Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Taxes to rise to fund PIP 2

350 replies

Viviennemary · 28/06/2025 21:06

I saw the other thread was full. Still I look forward to the vote which is on Tuesday. Sky news called him two Tier Keir. Most unfair thing ever if this passes.

OP posts:
PandoraSocks · 29/06/2025 20:22

Fsads · 29/06/2025 20:17

No one is entitled to luxuries. Not even me a working person.

So you don't think that society should aspire to a decent standard of living for everyone? Good food, a decent home, a social life, the occasional holiday? All that is good for the economy as well as the individual.

PandoraSocks · 29/06/2025 20:23

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 20:22

There always has to be a scapegoat, so that the masses don't look up to what the people hoarding all the wealth are doing. Disabled people are just the latest, in a long line of scapegoats being done over.

Yep. At least immigrants are getting a break from being the scapegoat for a few days.

Fsads · 29/06/2025 20:25

The way I see it is that if someone doesn't work at all then the government payments they get should be enough to meet the essentials. If they get money from elsewhere (friends, family, relatives or after a lot of savings) then yeah sure.

I definitely feel that at a bare minimum they should have enough money to meet groceries z rent, utilities

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 20:25

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 20:01

Child benefit is £26.05 per child weekly. Would take quite a bit of saving to go on holiday.

And low rate pip is £29.50 a week how much is the child element of universal credit?

RoseofRoses · 29/06/2025 20:25

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 20:25

PandoraSocks · 29/06/2025 20:23

Yep. At least immigrants are getting a break from being the scapegoat for a few days.

Yes, just a tiny reprieve, mind. The media will go full force on them again, soon.

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 20:27

Fsads · 29/06/2025 20:25

The way I see it is that if someone doesn't work at all then the government payments they get should be enough to meet the essentials. If they get money from elsewhere (friends, family, relatives or after a lot of savings) then yeah sure.

I definitely feel that at a bare minimum they should have enough money to meet groceries z rent, utilities

How kind of you, I'm sure.

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 29/06/2025 20:28

Fsads · 29/06/2025 19:33

I'm open to have my mind changed but if someone is completely unable to work due to health issues then the sum of their welfare money they get should be enough to sustain them. Food, water, heating, utility bills etc.

No one is entitled to luxuries. There are working people who can't afford passports and can't afford to go abroad.

Imo someone who cannot work due to their health deserves enough to have some basic standard of life provided but the taxpayer cannot needlessly subsidise.

"Sorry you've got a brain tumour. On the bright side, we're going to keep you barely scraping by in poverty so you'll be glad when you die!".

PandoraSocks · 29/06/2025 20:28

Fsads · 29/06/2025 20:25

The way I see it is that if someone doesn't work at all then the government payments they get should be enough to meet the essentials. If they get money from elsewhere (friends, family, relatives or after a lot of savings) then yeah sure.

I definitely feel that at a bare minimum they should have enough money to meet groceries z rent, utilities

And what about the extra expenses that being disabled can involve?

You just don't get it.

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 20:32

justkeepswimingswiming · 29/06/2025 20:19

God beforbid a disabled person pays £10.99 for Netflix to take their mind off their pain. Its a luxury isn’t it?
End of the day the MPs claim expenses for alcohol, massive food allowances, second homes, private jets yet your angry at disabled people?

The cheapest Netflix is £5.99pm.
People who would begrudge someone on disability benefits that meagre little luxury can just fuck off.

MyNameIsX · 29/06/2025 20:33

Blame Labour.

They have everyone at each other’s throats.

The PS VAT raid, the WFA, NI, the attack on non-doms/IHT, and Reeves will come again - she will be compelled to freeze income tax bands etc.

The combination of viciousness and incompetence is beyond toxic.

CortadoPlease · 29/06/2025 20:34

Viviennemary · 29/06/2025 11:44

That would be fine by me. As alas I haven't got £10m. But I would imagine that anyone who has will be straight on to their accountant to avoid the tax.

Why? It’s about 4 months of average asset price growth. Hardly going to tip multimillionaires into penury.

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 20:34

Fsads · 29/06/2025 20:25

The way I see it is that if someone doesn't work at all then the government payments they get should be enough to meet the essentials. If they get money from elsewhere (friends, family, relatives or after a lot of savings) then yeah sure.

I definitely feel that at a bare minimum they should have enough money to meet groceries z rent, utilities

Stay humble. This could be you in a matter of seconds.

Fsads · 29/06/2025 20:34

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 19:15

I remember PP saying about the autistic student using a PIP back payment to go on holiday before.
PIP can take ages to get, especially if you have to go to tribunal, so some people can end up with back payments of a couple of £grand.
You can't retrospectively pay for any care you needs you had. Before the student was awarded, any extra costs would have been paid for by them or their care needs just not met.
And when they get a lump sump from backpay... they can spend it on what they want. I hope the student had a great time on holiday.

I mean they managed without PIP just fine. They recently got a 1st in their integrated physics masters. Very happy for them obviously but they thrived and succeeded at university without government support. They also got the maximum maintenance loam (and then some). At some point the taxpayer can't fund everything.

Helpmefindmysoul · 29/06/2025 20:36

Ohthatsabitshit · 29/06/2025 20:09

You seem to believe that you speak for all high incomes me households, you REALLY don’t. Most of my cohort at university and the vast majority of my friends and family fall into this bracket and very very few of them aren’t willing to pay more to provide what is necessary. All of us should value the social support, in health, and in education, and in benefits for those who are disabled or unable to work. Only a blinkered fool would want to live in a country that didn’t provide this kind of support.

@Ohthatsabitshit I am all on board for supporting society and whilst you and your friends in the higher bracket might be willing to the majority of people in the higher tax bracket or not don’t want to pay more taxes.
I do fall under the disability act but get no support? I pay for the NHS prescription certificate as I don’t qualify for an exemption despite having a condition that will never be cured and can only be managed?
If the majority of higher earners like you, your friends and family were happy to pay the higher taxes then there wouldn’t be a high number of individuals taking themselves and their families out of the country to keep the money they earn.
Lets be realistic we are loosing tons of doctors / dentists who may be leaving for a better quality of life but the reality is they’re higher tax payers and them leaving not only causes issues for public services but also on taxable income for the country.
You might call it a blinkered fool but where does one draw the line? As I said in my original post some conditions should be reassessed and alternative therapies provided to support them, I’ve not said remove support but all my suggestions were on how to increase the public purse through alternative methods not just slap on tax certain households.
Also you stated higher earning households. So does that mean we should change taxation methods so that we are not taxed on individual income? The government is brilliant when taxing us all individually at the point of earning but when it comes to handing out to those who may need it then everything is household based.
I am not trying to argue you with you, I salute you if you’re happy to pay more tax but not seeing the benefits of that tax isn’t helpful to anyone.

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 20:37

MyNameIsX · 29/06/2025 20:33

Blame Labour.

They have everyone at each other’s throats.

The PS VAT raid, the WFA, NI, the attack on non-doms/IHT, and Reeves will come again - she will be compelled to freeze income tax bands etc.

The combination of viciousness and incompetence is beyond toxic.

Government like to stir the pot with the general public as it takes the focus of them. Yeah blame the person with cancer or down syndrome or the person with brain damage from getting enough money for their medical needs but dont blame the government for the amount they spend in expenses or the amount they waste making dumb decisions that never end up happening.

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 20:37

Fsads · 29/06/2025 20:34

I mean they managed without PIP just fine. They recently got a 1st in their integrated physics masters. Very happy for them obviously but they thrived and succeeded at university without government support. They also got the maximum maintenance loam (and then some). At some point the taxpayer can't fund everything.

Why are you begrudging them their PIP? They were awarded it after assessment, and deemed to need it.

My DP is autistic and has a masters degree. But he struggles a lot in the other areas of his life... and that is why he was diagnosed.

Fearfulsaints · 29/06/2025 20:39

To be fair to the 'no luxuries' poster.

The aim of PIP isn't to provide luxuries. The state isn't trying to do that.

It's a proxy for care and mobility costs, with a bit of dignity of disabled people chose how they buy that care /mobility.

Buzyizzy217 · 29/06/2025 20:41

Maybe what you consider a necessity, disabled consider a luxury? I’ve heard so many times, I couldn’t live without my …:. and yes, people are surprised at what I do without.

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 20:41

Helpmefindmysoul · 29/06/2025 20:36

@Ohthatsabitshit I am all on board for supporting society and whilst you and your friends in the higher bracket might be willing to the majority of people in the higher tax bracket or not don’t want to pay more taxes.
I do fall under the disability act but get no support? I pay for the NHS prescription certificate as I don’t qualify for an exemption despite having a condition that will never be cured and can only be managed?
If the majority of higher earners like you, your friends and family were happy to pay the higher taxes then there wouldn’t be a high number of individuals taking themselves and their families out of the country to keep the money they earn.
Lets be realistic we are loosing tons of doctors / dentists who may be leaving for a better quality of life but the reality is they’re higher tax payers and them leaving not only causes issues for public services but also on taxable income for the country.
You might call it a blinkered fool but where does one draw the line? As I said in my original post some conditions should be reassessed and alternative therapies provided to support them, I’ve not said remove support but all my suggestions were on how to increase the public purse through alternative methods not just slap on tax certain households.
Also you stated higher earning households. So does that mean we should change taxation methods so that we are not taxed on individual income? The government is brilliant when taxing us all individually at the point of earning but when it comes to handing out to those who may need it then everything is household based.
I am not trying to argue you with you, I salute you if you’re happy to pay more tax but not seeing the benefits of that tax isn’t helpful to anyone.

You can get a prescription pre payment certificate to help with cost of prescriptions before I got medical exemption for hypothyroidism as my prescriptions would of been ridiculous as I take about 50 ish pills a day and am only allowed a week at a time at one point i was on dailies so I dread to think what the cost would of been

Buzyizzy217 · 29/06/2025 20:43

Fearfulsaints · 29/06/2025 20:39

To be fair to the 'no luxuries' poster.

The aim of PIP isn't to provide luxuries. The state isn't trying to do that.

It's a proxy for care and mobility costs, with a bit of dignity of disabled people chose how they buy that care /mobility.

Plus adaptations and equipment needed. Just remember 1:6 of us has arthritis which is exhausting, painful, debilitating and frustrating all at the same time.

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 20:45

Fearfulsaints · 29/06/2025 20:39

To be fair to the 'no luxuries' poster.

The aim of PIP isn't to provide luxuries. The state isn't trying to do that.

It's a proxy for care and mobility costs, with a bit of dignity of disabled people chose how they buy that care /mobility.

I know someone who uses her PIP to have her hair washed at a hairdressers.
Been told on here that it is a "luxury" and her money (which goes into her general bank account along with her wages) should not go in it because working people can't afford to go the hairdressers.
She can't lift her arms above her head. She gets PIP for that, and uses it to get her hair washed once a week.

alexalisten · 29/06/2025 20:49

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 20:45

I know someone who uses her PIP to have her hair washed at a hairdressers.
Been told on here that it is a "luxury" and her money (which goes into her general bank account along with her wages) should not go in it because working people can't afford to go the hairdressers.
She can't lift her arms above her head. She gets PIP for that, and uses it to get her hair washed once a week.

I cant believe i never thought to do this i cant wash my own hair. I didn't even think of going to the hairdressers. Thankyou ❤️

Fearfulsaints · 29/06/2025 20:49

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 20:45

I know someone who uses her PIP to have her hair washed at a hairdressers.
Been told on here that it is a "luxury" and her money (which goes into her general bank account along with her wages) should not go in it because working people can't afford to go the hairdressers.
She can't lift her arms above her head. She gets PIP for that, and uses it to get her hair washed once a week.

Exactly.

Don't get sucked into luxury discussion as its a red herring.

It isn't the aim of PIP its just a guess of how much dusability costs (which is apparently a shortfall) and the best people to decide how to use PIP to help with care and mobility are the people with the condition.

My aunt has someone wash her hair. Not a luxury. Basic care.

Fsads · 29/06/2025 20:50

PandoraSocks · 29/06/2025 20:22

So you don't think that society should aspire to a decent standard of living for everyone? Good food, a decent home, a social life, the occasional holiday? All that is good for the economy as well as the individual.

No. Healthy food. A warm and heated home and basic utilities if you are too the point you cannot work.

I think if someone is physically healthy they aren't entitled to it and they should work for it.

I concede that if someone has mental or physical disabilities then yeah the government should give them some support.