Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Taxes to rise to fund PIP

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 11:20

I just read this, Don't agree with this at all. PIP needs to be reformed. But not by introducing this two tier system. Sick of Labour already. Might have know they would revert to type. With all the infighting and disagreement so nothing ever gets done except back peddling, increased taxes and prices rises.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Poynsettia · 27/06/2025 17:31

I think everything should be taxed -so
Someone said this on the news today. So give pensioners their wfa but treat it as income so the wealthy pay tax on it. Ditto benefits. So if eg you have a high income but also a disability, port of your benefit payment goes in tax

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 17:31

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:28

@alexalisten but not everyone is the same.

No exactly funny that how everyone has different needs and abilities luckily we have something in place to help those people

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 17:31

DrowningInSyrup · 27/06/2025 17:23

They won't, many will get their PIP stopped who simply cannot work. That £300 per month could make all the difference, especially when their limited capacity for work payments also get stopped. Get ready for a spike in homelessness and suicide.

There was a thread here a few days ago about a disabled boy who broke away from his carer and grabbed at a young cashier in a shop. The carer was likely a parent or friend who was probably at the end of their tether because the care system is broken in this country.

When the PIP cuts come into effect there are going to be significantly less people eligible for support and significantly less unpaid family carers eligible for carers allowance. Where does government think these people will go for the support they would otherwise have got from PIP and CA. It’ll fall to the already overstretched care system to accommodate them at significantly more cost than PIP and CA facilitated. The standard of care will deteriorate, there will be more incidents like the one mentioned here, and ultimately the tax payer will pay the price. The cut wont save a penny - it will significantly increase the cost and shift it from one budget to another. Robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

creekyjohn · 27/06/2025 17:32

threesocksmorgan · 27/06/2025 17:22

Just got to say that you can also extend the lease up to 7 years.

Only for very low mileage or heavily adapted vehicles. They used to let you extend your lease through choice but now you have to fit their very tight conditions.

Just to add to the pp you are quoting, you no longer have the option to buy at the end of the lease.

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:34

@alexalisten but you were the one who claimed disabled people can't have fun!

tempacct · 27/06/2025 17:35

MidnightPatrol · 27/06/2025 12:24

Because once you start paying 40-50%+ rates on parts of your income, it acts as a serious incentive to not bother.

Particualrly when the tax doesn’t appear to be being productively spent. Nor the government actually trying to keep what are rapidly growing costs under control.

It’s not ‘fuck you, I’m fine’, it’s ’this is no longer fair, so I’m not willing to participate in it’.

Exactly. I was working in an extremely competitive field - we worked overnights, had dinner in the office, it was totally all consuming. I worked hard to get the job, I worked hard in the job, and it was exhausting.

Why bother with all the stress and overwork if you're actively punished for it, and not only that but derided by people who consider you 'privileged' and 'greedy'? If we punish people for being higher earners, the higher earners will stop bothering or go elsewhere.

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 17:35

x2boys · 27/06/2025 17:21

Even if it was it's the sons money not hers.

Yeah, I don’t think that poster applied much critical thinking there.

babyproblems · 27/06/2025 17:36

CagneyNYPD1 · 27/06/2025 11:41

I pay tax. My dsis receives a range of benefits due to her disabilities. She has never worked and never will. My other dsis receives UC and carer’s allowance as she only works part time so that she can also care for our mum. Thus keeping Mum out of a care home that would be founded by the local council.

I am happy to pay more income tax if it means that my sisters do not have the stress of having their benefits cut.

But employers must do much, much more to enable those with disabilities and health needs to work.

We also have a huge storm coming down the line of young people with mental health needs who will claim that they are unable to work. We should be pumping massive amounts of money into supporting young people with their mental health so that they don’t end up not being able to work.

Edited

Agree with @CagneyNYPD1 🙏
I think people don’t pay enough tax for the type of society they want to live in tbh. Business also needs to pay much much more tax globally. Good article on the guardian this week as we are about to have the worlds first trillionaires.. yet half the world population is living in dire poverty. Inequality has reached record levels. More much more needs to go back in.

x2boys · 27/06/2025 17:37

Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:30

Child benefit is for children but the government had no issue means testing that.

Actually it's for parents to help.care for their children, DLA ,and PIP is paid in the child's name

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 17:37

creekyjohn · 27/06/2025 17:32

Only for very low mileage or heavily adapted vehicles. They used to let you extend your lease through choice but now you have to fit their very tight conditions.

Just to add to the pp you are quoting, you no longer have the option to buy at the end of the lease.

Yeah my bad - that stopped in 2023. Sorry.

Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:37

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 17:35

Yeah, I don’t think that poster applied much critical thinking there.

The poster did and replied to the original thread. They said that the government had no issues means testing child benefit which is for children.

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 17:39

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:34

@alexalisten but you were the one who claimed disabled people can't have fun!

I never said that I described my life

Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:40

If a parent has a million quid in the bank and a million quid house, there is justification that their children don't need DLA especially when government is looking to make cuts. Poorer folk would not be affected.

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 17:40

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:19

All I will say here is that becoming disabled or getting a life long serious health condition can happen to anyone at any time. It did to me out of the blue. Where will the support be for you then?

It might not be there as they are changing the rules for new claimants...

No one begrudges a legitimate case & I know people who should get more help imo but I do know people on high incomes who gets DLA for ADHD etc and imo that's questionable.

DLA is now mostly only paid for children, so in that case the high income would not be relevant as the benefit is in the childs name, not the parents.

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 17:42

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 17:26

The lowest rate pip is £29.50 a week i have no idea how much pension credits are.

I'd love to know how. Benefits for pensioners are very low.

OP posts:
Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:43

Well I don't know what the answers are genuinely but we clearly can't go on like this. I don't want my kids paying ever more tax when they will never afford a house of their own. Something has to change. No idea what though. It seems neither do any of the political parties

Tealtroubles · 27/06/2025 17:43

Can someone please clarify what’s happening succinctly?

Are they really creating another tier? Honestly this is what’s wrong with this country. So many people receiving so many different types of support at different levels and so many people being taxed at different levels (yes I am including student loan in that). It’s like divide and conquer. This is not equality.

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 17:46

Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:40

If a parent has a million quid in the bank and a million quid house, there is justification that their children don't need DLA especially when government is looking to make cuts. Poorer folk would not be affected.

Depends on where you set the threshold. If you have a child with very high needs it wouldn’t take long to reduce your assets to detrimental levels if you had to pay for everything yourself. When you have a disabled child - or indeed are disabled yourself, you need to future proof yourself. Means testing works against that. I find it really interesting that in a society where parents have child benefit, nursery fees and other benefits paid at quite high levels of income, the same privilege is begrudged to disabled people.

AngelicKaty · 27/06/2025 17:46

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 16:40

Sigh. That was my point. People are not taxed on other benefits like pip, housing
benefits and so on.

And my point is, if they only receive the SP, they don't pay tax on it anyway. Sigh. 🙄

Mrsbloggz · 27/06/2025 17:47

Instead of giving people ever more benefits I think the gvt should address the unaffordability of basic needs like housing & heating.

Morphingirl · 27/06/2025 17:47

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 13:37

Only 17% of PIP claimants are in work. You are the one who needs to check facts rather than trotting out the same tired old stuff.

But the point remains that people do work with pip - I'm one of those people. I also agree that pip needs to change but without pip I wouldn't be able to work .

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:47

Means testing works against that. I find it really interesting that in a society where parents have child benefit, nursery fees and other benefits paid at quite high levels of income, the same privilege is begrudged to disabled people.

Child benefit and free hours are means tested at 80k. Are you saying that should be the threshold for DLA etc?

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:48

free hours is to 100k

Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:49

Mrsbloggz · 27/06/2025 17:47

Instead of giving people ever more benefits I think the gvt should address the unaffordability of basic needs like housing & heating.

Agree completely. Also insist employers pay a proper wage so it doesn't need topping up by UC. It does seem insane that housing benefit goes to rich landlords. The whole system is fucked quite frankly.

NorthXNorthWest · 27/06/2025 17:49

Pipsquiggle · 27/06/2025 14:51

@NorthXNorthWest

It's a bloody good starter for 10 though isn't it.

A lot of European countries have amazing healthcare systems with different funding models - why don't we have a look at them?

One metric taken out of context is not a good starter for 10 for anyone who genuinely wants wants a positive and sustainable change.
GDP?
Less people claiming benefits.

Stricter criteria for benefits.
Sovereign wealth
Population age profile
And so on

Context matters

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.