@TryonemoretimeFirst off, save your patronising apologies. No one's dead I terminated a tiny cluster of cells, so stop trying to make it sound like some emotional tragedy. My mind wasn’t all over the place, I made a calm, considered decision that would have had a massive impact on my future.
You’re all for adoption, but a study from the American Academy of Pediatrics found that 1 in 4 adopted children might need mental health services. So, how do you justify pushing for more children to be adopted when so many of them will face trauma as a result of being abandoned in the first place? It’s not just some theoretical risk – it’s a reality that can have a lasting impact. Yet you’re ignoring all that in favour of a narrative that doesn’t take into account the harm that can come from forcing unwanted children into the system.
You quote a handful of adults who weren't traumatised by being abandoned as babies? How convenient. But let’s be real – that’s a tiny sample size compared to the many more who are. Adoption statistics in the UK show that 5-10% of adoptions fail each year, meaning even more children end up with trauma. And that’s not even counting the ripple effect it’ll have on future generations if that trauma isn’t treated.
So, let’s do some simple maths: if the 330,000 abortions weren’t carried out and women were forced to give birth – just like you’d prefer – that would barely make a dent in the bigger picture. We’re talking about 320,000 unwanted children, forced into life. Who’s going to look after them? Who’s going to provide the therapy for kids who end up in care because their biological mothers were forced to carry a pregnancy they didn’t want?
Don’t kid yourself into thinking you’re pro-life – you’re pro-forced birth.
I won’t be responding to you again as you are making my extremely angry