to use violence against people in order to influence the decisions of a government, I can see how that can be defined as terrorism.

If the intention of the group was to destroy property, but when stopped by police, some individuals within the group were violent in response to that, I don't see why that in itself constitutes terrorism.

I think it is reasonable for people to have concerns at how laws are used to control what people can and can't do.

This is an interesting article which expresses it better than I can.

https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption/2025/08/08/why-it-matters-whether-palestine-action-are-really-terrorists/

Acc to the Guardian (article about a hour ago) the govt spokesperson said they cause £7m damage. I find it hard to understand how that can be achieved without some level of violence? Clearly more than slinging a bit of paint was involved - so I suspect more occurred but has not been shared because the legal case/investigation is ongoing.

I fully accept that we should not take everything the government (this one, the last one, the next one) says at face value, but the idea that we should treat absolutely everything as lies and misinformation is the route to anarchy. This conspiracy/misinformation shit needs to stop before we end up with real riots on the streets.

noblegiraffe · 11/08/2025 12:32

Beachtastic · 11/08/2025 12:28

Why is it so desperately urgent to reinstate an organisation under suspicion of being a terrorist group? They have challenged it, the UN has criticised the decision, so what? Things will eventually come out in the wash, and in the meantime I hope the UK government's priority is to protect our national security rather than pander to fashion.

There are plenty of ways to "support Palestine" without engaging with this bunch of rascals 😊 much less martyring yourself to their cause.

Demanding and demonstrating against evidence-based decisions serves only to underline the victim/oppressor narrative that groups like PA and Hamas have twisted very successfully to suit their purposes.

Well yes, Palestine Action won the right to appeal the decision in court. Why bother inviting arrest for a violent group before the process has been followed?

OP posts:
MrsSkylerWhite · 11/08/2025 12:32

Beachtastic · 11/08/2025 12:28

Why is it so desperately urgent to reinstate an organisation under suspicion of being a terrorist group? They have challenged it, the UN has criticised the decision, so what? Things will eventually come out in the wash, and in the meantime I hope the UK government's priority is to protect our national security rather than pander to fashion.

There are plenty of ways to "support Palestine" without engaging with this bunch of rascals 😊 much less martyring yourself to their cause.

Demanding and demonstrating against evidence-based decisions serves only to underline the victim/oppressor narrative that groups like PA and Hamas have twisted very successfully to suit their purposes.

“Fashion”, “rascals”? Behave yourself.

These people are protesting with utmost conviction against a policy of the deliberate starvation of millions by one of the most powerful states on this planet.

Swipe left for the next trending thread