Agree. I often wonder why they didn't do this ages ago. Is there something big stopping them or is it that the LGBs will be tarred as anti trans and be prosecuted for discrimination, or whatever other Sword of Damocles that Stonewall has over their heads.
On what grounds would a split be against the Equality laws and be considered discrimination though? age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation?
The obvious one is gender reassignment. But if anyone can pay a few quid to get a GRC without reassignment, what is it all about? Maybe trans and Q++ are new religions and beliefs - that's a possibility I suppose - or something.
I often wonder what the reason is for them sticking together. Maybe I am just not familiar enough with such things and my apologies if I am not up to speed on the Equality legislation, or the reasons for LGBTQ++ or if I have offended anyone.