OK-Join me in a "Who will lose their job first?" poll

[CurlewKate]

And how soon" competition.

My money's on David Lammy by February.

my very, very big standard comp taught all 3 sciences too. Maybe independents aren’t all that if this thread is to be believed about curriculum.

What’s because of that? Not Rayner for a start, she’s in an elected post.
He doesn't anyway. Insisting on discipline isn’t the same as wanting puppets. It just means you keep the debate within cabinet and once a line is agreed you play as a team.

That poster was attempting to exonerate the Tory government by blaming the chaos of the last 14 years on devolved governments. It was a painful process convincing them that most funding and its allocation originates in Westminster and there’s no devolved government to blame in England.

What errors do you think he made? I can only think of one (not contacting Rwanda ahead of cancelling the ‘plan’ - and I can’t find much corroboration that actually happened, just Rory Stewart said so).

Not completely, no. It can use what money it is given for its own priorities but it is dependent on Westminster for the funding. It also helps if the PM engages constructively with the FMs, which Johnson, in particular, totally failed to do.

No, she wasn’t trying to “exonerate” any party or interest - as far as I understand her comments: she was just pointing out that significant national control by parties other than the Conservatives hasn’t been a great success.

Westminster funding matters, of course, but since ex-England UK funding is relatively generous it’s difficult to see what your point can be.

He's not thick. He is ultra-left and subscribes to all manner of SJW thinking. So I'd have thought a strange choice for Foreign Sec. We will see.

My point is perfectly clear to anyone who’s not determined not to see it. You probably haven’t seen yesterday’s discussion. It was on a different thread.

Explain your point Blossom? I'm guessing that I'm that poster, so if you explain your point more clearly I'll do the same and then we'll both understand each other.

Or do you actually just think they aren’t posh enough? We need to understand what is meant by “just not right.”

We did it all yesterday. There’s zero point in going through it all again. If you need reminding I’m sure you can find the posts.

Did they not think girls might go into medicine or biomedical research?

Oh I can find the posts I wrote - it's just that you seem unclear so I was going to explain it to you another way.

Actually, I'll just repeat what @FinalCeleryScheme said as it summarises waht I said perfectly - "No, she wasn’t trying to “exonerate” any party or interest - as far as I understand her comments: she was just pointing out that significant national control by parties other than the Conservatives hasn’t been a great success"

Don’t try to patronise me. You lost the argument completely yesterday because your logic is flawed.

I know who I'd rather be a bunker with.

No-one is attempting to patronise you Blossom, don't be silly. Hopefully @FinalCeleryScheme's summary of my posts clarifies things now?

But Jeremy Corbyn.

You lost, get over it?

Oh dear.

Indeed.

Sorry, I thought that was the accepted line for griping. Along with get behind the government to make Britain Great again

🙄

Re the actual thread, a potential candidate in the making?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13628999/Newly-elected-Reform-MP-James-McMurdock-jailed-attacking-ex-girlfriend-outside-nightclub-victims-mother-slams-monster-not-representing-people.html

Let’s hope so