Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

School run comments in work

429 replies

gocompare · 02/02/2025 08:42

In a meeting last month I said I wasn't available for Monday meetings at 3:00. I could do any other time before or after.

The most senior person in the meeting said "that sounds like a school run" I didn't really confirm or deny what it was.

It was said in a meeting full of men I was the only female if it makes a difference and I just feel off about it and I can't work out why but I don't think he should of said it.

Am I just being over sensitive as I have form for this.

OP posts:
BunnyLake · 02/02/2025 10:06

He wouldn’t have said it if it were a man (and he was indeed doing the school run). I get why it didn’t sit right with you.

gocompare · 02/02/2025 10:06

Dreammouse · 02/02/2025 10:03

Well he was correct wasn't he, if someone else had also mentioned i can't do 3 either there's nothing to indicate he wouldn't have commented on that also.

My flexi agreements are not really anyone else's business on that call. There were a few people on it.

I mean unless they're stupid they'll know if you're never available at 3 on certain days why let's be real. If your boss is fine with it (bizarre to agree to someone having lunch that late and then agree to them looking after their child for a portion of the day but up to them) then why worry? Even if it's mentioned there won't be an issue if they're aware and it's all agreed- id only worry if it wasn't.

@Dreammouse I'm not looking after my child for a portion of the day?

OP posts:
MotionIntheOcean · 02/02/2025 10:06

StormyPotatoes · 02/02/2025 09:56

If you, someone who wasn’t my manager, starting quizzing my on my childcare (and in a meeting in front of several other men), I would absolutely report you to HR.

Edited

Yes, genuinely what the fuck? Boundaries!

NetZeroZealot · 02/02/2025 10:07

Soontobe60 · 02/02/2025 09:44

What part of it is ridiculous?

The part which says if a child is young enough to need collecting they need childcare too.

JMAngel1 · 02/02/2025 10:10

NetZeroZealot · 02/02/2025 10:07

The part which says if a child is young enough to need collecting they need childcare too.

This.

The main issue is that before covid every other mother or father had to work part time hours in order to be able to drop off/pick up from school. Now with WFH, parents can work full time but essentially only actually working part time. It’s theft and any manager is within their rights to question it.

DeepFatFried · 02/02/2025 10:10

It’s very hard for managers and work teams when half are taking an actual lunch break, and half are taking a school run break.

Dreammouse · 02/02/2025 10:12

gocompare · 02/02/2025 10:06

@Dreammouse I'm not looking after my child for a portion of the day?

Of course you are, even if you're not actively having to engage with them, keep an eye on them, spoon feed them evidently they are at home when you are working past pick up ergo your attention is more divided than when they're not in the house.

HoraceCope · 02/02/2025 10:13

my male boss does this,
pops out for the school run at a certain time every day,
always has

StillTryingToKeepGoing · 02/02/2025 10:13

Be interesting to see some research about what the impact is on primary children who come home to a house where parents are WFH, and whether that is generally better or not for them than going into a childcare setting. Lots of challenging behaviour in schools, lots of mental health issues with children, lots of absence on Fridays (duvet days). But obviously not clear whether long term, being at home with parents who are working is better or worse for children. Old school (1960s) kids were just left alone to get on with it - but didn’t all the kids play out ? Can imagine some love being at home and prefer that to childcare. (Just wondering aloud and not suggesting I know the answer !)

MonkeyToHeaven · 02/02/2025 10:15

You're probably not. In my experience men get more leeway for child related commitments, I know I did. That's working at a University where you'd think they might be a tad more enlightened.

Dreammouse · 02/02/2025 10:16

MonkeyToHeaven · 02/02/2025 10:15

You're probably not. In my experience men get more leeway for child related commitments, I know I did. That's working at a University where you'd think they might be a tad more enlightened.

Is this serious?

Greenkindness · 02/02/2025 10:17

JMAngel1 · 02/02/2025 09:58

From reading this I think Trump might be right (something I never thought I’d say!). How old are your children? You say it’s 45 minutes max a day to do both runs but what do you do when you all get home? Do you have someone else to mind them whilst you can go straight back to work with full attention? When I bring mine back home, there’s always drinks/snacks to sort out, big chats on what happened that day, homework to sort out/supervise, fights to break up. There is no way I could work properly so in theory one might actually be clocking off at 3pm. I can kind of see why employers might be funny about school run breaks as it’s probably not just the time to do the physical run but all the extra stuff involved too.

What do you mean by Trump might be right, sorry I don’t follow?

MotionIntheOcean · 02/02/2025 10:17

StillTryingToKeepGoing · 02/02/2025 10:13

Be interesting to see some research about what the impact is on primary children who come home to a house where parents are WFH, and whether that is generally better or not for them than going into a childcare setting. Lots of challenging behaviour in schools, lots of mental health issues with children, lots of absence on Fridays (duvet days). But obviously not clear whether long term, being at home with parents who are working is better or worse for children. Old school (1960s) kids were just left alone to get on with it - but didn’t all the kids play out ? Can imagine some love being at home and prefer that to childcare. (Just wondering aloud and not suggesting I know the answer !)

It would likely need to factor in that there may not actually be a childcare setting available, too. I'd expect that parents who've essentially been forced to do this would probably differ from those who had multiple options and felt this was the best one.

Flossflower · 02/02/2025 10:17

I think by arranging a meeting at 3:00 they were probably fed up with you not being there at important times.
Years ago, we had a problem with someone always being late back from lunch so arranged our meetings straight after lunch.
Even if you have agreed this with your manager, you should still let people you work with know your hours so they know when they can contact you.

babyproblems · 02/02/2025 10:18

I think you need to make it formal. You’re on thin ice with an informal agreement. It obviously does impact your working day as most people are available at 3pm and your colleagues obviously are having to work around it. I agree it’s crappy from them but realistically you need a formal agreement that this is ok and this will continue. Otherwise I think you’re asking for trouble..

JimHalpertsWife · 02/02/2025 10:18

JMAngel1 · 02/02/2025 10:10

This.

The main issue is that before covid every other mother or father had to work part time hours in order to be able to drop off/pick up from school. Now with WFH, parents can work full time but essentially only actually working part time. It’s theft and any manager is within their rights to question it.

How is a ft wfh parent working part time? I work a minimum of 37 hours a week, am at least as productive as I was when office based and only leave my desk to refill my coffee cup or take my allocated 30mins break at 3pm.

During the hour my child is home from school and I work, they watch TV or play their computer game. I work in a separate room at that time. I do not work pt.

MonkeyToHeaven · 02/02/2025 10:18

Dreammouse · 02/02/2025 10:16

Is this serious?

Absolutely.

RosesAndHellebores · 02/02/2025 10:19

These arrangements create difficulties. It deoendsnon the role and if senior there are issues because 2pm to 5pm is generally regarded as full-time working hours. It makes co-ordinating meetings difficult when several parties are involved and can create operational difficulties for the business when delays arise.

I'm on the fence here. On the one hand it's reasonable flexible working but on the other it is also reasonable to decline such arrangements if there is an operational detriment.

Bromptotoo · 02/02/2025 10:21

Hwi · 02/02/2025 09:52

Amazing to have a job where you tell senior management when you are available for meetings. What the f have I been doing wrong all my life?

If a meeting is being organised then anywhere I've worked it's arranged by offering a time slot or slots and ensuring everybody is available. If x says there's a segment of the day where they've another commitment then the meetings arranged around that.

If there are businesses where meetings are called on a dictate/comply basis then they need to move into the 21st century.

If I had a staff member request a 'reasonable adjustment' for the school run I'd be ensuring I could agree not looking for reasons why not.

Dbank · 02/02/2025 10:22

I think you're being over sensitive, he assumed and asked you something and he was correct, end of.

SoapySponge · 02/02/2025 10:22

It was a simple statement of fact. I really don't understand the issue here?

Lostworlds · 02/02/2025 10:23

I think you’re overthinking as you’re worried somethings going to be said.
If things have been in place for you to do the school run for years and your own boss is okay with it then I wouldn’t worry too much.
The other boss said it sounds like the school run which it is. He doesn’t know your agreement with your boss and is only trying to schedule meetings that work for everyone.

I would let it go and try not to think about it.

MadamePeriwinkle · 02/02/2025 10:23

I get why you feel off about it...

I assume if anyone else said they couldn't do a specific time, he didn't question them as to why?

And the others were all men?

I'd leave it for now but be very much on the alert for similar behaviour from this guy...

MarzipanAndFrenchFancies · 02/02/2025 10:24

babyproblems · 02/02/2025 10:18

I think you need to make it formal. You’re on thin ice with an informal agreement. It obviously does impact your working day as most people are available at 3pm and your colleagues obviously are having to work around it. I agree it’s crappy from them but realistically you need a formal agreement that this is ok and this will continue. Otherwise I think you’re asking for trouble..

Yep. I agree with this. I am afraid the tide is turning on this sort of informal flexibility. I would put in a flexible working request.

Pretty crap of the male colleague to raise it in a Teams meeting.

ZippyDoodle · 02/02/2025 10:24

If it's your lunch hour and it's agreed then you should have just said yes.

Fuck me, why can't women communicate directly? It's not difficult.

Swipe left for the next trending thread