Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Southport - why do they keep saying a ‘Taylor Swift themed club’?

704 replies

SandrasNewDo · 30/07/2024 08:35

It’s really bothering me.

Is it because
a) the murder of 2 children and attempted murder and severe injury of 9 others isn’t newsworthy enough without involving Taylor Swift’s name?

b) Taylor Swift needs to suffer some guilt by association in the way Ariana Grande did with the bombing at her concert?

What’s the need or relevance? If it had been a 80’s music dance class would they keep saying that? Why not just say summer dance club and then focus on the children and adults who were hurt or killed - I can’t even imagine the devastation their families and the whole community must be suffering.

Anyone?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Creepingivy · 30/07/2024 12:56

Why do they say it's not a terror attack? It's a mass stabbing in which three innocent little girls lost their lives.
I'm sick of the media & police calling these "isolated incidents" or "not terror related" or "lone wolf attacks".. It is not good enough.
The leader up showed the murderer actively sought the venue out, took a taxi there (which he refused to pay for) & intentionally targeted little girls enjoying their Taylor Swift summer camp. This mass stabbing was pre meditated & should be treated as an act of terror.

Inlaw · 30/07/2024 12:56

Rosscameasdoody · 30/07/2024 12:53

Looking at this post I don’t think I’m the one with the problem to be honest. You asked a question, I answered it. As did other posters. Several times. And the age of criminal responsibility in the UK is 10. That’s the age at which children can be held legally responsible for their criminal actions. The international recommendation is 12, so we could be considered to be harsh in that respect. At 17 the brain is still not fully developed, which is why 17 is still considered to be a minor. At no point did I describe the perpetrator as a child.

At no point did I describe the perpetrator as a child.

You’re the one who keeps quoting me. And you don’t even disagree. So leave me alone please.

Caramelbuttonsandalatte · 30/07/2024 12:57

At 17 he will be probably very much physically a man, in term of brain development not an adult, in legal terms he’s under 18 so not an adult but is above the age of criminal responsibility which is 10. It’s very very early days in the investigation and the police will release information as and when they feel it is appropriate and the courts may rule he can be identified, we just don’t know yet and it needs for the legal route to be followed.

Creepingivy · 30/07/2024 12:57

MaidOfAle · 30/07/2024 12:49

He can't marry until he's 18, even with parental consent, because the minimum marriage age was raised in 2022.

He can't vote. He can't buy a pint. He can't buy a vape device or a packet of fags. He can't own property, he can't take out a loan.

He's a minor.

He's a murderer.

FiddlyDiddlyDee · 30/07/2024 12:58

Inlaw · 30/07/2024 12:46

What is your problem! What is it that I have said that has upset you?

All I have said is he’s not a child.

Which he isn’t. The law does not say a 17yo is a child. Because that would mean we have child labour and child soldiers in the U.K. A child and a minor are not interchangeable words.

What is the purpose of this conversation? You think he’s a child? Great. I think you’re wrong. Get over it.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) defines a child as anyone under the age of 18

This a legally-binding international agreement used in UK case law

That's a lot stronger than inlaw on mumsnet's definition of a child isn't it?

Caramelbuttonsandalatte · 30/07/2024 12:58

Creepingivy · 30/07/2024 12:56

Why do they say it's not a terror attack? It's a mass stabbing in which three innocent little girls lost their lives.
I'm sick of the media & police calling these "isolated incidents" or "not terror related" or "lone wolf attacks".. It is not good enough.
The leader up showed the murderer actively sought the venue out, took a taxi there (which he refused to pay for) & intentionally targeted little girls enjoying their Taylor Swift summer camp. This mass stabbing was pre meditated & should be treated as an act of terror.

I think because for the legal definition to be terror attack an individual has to be known to be affiliated with a recognised terror group and currently there is no evidence of that

ErrolTheDragon · 30/07/2024 12:58

There's certainly no point in speculation at this point.
However, his motivation may not be irrelevant, if he's been in any way influenced by anyone else IRL or online. I'm sure the police will be investigating this in great depth.

Creepingivy · 30/07/2024 12:59

ErrolTheDragon · 30/07/2024 12:58

There's certainly no point in speculation at this point.
However, his motivation may not be irrelevant, if he's been in any way influenced by anyone else IRL or online. I'm sure the police will be investigating this in great depth.

Were more involved in the background with him?

ElleintheWoods · 30/07/2024 13:00

Because they want to paint a picture. A bit like every investigative story into something horrific happening somewhere starts with describing it as a tranquil, quiet place and adding some relatable detail to create an emotional connection and the effect of shock in the audience.

It’s a journalistic technique.

Rosscameasdoody · 30/07/2024 13:00

wateringcanface · 30/07/2024 12:55

I hope taylor swift has no guilt, all she is responsible for is being the source of happiness and fun for young girls.

However, it is relevant her name is mentioned. This evil boy targeted this event. He targeted an event where young girls are celebrating and enjoying female empowerment. The motivation being the belief that young girls who are having fun and celebrating a successful woman deserve to be murdered, is very very important. Its all I will think about now every time I see a bitter bloke on Instagram, twitter etc mocking Taylor, its that hatred of women, that causes events like this.

Taylor Swift posted this on Instagram today

Sassenach85 · 30/07/2024 13:01

I don’t understand the focus on the murderer …. Little girls made bracelets to share with family they will never see again, dance moves to show Mummy…and they died in a terrifying horrific way that should stop us all in our tracks. Such overwhelming sadness - and loss

Inlaw · 30/07/2024 13:01

FiddlyDiddlyDee · 30/07/2024 12:58

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) defines a child as anyone under the age of 18

This a legally-binding international agreement used in UK case law

That's a lot stronger than inlaw on mumsnet's definition of a child isn't it?

Looking forward to that UN court case about our child soldiers and child labour then. Let me know how it goes.

BeachRide · 30/07/2024 13:03

Ellerby83 · 30/07/2024 08:43

I think it's relevant. Who would be at at Taylor Swift themed event - girls. He was deliberately targeting girls.

It's funny how these 'mental health' cases never get the urge to attack a gym full of athletic, capable men and women, isn't it?

Creepingivy · 30/07/2024 13:07

So many incels hate the idea of strong women like Taylor Swift empowering girls & women.

Hate seeing girls have a strong female role model.

I'm glad the media is highlighting the fact the mass stabbing took place at a Taylor themed event as it will resonate with most most humans that young, innocent, defenceless little girls were vitcims of a mass stabbing & 3 little girls aged 6, 7 & 9 were brutally murdered.

FiddlyDiddlyDee · 30/07/2024 13:08

Inlaw · 30/07/2024 13:01

Looking forward to that UN court case about our child soldiers and child labour then. Let me know how it goes.

Why would there be a court case? They're in army training college between 16-18, they're not working as soliders.

lemoniessie · 30/07/2024 13:13

BeachRide · 30/07/2024 13:03

It's funny how these 'mental health' cases never get the urge to attack a gym full of athletic, capable men and women, isn't it?

We actually had a man doing exactly that here. He killed a random man.

percypal · 30/07/2024 13:14

Last time I heard it on the radio it was ‘inspired by the music of TS’ so I wonder if her lawyers have been in touch.

CaveMum · 30/07/2024 13:16

Caramelbuttonsandalatte · 30/07/2024 12:58

I think because for the legal definition to be terror attack an individual has to be known to be affiliated with a recognised terror group and currently there is no evidence of that

My understanding is that they don’t have to be affiliated with a recognised group, they just have to subscribe to a particular ideology as a motivating factor. To me incels fit this description as they are motivated by an ideology that demonises women and girls.

MaidOfAle · 30/07/2024 13:18

Creepingivy · 30/07/2024 12:56

Why do they say it's not a terror attack? It's a mass stabbing in which three innocent little girls lost their lives.
I'm sick of the media & police calling these "isolated incidents" or "not terror related" or "lone wolf attacks".. It is not good enough.
The leader up showed the murderer actively sought the venue out, took a taxi there (which he refused to pay for) & intentionally targeted little girls enjoying their Taylor Swift summer camp. This mass stabbing was pre meditated & should be treated as an act of terror.

What they mean is "the IRA and Red Hand Commando and ISIL and Al-Qaeda and groups like that were not involved".

I agree that targeted killings of women and girls should be considered terrorist acts. But right now, they aren't.

Goldenbear · 30/07/2024 13:18

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

MaidOfAle · 30/07/2024 13:18

Creepingivy · 30/07/2024 12:57

He's a murderer.

No, he's not: he's a murder suspect. As were James Bulger's killers, who also were anonymous until after conviction.

Cattery · 30/07/2024 13:20

At 17 he’s old enough to make his own decisions and he made the decision to take that taxi purposely to harm little kids. He’s a terrorist and a murderer. Shame the police didn’t shoot him

WeatherNanna · 30/07/2024 13:20

FiddlyDiddlyDee · 30/07/2024 12:58

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) defines a child as anyone under the age of 18

This a legally-binding international agreement used in UK case law

That's a lot stronger than inlaw on mumsnet's definition of a child isn't it?

As @Creepingivy says, he's a murderer, who slaughtered innocent girls and women. 6, 7 and 9 year old girls were murdered in a frenzy by this evil monster.

Legally he may be a minor, lucky for him as he probably won't get the punishment he deserves. That'sshame.

OldCrocks · 30/07/2024 13:21

I noticed the TS angle being reported repeatedly too. Tbh, it hadn't occurred to me til this thread that it might have been a relevant factor, i.e. the deliberate targeting of girls and the incel connection. The sooner misogyny is explicitly defined as a hate crime the better imo.

Creepingivy · 30/07/2024 13:22

MaidOfAle · 30/07/2024 13:18

No, he's not: he's a murder suspect. As were James Bulger's killers, who also were anonymous until after conviction.

Edited

Nope. This male murdered 3 children in a frenzied, pre-meditated mass stabbing. This makes him a murderer based on his evil, murderous actions.

Swipe left for the next trending thread