Similar issues:
Was sexual harassment in the workplace legal in the 1990s?
No it wasn't. So yes it's potentially still an issue.
Who is liable for this:
Ultimately the employer. Therefore Evans own media company and by extension C4.
Different issues:
When did this occur and is it ongoing?
The relevance of this is the whole 'lessons learned' mantra of the BBC and other media employers.
The BBC has to demonstrate that it CURRENTLY operates within the law and is accountable because, the licence fee.
Wallace is current and post a billion scandals. Evans seems to predate that.
So whilst I do think Evans behaviour WAS potentially problematic and perhaps there is something there, the bigger issue is it ongoing and is that work culture still being deemed ok by the likes of C4 and the BBC. It's about them as organisations as much as it is about individuals. It's the whole 'everyone knew' issue.
If Evans no longer is behaving in that manner thats different to someone still working and doing it. Because ongoing liability and accountability.
I note the allegations against Brand were strong enough to go to the police with and were part of an ongoing pattern.
Also the allegations against Wallace are not simply banter. People seem to be illiterate in understanding this though. There were pages on MN ignoring this 'minor' point yesterday.
I think I'm now up to counting five allegations of potential sexual assault and two of indecency as well as the more general complaint of sexual harassment. This morning it's being reported that he apparently had the nickname 'Dirk' on set after fictional porn star Dirk Diggler. And theres a massive paper trial of complaints that have seemingly been ignored. Wallace has been officially warned previously too and several of these complaints post date that.
That's a current institutional failure after the BBC said they would review historic complaints and the complaints system.
These differences are important to know and understand.