For the parents who still believe in the system, I always want to ask...
- Would you send your child to China? Or Saudi? Or Russia? And when their knowledge of your chosen country is limited as well as their ability to speak the host language?
Yet 1/3 of current boarders in the UK are foreign nationals.
There to keep the schools in business. Strikes me as immoral, frankly.
- The Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse stated that boarders are amongst the highest risk of being molested - either peer on peer or by so-called "masters".
"even where safeguarding procedures and reporting protocols are extensive, the circumstances in which abusive relationships can develop and the cultural, organisational and geographic blind spots which can facilitate abuse in any boarding school are little different from the past.[18]"
So, I'm afraid they haven't changed much from the bad old days of the 1980s when it was prolific.
-
One "Houseparent" looks after circa 65 children. That works out at around 22 mins per day per child, excluding the fact that said child sleeps/attends school for much of it. It's children bringing up children. Always has been. Children in care homes have a much better ratio of adults:children than boarders.
-
Many children stop going home because it's too painful to face the loss over and over again. It's easier to go to other people's houses. "But they so love playing with their friends...they never want to come home" phenomena.
You can add central heating, carpets and curtains, but sending children away is just that: Abandoning them and hoping for the best. How can anyone be sure whether they child will "hack it". And what proportion of "but I loved it" makes boarding school acceptable? 10% 20% 50%?
So my final question for proponents of the system is this:
Why don't you parent? What's wrong with you?