Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Taxes to rise to fund PIP 2

350 replies

Viviennemary · 28/06/2025 21:06

I saw the other thread was full. Still I look forward to the vote which is on Tuesday. Sky news called him two Tier Keir. Most unfair thing ever if this passes.

OP posts:
XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 19:47

I also agree that mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety should not be under long term PIP. I say this as someone who has PTSD, and likely bouts of depression. I have found that working has assisted my mental health and supporting individuals through alternative channels might be more effective

Ah, this again. People applying for PIP have to list ALL of their health conditions. It is not unusual for someone with say, chronic pain, to also have depression. That does not mean they are claiming PIP for depression.

The people I do know that claim for depression (as in, they have no other conditions) are totally and utterly crippled by it.

MyNameIsX · 29/06/2025 19:51

Ministers face showdown on UK welfare reform as concessions fail to quash rebellion.

FT.

Game on.

Buzyizzy217 · 29/06/2025 19:51

No one is entitled to luxuries? Are you for real? Right, so because Joe was deprived of oxygen at birth, he should never have a holiday. Because that’s what you’re saying. Or the motorcyclist paralysed after an accident shouldn’t either? Jeez there are some truly evil peeps around.

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 19:54

Buzyizzy217 · 29/06/2025 19:51

No one is entitled to luxuries? Are you for real? Right, so because Joe was deprived of oxygen at birth, he should never have a holiday. Because that’s what you’re saying. Or the motorcyclist paralysed after an accident shouldn’t either? Jeez there are some truly evil peeps around.

Yes, sadly some people on here say that disabled people in receipt of benefits should not be able to spend it on luxuries. I was told that if I had any spare money after my bills etc, then I should have to pay the rest back to DWP.

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 19:55

Fsads · 29/06/2025 19:33

I'm open to have my mind changed but if someone is completely unable to work due to health issues then the sum of their welfare money they get should be enough to sustain them. Food, water, heating, utility bills etc.

No one is entitled to luxuries. There are working people who can't afford passports and can't afford to go abroad.

Imo someone who cannot work due to their health deserves enough to have some basic standard of life provided but the taxpayer cannot needlessly subsidise.

There was a pp which stated that the person concerned used their backpayment for PIP to be able to go on holiday. People would have no qualms with someone receiving child benefits, saving to go on holiday, so why do you think that disabled people unable to work, should be held to a different standard?

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 19:57

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 19:55

There was a pp which stated that the person concerned used their backpayment for PIP to be able to go on holiday. People would have no qualms with someone receiving child benefits, saving to go on holiday, so why do you think that disabled people unable to work, should be held to a different standard?

Well, there has been posts and comments on here that are saying that if someone can go on holiday, they can't possibly be disabled enough for support.

PandoraSocks · 29/06/2025 19:57

Fsads · 29/06/2025 19:33

I'm open to have my mind changed but if someone is completely unable to work due to health issues then the sum of their welfare money they get should be enough to sustain them. Food, water, heating, utility bills etc.

No one is entitled to luxuries. There are working people who can't afford passports and can't afford to go abroad.

Imo someone who cannot work due to their health deserves enough to have some basic standard of life provided but the taxpayer cannot needlessly subsidise.

I started to type a reply to this, but realised it is pointless. The ableism is off the scale.

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 20:01

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 19:55

There was a pp which stated that the person concerned used their backpayment for PIP to be able to go on holiday. People would have no qualms with someone receiving child benefits, saving to go on holiday, so why do you think that disabled people unable to work, should be held to a different standard?

Child benefit is £26.05 per child weekly. Would take quite a bit of saving to go on holiday.

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 20:02

XenoBitch · 29/06/2025 19:57

Well, there has been posts and comments on here that are saying that if someone can go on holiday, they can't possibly be disabled enough for support.

Hmm. It is astounding. Have these same people never heard of special assistance at the airport, or wheel chairs, and other aids, and help available to disabled people to help them travel. There is even such a thing as portable oxygen machines!!

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 20:04

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 20:01

Child benefit is £26.05 per child weekly. Would take quite a bit of saving to go on holiday.

So what. You don't know how long the disabled person, being begrudged a holiday, has taken to save that money.🙄

MyNameIsX · 29/06/2025 20:05

Whichever side of the debate you sit, it does look like PIP reform is coming.

Remember, that strategic genius Morgan McSweeney insisted on a Labour manifesto commitment that it wouldn’t increase income tax and the other large sources of government revenue. That commitment will be a five year mistake.

Hence, Labour have to muck about raising taxes that are small sources of revenue and cutting welfare spending.

Fertile ground to allow Reform and/or the Tories back in (for another 14 years+).

Enjoy.

Kendodd · 29/06/2025 20:05

EasternStandard · 29/06/2025 19:25

The social contract mentioned here is the thing to watch. Labour can't push everyone too far and expect all the funding to hold up.

The social contract is well and truly broken already.
It's broken for low paid working people who can not get on in life anymore. They work all hours in crappy jobs that will never afford them even a basic standard of living or a decent home. And they they get blamed for their own poverty (because they work in a care home looking after your mum) and that they should have worked harder and got a better job. If they dare spend £3.50 on a takeaway coffee once a week, well, such extravagance is the reason they're so poor. They should have nothing.
These are the people society has well and truly failed.

Buzyizzy217 · 29/06/2025 20:07

😶

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 20:08

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 20:04

So what. You don't know how long the disabled person, being begrudged a holiday, has taken to save that money.🙄

What do you mean so what? You were the one that referred to child benefit possibly being saved to go on holiday. I was pointing out the rather paltry rate.

Ohthatsabitshit · 29/06/2025 20:09

Helpmefindmysoul · 29/06/2025 19:27

@Ohthatsabitshit no why should the higher bracket households shoulder the burden for the great good of society? What do we get out of it?
We earn enough to support our family and we are not living some well off comfortable life that everyone on mumsnet seems to perceive.
We are not reckless and tired of hearing this rhetoric. We don’t qualify for child benefit but that’s okay because we planned the children we wanted and should be able to support them right? The children didn’t choose us as the parents so why do they not get their child benefit? The same children that will be expected to become tax payers in the next 20 years?
I have two autoimmune conditions but no we should be paying more tax for others.
Tax now, then tax the pensions then tax assets. This hatred for people who earn a little more is tiresome.

How about MPs live in their constituency and travel to Westminster as required without claiming second home expenses and solely living off their already tax payer funded salary. Just like the rest of the workforce in this country that has to decide if they can do the commute to work on the compensation they receive.

If expenses were taken away I’m sure a lot of money would be available to the public purse.

I also agree that mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety should not be under long term PIP. I say this as someone who has PTSD, and likely bouts of depression. I have found that working has assisted my mental health and supporting individuals through alternative channels might be more effective.

Further if we continue on this greater tax trajectory more tax payers will emigrate and then we will have even a high tax burden with more going out than can be covered. Yet these people will no doubt be back when they’re older and the countries they emigrate too are not willing to cover their long term chronic conditions.

Perhaps we should make it so tourists who come to London have to pay a greater tourist levy to enter attractions to generate tax or a higher NHS levy for those who work in the UK without citizenship. Students taking out health insurance when coming to study in the UK, families also having to pay a levy towards the schools, until they obtain their ILR.

These practises don’t seem to be a problem in any other county but god forbid it’s suggested in the UK there is an uproar.

But hard no on the increased taxes.

You seem to believe that you speak for all high incomes me households, you REALLY don’t. Most of my cohort at university and the vast majority of my friends and family fall into this bracket and very very few of them aren’t willing to pay more to provide what is necessary. All of us should value the social support, in health, and in education, and in benefits for those who are disabled or unable to work. Only a blinkered fool would want to live in a country that didn’t provide this kind of support.

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 20:09

Kendodd · 29/06/2025 20:05

The social contract is well and truly broken already.
It's broken for low paid working people who can not get on in life anymore. They work all hours in crappy jobs that will never afford them even a basic standard of living or a decent home. And they they get blamed for their own poverty (because they work in a care home looking after your mum) and that they should have worked harder and got a better job. If they dare spend £3.50 on a takeaway coffee once a week, well, such extravagance is the reason they're so poor. They should have nothing.
These are the people society has well and truly failed.

Don’t worry. It won’t always be this way I can assure you. Change is a coming.

MyNameIsX · 29/06/2025 20:10

Ohthatsabitshit · 29/06/2025 20:09

You seem to believe that you speak for all high incomes me households, you REALLY don’t. Most of my cohort at university and the vast majority of my friends and family fall into this bracket and very very few of them aren’t willing to pay more to provide what is necessary. All of us should value the social support, in health, and in education, and in benefits for those who are disabled or unable to work. Only a blinkered fool would want to live in a country that didn’t provide this kind of support.

I am fully with @Helpmefindmysoul

Everlore · 29/06/2025 20:11

I'd like to pose an ethical dilemma to the posters horrified by the idea that disabled people in receipt of PIP might sometimes go on holiday.
I go on holiday most years, though not last year due to being pregnant or this due to having a small baby. I work full-time and also receive PIP. The monthly costs incidental to my disability exceed my PIP payments but I can still afford to go on holiday because of my wages. Is it ethically wrong for me to go on holiday because I am in receipt of pip? i MEAN, THE pip PAYMENTS ARE PAID INTO THE SAME BANK ACCOUNT AS MY WAGES SO I can't specify which specific pounds come from my employer and which from the government so, is this immoral?
Also, TO ANSWER QUESTIONS POSED BY PREVIOUS POSTERS, yes, I'm still disabled while on holiday and, in case the poster who seemed confused about my ability to access the web is still reading, yes, I can still enjoy a holiday despite being blind, just in case you were pondering on why I'd bother leaving the house when I can't see what's around me!

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 20:11

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 20:08

What do you mean so what? You were the one that referred to child benefit possibly being saved to go on holiday. I was pointing out the rather paltry rate.

Is that all you were doing? If so, I beg your pardon.

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 20:15

Everlore · 29/06/2025 20:11

I'd like to pose an ethical dilemma to the posters horrified by the idea that disabled people in receipt of PIP might sometimes go on holiday.
I go on holiday most years, though not last year due to being pregnant or this due to having a small baby. I work full-time and also receive PIP. The monthly costs incidental to my disability exceed my PIP payments but I can still afford to go on holiday because of my wages. Is it ethically wrong for me to go on holiday because I am in receipt of pip? i MEAN, THE pip PAYMENTS ARE PAID INTO THE SAME BANK ACCOUNT AS MY WAGES SO I can't specify which specific pounds come from my employer and which from the government so, is this immoral?
Also, TO ANSWER QUESTIONS POSED BY PREVIOUS POSTERS, yes, I'm still disabled while on holiday and, in case the poster who seemed confused about my ability to access the web is still reading, yes, I can still enjoy a holiday despite being blind, just in case you were pondering on why I'd bother leaving the house when I can't see what's around me!

Careful, you will have people questioning you for being disabled, and having children next. The cheek of it.

Fsads · 29/06/2025 20:17

Buzyizzy217 · 29/06/2025 19:51

No one is entitled to luxuries? Are you for real? Right, so because Joe was deprived of oxygen at birth, he should never have a holiday. Because that’s what you’re saying. Or the motorcyclist paralysed after an accident shouldn’t either? Jeez there are some truly evil peeps around.

No one is entitled to luxuries. Not even me a working person.

Fearfulsaints · 29/06/2025 20:19

Julen7 · 29/06/2025 20:01

Child benefit is £26.05 per child weekly. Would take quite a bit of saving to go on holiday.

The lowest rate of pip is a similar amount per week.

I reckon a sixth months back payment could do one person an out of season somewhere for a short break.

Obviously a child isn't able to holiday alone and stuck with term time only.

justkeepswimingswiming · 29/06/2025 20:19

God beforbid a disabled person pays £10.99 for Netflix to take their mind off their pain. Its a luxury isn’t it?
End of the day the MPs claim expenses for alcohol, massive food allowances, second homes, private jets yet your angry at disabled people?

itsgettingweird · 29/06/2025 20:22

I don’t understand why they didn’t just reverse the stupid NI cuts the Tory’s did.

They only did it for votes - we couldn’t afford it then and we can’t now.

LadyKenya · 29/06/2025 20:22

justkeepswimingswiming · 29/06/2025 20:19

God beforbid a disabled person pays £10.99 for Netflix to take their mind off their pain. Its a luxury isn’t it?
End of the day the MPs claim expenses for alcohol, massive food allowances, second homes, private jets yet your angry at disabled people?

There always has to be a scapegoat, so that the masses don't look up to what the people hoarding all the wealth are doing. Disabled people are just the latest, in a long line of scapegoats being done over.

Swipe left for the next trending thread