Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Taxes to rise to fund PIP

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 11:20

I just read this, Don't agree with this at all. PIP needs to be reformed. But not by introducing this two tier system. Sick of Labour already. Might have know they would revert to type. With all the infighting and disagreement so nothing ever gets done except back peddling, increased taxes and prices rises.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
EasternStandard · 27/06/2025 17:18

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 17:14

Being disabled the same, you also cant do anything fun ever as your to ill to.

This seems at odds with this response from pp

So you don’t think disabled people should go on holiday ? If she has found a way to manage that agoraphobia what business is it of yours ? And PIP would not be awarded on the basis of Agoraphobia alone - it would be considered as part of wider MH problem, which you may or may not be aware of, depending on whether you live with her 24/7, have access and understanding of her medical records, and are privy to all the details of her benefit claim.

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:19

All I will say here is that becoming disabled or getting a life long serious health condition can happen to anyone at any time. It did to me out of the blue. Where will the support be for you then?

It might not be there as they are changing the rules for new claimants...

No one begrudges a legitimate case & I know people who should get more help imo but I do know people on high incomes who gets DLA for ADHD etc and imo that's questionable.

Vinvertebrate · 27/06/2025 17:19

We have a decent annual household income (£350k ish) and until recently I was ambivalent about paying up to 60% tax on part of my income. I grew up in a council house and was raised by a single parent so having money will always feel like a novelty, I suspect.

However, the year in which we paid 6 figures to HMRC (not all IT some CGT as well) coincided with my disabled DS having no school place, no reliable access to a pediatrician - no private pediatrics here either - and being told that the wait for NHS ADHD diagnosis would be “at least” 3 years.

It might come from a position of privilege, but paying Waitrose levels of tax for Poundland services does not incentivize anyone to earn more.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:19

Being disabled the same, you also cant do anything fun ever as your to ill to.

My relative is disabled and gets AA. Of course she does fun things!

Kirbert2 · 27/06/2025 17:20

C8H10N4O2 · 27/06/2025 17:00

Do you have one of the basic models? I know at the bottom end this is true but I have colleagues who do a lot of driving hours and need something a bit higher end who have paid hefty deposits.

The insurance has fluctuated I think over the years. I remember one friend deciding against a motability car because she simply couldn’t get insurance as a disabled driver with an adapted car but that was some years ago and I know the system has changed a few times. I know others who do have it covered as part of the current package so that may be just me out of date.

We need a WAV for our son and we paid a £4.6k deposit. That was one of the cheapest deposits for a WAV.

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 17:20

You lot do realise its only about 30% of people who get high rate pip and some people on pip will be getting less then £100 a month you all seem to think where rolling in it.

EasternStandard · 27/06/2025 17:21

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 17:16

Fewer and fewer workers and more benefit claiments = financial disaster. It isn't rocket science. Well done Labour. Usual mess. Should have known better than to vote for them.

Well you did muck up there

x2boys · 27/06/2025 17:21

Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:16

I think they should all be means tested too. A friend of mine lives in a 700k house. Mortgage paid off. She inherited a substantial sum of money. She gets higher rate pip for her son who has Adhd. It should d be means tested and assets and money in the bank should be included in addition to income.

Even if it was it's the sons money not hers.

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 17:22

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:19

Being disabled the same, you also cant do anything fun ever as your to ill to.

My relative is disabled and gets AA. Of course she does fun things!

Im on pip and I dont. I work, sleep and go to appointments thats my life i haven't been on holiday or for a nice day out in over 10 years all my annual leave is used on appointments the rest is unpaid

threesocksmorgan · 27/06/2025 17:22

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 16:55

You’re missing the point. The fact that motability purchases account for 20% of the market, is because the disabled person never owns the car. Vehicles are leased for three or five years, depending on the extent of adaptations required to drive or access the vehicle. So long term customers are being provided with new cars every three years as well as new recipients joining the scheme. Vehicles are sold on to various sources, including fleet vehicles. Motability customers who wish to purchase their vehicles at the end of the lease are also given the opportunity to do so.

Just got to say that you can also extend the lease up to 7 years.

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 17:23

Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:17

I didn't!

At least you didn't contribute to this disaster. I did.

OP posts:
DrowningInSyrup · 27/06/2025 17:23

EasternStandard · 27/06/2025 14:33

So how do those people cope?

They won't, many will get their PIP stopped who simply cannot work. That £300 per month could make all the difference, especially when their limited capacity for work payments also get stopped. Get ready for a spike in homelessness and suicide.

x2boys · 27/06/2025 17:23

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:19

Being disabled the same, you also cant do anything fun ever as your to ill to.

My relative is disabled and gets AA. Of course she does fun things!

Some will some won't it very much depends on the disability anchor it impacts a person

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 17:23

Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:16

I think they should all be means tested too. A friend of mine lives in a 700k house. Mortgage paid off. She inherited a substantial sum of money. She gets higher rate pip for her son who has Adhd. It should d be means tested and assets and money in the bank should be included in addition to income.

The problem with this is that means testing is a race to the bottom. Wherever you set the threshold someone will lose out. These benefits are universal for a reason. The cost of disability is universal no matter what your income. And if means testing were introduced for every person like your friend who was rendered ineligible because of significant wealth there would be people who would lose out for the sake of a few pounds. There would also be people who have needs massively higher than your friend who would be forced to go through savings at a rate of knots and render themselves significantly poorer and ill equipped for the future before they would get the help they need.

nomas · 27/06/2025 17:24

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 17:20

You lot do realise its only about 30% of people who get high rate pip and some people on pip will be getting less then £100 a month you all seem to think where rolling in it.

My mum gets lower rate PIP (and pension credit) but is still able to save thousands every year.

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:24

@x2boys i f course but that isn't what I replied to...

Vivienne1000 · 27/06/2025 17:24

if you go out to work until you are 67 you pay NI contributions. Fair enough. So why if you retire in your fifties on a defined benefit pension do you not pay NI until you are 67. That’s rewarding the rich idle. Everyone should pay NI until they are of pension age.

Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:25

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 17:23

At least you didn't contribute to this disaster. I did.

I considered it and then remembered Blair. Tories no way ever again. I went for my local independent. Obviously a wasted vote but the others didn't deserve it.

EasternStandard · 27/06/2025 17:25

DrowningInSyrup · 27/06/2025 17:23

They won't, many will get their PIP stopped who simply cannot work. That £300 per month could make all the difference, especially when their limited capacity for work payments also get stopped. Get ready for a spike in homelessness and suicide.

@Rosscameasdoodydon’t you think this will happen? Why do you support the change?

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 17:26

nomas · 27/06/2025 17:24

My mum gets lower rate PIP (and pension credit) but is still able to save thousands every year.

The lowest rate pip is £29.50 a week i have no idea how much pension credits are.

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:28

@alexalisten but not everyone is the same.

dynamiccactus · 27/06/2025 17:29

TheAutumnCrow · 27/06/2025 11:37

I doubt very much whether the propaganda around this ‘factoid’ is true.

Me neither. I suspect a lot of those with anxiety are anxious because they don't have jobs, not the other way round.

SwearyYellowStartish · 27/06/2025 17:29

PocketSand · 27/06/2025 15:44

@SwearyYellowStartish the administrative cost for one person may be small but the combined cost of reviewing for all claimants to check their limbs have not grown back, miraculously gained sight or become fully functioning is somewhat larger, irrelevant and adds to delay. Not to mention unnecessarily stressful for the claimant and their carer forced to complete the review forms. This is one of the proposed changes that acutually makes sense.

I wonder whether my autistic son who has been housebound for a decade and unlikely to ever work due to inability to communicate with anyone but family will also be exempt or whether he will be relentlessly reviewed in case a miracle has taken place.

I think this fundamentally misunderstands. Lots of peoples conditions remain with them for life but their ability to cope and function can improve or go downhill.

The limbs going back example is an interesting one. I am aware of a case where a double amputee (lost both legs in the 1990s) was receiving enhanced mobility and a ten year award. Previous opinion was that prosthetics would not be suitable. Medicine moved on, he was part of a trial for a new type of prosthetic and it was a success. He learned to walk again. That was picked up at the ten year award review.

I am also aware that we have picked up the fact that people have died at these reviews.

Bamboozled72 · 27/06/2025 17:30

x2boys · 27/06/2025 17:21

Even if it was it's the sons money not hers.

Child benefit is for children but the government had no issue means testing that.

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 17:31

@Vinvertebrate I would make child benefit universal for people like you, it used to be. You need to feel you are getting something out of system you are saying so much into.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.