Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Taxes to rise to fund PIP

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 11:20

I just read this, Don't agree with this at all. PIP needs to be reformed. But not by introducing this two tier system. Sick of Labour already. Might have know they would revert to type. With all the infighting and disagreement so nothing ever gets done except back peddling, increased taxes and prices rises.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 18:55

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 18:43

No you're guliable to belive someone who tells you they made up dyslexia and agoraphobia to get pip.

Who mentioned dyslexia? 🤣 And who said that he told me he made it up? Are you quite alright in the head 🤣

And the word is gullible, not guliable.

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 18:56

OonaStubbs · 27/06/2025 18:37

Anyone is entitled to a car, as long as they go out and get a job so they can pay for it. Why should other people have to work not only to afford their own car but someone else's too?

If you read the thread you’ll find that the tax payer has minimal input to motability beyond the mobility allowance that would be payable to everyone entitled to the higher rate - around 30% of those who claim PIP and representing the very most severely disabled. So no, by and large, you’re not funding anyone else’s car. You’re funding their mobility allowance, designed to keep them mobile in recognition of the fact that mobility is an important factor in disability. A charity funding a private concern - motabiity - does the rest and has been doing it for over forty years now. Only recently has there been the mean minded opposition we see in posts like yours. The fact that they can hand over that allowance and get a car in return is what irks you. Would you be prepared to take on the disability in order to have the same ? No ? Thought not.

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 18:57

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 18:55

Who mentioned dyslexia? 🤣 And who said that he told me he made it up? Are you quite alright in the head 🤣

And the word is gullible, not guliable.

Sorry I got you mixed up with @cumbriaisbest my bad

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Kirbert2 · 27/06/2025 18:58

OonaStubbs · 27/06/2025 18:49

What do people want? Benefits for life with no kind of assessment required? It's hundreds of thousands of pounds over a lifetime, of course there needs to be some kind of assessment and re-assessment over time, otherwise it is an open door for fraudsters to con the country (ie, working people) for every penny.

Some common sense would be a nice start.

Assessors who know what they are talking about
Consistency with assessments
Clearer and less complicated forms
Lifetime awards for those who are clearly never going to improve due to their condition to not waste time or cause any distress

etc

Kitte321 · 27/06/2025 19:00

x2boys · 27/06/2025 18:46

It doesn't vo.off the condition it goes off the how it impacts you
Many people have life long conditions and don't qualify for PIP.
So to get HRM your aunt must significantly impacted by her condition

Yes I understand that. And I don’t doubt that my aunts condition impacts her life. In a perfect world I would have no problem with this additional financial assistance.
However, this is far from a perfect world. We are underfunding education, the NHS, mental health services and so much more. I therefore think that providing this additional help to a wealthy person who could help themselves may need to be reviewed.

Cornishpotato · 27/06/2025 19:00

PandoraSocks · 27/06/2025 18:40

Do you think it is wrong for people to use accountants to minimise their tax bill?

I can't see the problem with this. It is no different to people getting help from CAB or their social worker etc. to fill in the form.

Edited

It is very different to using a professional.

AI is a tool that will give you the answers you ask for. I posted up thread about my ex partner who is tech savvy enough to use it to get PIP for non existent functioning problems.

This is quite possibly already behind the recent upsurge but there's strenuous objections to the government using AI to analyse claims.

This is end stage socialism. The nations handbag is now a global money tree.

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 19:00

DrowningInSyrup · 27/06/2025 18:31

It is your ignorance, pip claimants with mental health issues aren't entitled to a car. Private psychiatrists cost an awful lot more than the lower rate pip pays. People with mental health issues have many of the same problems as people with physical disabilities, cooking, shopping, keeping themselves safe, leaving the house, personal care. Stop PIP for mental health conditions, what are these people supposed to do?

No. Actually it’s your ignorance. PIP claimants can qualify for higher rate mobility allowance on MH grounds alone if the conditions are severe enough. And when they do, they can join motability. I understand that you’re posting in support of those with MH issues, but on this issue you’re wrong.

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:02

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 18:57

Sorry I got you mixed up with @cumbriaisbest my bad

Yeah.....

Kirbert2 · 27/06/2025 19:04

Cornishpotato · 27/06/2025 19:00

It is very different to using a professional.

AI is a tool that will give you the answers you ask for. I posted up thread about my ex partner who is tech savvy enough to use it to get PIP for non existent functioning problems.

This is quite possibly already behind the recent upsurge but there's strenuous objections to the government using AI to analyse claims.

This is end stage socialism. The nations handbag is now a global money tree.

I was advised by social workers how to word things on my son's DLA form. I'm really not seeing the difference, especially as you need evidence to back up what is said on the forms.

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:07

Kirbert2 · 27/06/2025 18:58

Some common sense would be a nice start.

Assessors who know what they are talking about
Consistency with assessments
Clearer and less complicated forms
Lifetime awards for those who are clearly never going to improve due to their condition to not waste time or cause any distress

etc

I don't think the problem is with the assessors. They often complete assessments in good faith and recommend that the claimant gets an award. It then gets passed to people who screen these forms who are basically 'customer service managers' in a call centre type of place who have no medical training who can choose to either accept the assessment, or return it to the healthcare professional and advise them (make them) change their findings and recommendations. I know both HCP's who do these assessments and a customer service person who works on the control side of the assessments.

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 19:07

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:02

Yeah.....

I said sorry 😢

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 19:08

x2boys · 27/06/2025 18:46

It doesn't vo.off the condition it goes off the how it impacts you
Many people have life long conditions and don't qualify for PIP.
So to get HRM your aunt must significantly impacted by her condition

And if the aunt was ‘perfectly capable’ I doubt she would qualify for the higher rate mobility allowance that gets her the car. Why is it that motability cars stir up so much ill feeling in posters. IRL i’ve never experienced this.

Cornishpotato · 27/06/2025 19:08

Kirbert2 · 27/06/2025 19:04

I was advised by social workers how to word things on my son's DLA form. I'm really not seeing the difference, especially as you need evidence to back up what is said on the forms.

In the end it doesn't really matter if you individually don't see the difference because it's already happening and will grow and the public sector will be outpaced by it.

PandoraSocks · 27/06/2025 19:09

Cornishpotato · 27/06/2025 19:00

It is very different to using a professional.

AI is a tool that will give you the answers you ask for. I posted up thread about my ex partner who is tech savvy enough to use it to get PIP for non existent functioning problems.

This is quite possibly already behind the recent upsurge but there's strenuous objections to the government using AI to analyse claims.

This is end stage socialism. The nations handbag is now a global money tree.

End stage socialism? Which country are you talking about?

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:10

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 19:07

I said sorry 😢

Cool

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 19:10

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:02

Yeah.....

See

Taxes to rise to fund PIP
alexalisten · 27/06/2025 19:11

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:10

Cool

Stop it stop it stop it 😭😭😭

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:11

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 19:10

See

👍

Nana4 · 27/06/2025 19:12

Badbadbunny · 27/06/2025 12:18

It won't be "everyone" though, will it? Those living on benefits will be exempt, as will pensioners. So it WILL just be yet another tax on workers.

Do you think pensioners don’t pay tax? Any pensioner who has any income over their state pension will be paying income tax, as well as VAT and council tax.

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 19:12

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:11

👍

Oh no you've found my one weakness 🥹

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:13

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 19:12

Oh no you've found my one weakness 🥹

😘👋

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 19:13

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:13

😘👋

Thankyou ❤️

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 19:13

OldMcDonaldHadABigMac · 27/06/2025 19:07

I don't think the problem is with the assessors. They often complete assessments in good faith and recommend that the claimant gets an award. It then gets passed to people who screen these forms who are basically 'customer service managers' in a call centre type of place who have no medical training who can choose to either accept the assessment, or return it to the healthcare professional and advise them (make them) change their findings and recommendations. I know both HCP's who do these assessments and a customer service person who works on the control side of the assessments.

Not true. The assessors reports go to case managers at DWP and they make the decision on award based on the points scored by the assessor. The case manager mostly relies on the assessors’ report precisely because they have no medical training themselves - they’re not in a position to ‘choose’ whether to accept them or not. When they return reports it’s not because they don’t accept them, it’s because they don’t understand something or need further clarification of certain elements before they award. You’re confusing this with something laughably called ‘quality control’ where independent auditors can take a sample of assessors reports and force assessors to change the points awarded. The auditors don’t have sight of the claimant and don’t know anything about them. It’s random.

bythefireplace · 27/06/2025 19:15

PIP isn’t easy to get. I have health conditions/disabilities that mean I can’t work more than I do (currently 40hrs a week) and I have to sleep after work in order to be able to do that because the fatigue is so rough and weekends I spent recovering from my weekly meds (I do them at the weekend not to affect work)
Still not entitled to PIP. Still trying to cling onto a job as I can’t pay my mortgage otherwise but my sickness is an issue

Tealtroubles · 27/06/2025 19:15

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 17:55

I clarified upthread. This happens quite often with benefits. When PIP was introduced there was a cut off point for migrating those on DLA. Those left on DLA as a legacy benefit because of that cut off weren’t subject to the same harsh eligibility conditions as PIP, and as a result had higher levels of benefit awards than those awarded on PIP migration for similar conditions. Once these legacy benefit claims are closed everyone will be on PIP and adult DLA will no longer exist. Same here. Once the exiting claims are closed, everyone will be subject to the same eligibility rules. It’s a transition period aimed at mitigating the effects for those already claiming and reliant on that level of income, although it does seem unfair at face value.

However, the devil, as always, is in the detail. And it’s not clear whether existing claimants will be subject to the new rules if there is a change of circumstance or on reassessment of their claim. All we know at the moment is that existing claimants won’t be affected. I think we need to wait and see how ‘existing claimant’ is defined.

I think it’s purposefully done.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.