Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

BREAKING NEWS- India has launched strikes on Pakistan

425 replies

BucketFacer · 06/05/2025 21:43

More war 😪

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
TheWombatleague · 07/05/2025 20:33

miraxxx · 07/05/2025 20:19

If we're simply ranking atrocities by counting the dead, then Capitalist Imperialism tops the list hands down

This itself tells me that we are dealing with a very unserious person and that nothing will come out of debating with fools.

Edited

Berk

StupidBoy · 07/05/2025 20:38

wizzywig · 07/05/2025 19:12

They really haven't stopped. anti german shite comes out all the time especially in relation to football games.

That's just football. It's about winding up the opposition. It's different. Still bloody stupid, but different.

GarlicPile · 07/05/2025 20:40

TheWombatleague · 07/05/2025 20:30

That's not the original point, but how is recognising class oppression under capitalism any more toxic than recognising, for example, women's oppression under capitalism?

No, it's not the original point, but presumably you believe there's no class oppression or sexism under socialism? Nor racism, disableism, etc?

No need to answer, I'm not engaging in a derailment here. Just suggesting a wider perspective for your consideration.

TheWombatleague · 07/05/2025 20:46

GarlicPile · 07/05/2025 20:40

No, it's not the original point, but presumably you believe there's no class oppression or sexism under socialism? Nor racism, disableism, etc?

No need to answer, I'm not engaging in a derailment here. Just suggesting a wider perspective for your consideration.

Well, there wouldn't be a class structure, so the mechanisms that enable/effect inequality would be different.

ToBeOrNotToBee · 07/05/2025 20:51

TheWombatleague · 07/05/2025 20:46

Well, there wouldn't be a class structure, so the mechanisms that enable/effect inequality would be different.

Every society has class structure in some description

CleaningSilverCandlesticks · 07/05/2025 20:57

ToBeOrNotToBee · 07/05/2025 20:51

Every society has class structure in some description

And India has a very strong one in the caste system. And religion feature highly in social status in both countries

Sroia · 07/05/2025 20:59

CleaningSilverCandlesticks · 07/05/2025 20:57

And India has a very strong one in the caste system. And religion feature highly in social status in both countries

Indian Sikhs, Muslims and Christians don’t subscribe to the caste system. Ie millions of Indians. The caste system is of less relevance in urban areas.

Very one dimensional and simplistic view

JaneFondue · 07/05/2025 21:04

I don't know what relevance the caste system has to the subject of this thread🙄 Complete derailment.

miraxxx · 07/05/2025 21:41

Indian Sikhs, Muslims and Christians don’t subscribe to the caste system

Untrue. Caste is an indian disease and indian muslims, christians and sikhs actually do observe caste although they are not supposed to. Caste is far more complex than most assume and India has been running the world's largest affirmative action programme since independence to ameliorate the pernicious effects of caste discrimination.

miraxxx · 07/05/2025 21:43

JaneFondue · 07/05/2025 21:04

I don't know what relevance the caste system has to the subject of this thread🙄 Complete derailment.

Yeah it is a derailment, sorry.

miraxxx · 07/05/2025 21:52

Well, there wouldn't be a class structure, so the mechanisms that enable/effect inequality would be different.

The naivete of some posters is hilarious. They sound like they believe that the working class were really the ruling class in communist paradises.

Sdcgfgs · 07/05/2025 21:57

The caste system was set up by the British

JaneFondue · 07/05/2025 22:04

The caste system.was not set up by the British, but we dont have to combat Islamic terrorism by discussing everything BUT Islamic terrorism.

FlyMeSomewhere · 07/05/2025 22:04

BBC breakfast were annoying me this morning with the excessive use of the phrase "nuclear nations*, it's not fair to terrify people like that and I have a mum who is a bit vulnerable and she really gets hung up on things about nuclear wars!
Nobody would win anything by dropping a nuke and I'm sure they know that! It wouldn't be like nuking a country thousands of miles away, dropping a nuke that close would effectively be like nuking themselves.

My DP and I are due to head to Sri Lanka next Jan and I'm starting to wonder if there'll be any safe airspace left open to get there as it's getting tricky heading east with so many places being in conflict!

Sdcgfgs · 07/05/2025 22:17

Research shows that hard boundaries were set by British colonial rulers. The scriptures are just about division of labour.

1dayatatime · 07/05/2025 22:54

Sdcgfgs · 07/05/2025 21:57

The caste system was set up by the British

Well we seem to have hit a new low of batshittery, simply wrong, self hate of the West conspiracy theories.

It's actually so factually deluded that it is not even worth critiquing.

Lentilweaver · 07/05/2025 23:15

I am on another thread where a poster is arguing that India and Pakistan are the same as each other. This after Pakistan has consistently been shown to harbour terrorists. The pp who made the point about the way the left now condones- nay welcomes!- Islamic terrorism is spot on. It's coming to the UK now.

EasternStandard · 08/05/2025 07:25

1dayatatime · 07/05/2025 22:54

Well we seem to have hit a new low of batshittery, simply wrong, self hate of the West conspiracy theories.

It's actually so factually deluded that it is not even worth critiquing.

Agree and with @Lentilweaver

FlyMeSomewhere · 08/05/2025 08:33

miraxxx · 07/05/2025 18:31

Yes, unless they can get a boot into a group they hate, genocide doesnt actually interest people. That is why a currently purported 'genocide' gets huge crowds of stupid and cruel people screaming for the extermination of the only jewish nation in the world, itself a refuge from a fairly recent industrial scale genocide and repeated terror attacks. But the 1971 genocide was pretty real and people were really targetted for their inferior race and religion. The repercussions for the UK is that it harbours quite a few war criminals because it is all "just brownies kicking off" to the powers that be. The hands-off approach has seen home grown terror and risk to the lives of those who speak up. Salman Rushdie? The Batley teacher? A British pakistani woman you-tuber who tearfully posted her good bye video a few hours ago today.

https://www.youtube.com/live/8piwfzbM5WA?si=wGtcAcycP3XoQlfj

Edited

Why are you making these statements! You don't speak for every British person or have right toske claims about what we all think or feel.

It's not a case of British people don't care about genocide, have you spoke to every citizen in the UK and asked?
Personally I've been genocide museums in places like Cape Town, Sarajevo, Auschwitz & Birkenhau - what genocide museums have you been to?
Personally I think British people are getting wary of getting involved in anything because as it is there too many people including some Brits even on this thread that think we should permanently beg forgiveness or constantly be dragged into war because of things that happened hundreds of years before we were born! We get sick of being told that we should feel guilty just for being born in this country! Well guess what, I'm from the same city as William Wilberforce!

People are rightfully wary of getting involved and being opinionated of things going on between other countries because we end up with reprisals! I don't ever want to see something like the Manchester Arena bombing happen again!

JaneFondue · 08/05/2025 08:47

Avoid the distractions and derailments.
It"s pretty simple: Islamic terrorism is a menace. And the Manchester arena bombing will certainly happen again if we bothsides India and Pakistan.

Hindutva is also a menace but a far lesser one, especially for the UK. MI5 is not devoting 75% of its resources to Hindutva terrorism.

We should be able to speak against Islamic terrorism without being accused of being bigots. Because Muslims and Islamic terrorists are not the same. Juat like Sikhs and Khalistani terrorists are not the same.

Popeyewhereareyou · 08/05/2025 09:08

mumof5andfat · 07/05/2025 11:37

What? I'm seriously lost? I was asking the poster why she thought that 'palestining' an entire population is the answer to the apparent raping of young white girls. I honestly do not see the logic here. In fact I'm genuinely interested in her line of thinking on this one.

What do you mean apparent!!!! How much proof do you need, thank God some of the rapists have been caught and jailed.

mumof5andfat · 08/05/2025 09:16

Popeyewhereareyou · 08/05/2025 09:08

What do you mean apparent!!!! How much proof do you need, thank God some of the rapists have been caught and jailed.

Please stop blaming an entire population for the evils of a few individuals. Unfortunately rape happens on a daily basis around the globe. As far as I’m concerted rapists should be castrated, but it’s never ok to kill innocent people which include children and women, over the actions of a few. They do not represent an entire country. I use the word ‘apparent’ because the poster was implying that the whole of Pakistan was involved in the raping of young white girls and thus the whole country should be ‘Palestined’.

Rummly · 08/05/2025 09:29

I see Pakistan is moving (some) heavy armour into the region.

I’ve also been learning that the Pakistani Chief of Staff is an Islamic fanatic. Senior military figures are the real power in that country. It’s never really been a civil society.

My guess is that the posturing by Pakistan will go no further: they’re completely outgunned and they know it. But I think we can expect more mischief towards India, and probably other countries too.

Popeyewhereareyou · 08/05/2025 09:44

mumof5andfat · 08/05/2025 09:16

Please stop blaming an entire population for the evils of a few individuals. Unfortunately rape happens on a daily basis around the globe. As far as I’m concerted rapists should be castrated, but it’s never ok to kill innocent people which include children and women, over the actions of a few. They do not represent an entire country. I use the word ‘apparent’ because the poster was implying that the whole of Pakistan was involved in the raping of young white girls and thus the whole country should be ‘Palestined’.

Thanks for making that clear. Not all the rapists were Pakistani some whites were involved, agree castrate them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread