Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Another XL Bully has killed a woman

332 replies

hollyblueivy · 21/05/2024 07:09

Hornchurch: Woman dies in XL bully attack at home www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-69041493

She was the owner and sounds like she had a couple of them. They were registered but clearly that doesn't and didn't stop this preventable death.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
Shonla · 21/05/2024 08:51

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. People die doing idiotic things all the time.

What I would like to see is a ban on these dogs being around children, including in the home. Adults can make their own decisions about risk but children can’t.

fieldsofbutterflies · 21/05/2024 08:51

Deadringer · 21/05/2024 08:48

They should all be put down. Can that fucker who sold all those descendants of killer Kimbo not be held to account, and every other breeder who is knowingly profiting from the sale of these dogs.

The problem is that breeding them was legal at the time - you can't charge someone for breaking a law that didn't exist.

JohnofWessex · 21/05/2024 08:53

I suggest that the real solution is proper dog (and horse) licensing.

While there is a lot of emphasis on the dog, all to often its the owner that needs to be muzzled and neutered.

I suggest that a lot more needs to be done with the owners of problem dogs as they are clearly not right and I suggest that if your dog ccauses problems you will experience a massive PITA response would be a major deterrent to problem dog owners

Cuppachuchu · 21/05/2024 08:55

There is one of these living down the road from me, I met it being walked by a dog walker, young woman. It was muzzled and she stopped to talk to me. It is only 14 wks old but already head and shoulders bigger than my adult cockapoo. He's very friendly and soft. For the first time he walked behind me and stayed behind my legs. Normally allover other dogs wanting to play. Not this one.

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 21/05/2024 08:59

Shonla · 21/05/2024 08:51

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. People die doing idiotic things all the time.

What I would like to see is a ban on these dogs being around children, including in the home. Adults can make their own decisions about risk but children can’t.

Completely agree.

LakeTiticaca · 21/05/2024 09:02

Cocopogo · 21/05/2024 08:29

No not all.

I had a client who begged the police to take her dog because she knew it was dangerous and she had a toddler and new born in the house and they wouldn’t help her. It took months of contacting charities etc until the money was raised to get it to the vet to be pts.

Yes it's always others that end up having to pay for the stupidity of some people

Cocopogo · 21/05/2024 09:03

Trixiefirecracker · 21/05/2024 08:37

Sorry, but she shouldn’t t have had the dog in the first place if she couldn’t afford vet bills.

Totally agree. But I think that’s the very nature of a lot of owners of this type of dog. Young uns without a clue wanting to look hard.

Isitchill · 21/05/2024 09:14

hollyblueivy · 21/05/2024 07:21

Hopefully a few more owners will think twice about their decision now.

I doubt XL bully owners think full stop I'm afraid.

QueenCarrot · 21/05/2024 09:22

JohnofWessex · 21/05/2024 08:53

I suggest that the real solution is proper dog (and horse) licensing.

While there is a lot of emphasis on the dog, all to often its the owner that needs to be muzzled and neutered.

I suggest that a lot more needs to be done with the owners of problem dogs as they are clearly not right and I suggest that if your dog ccauses problems you will experience a massive PITA response would be a major deterrent to problem dog owners

Agree about dog licensing. Which should include mandatory neutering except for licensed breeders. Breeding should be strictly controlled to ensure no inbreeding and no selecting for harmful traits (flat faces, sloping backs etc)

thecatsthecats · 21/05/2024 09:32

I've noticed more (unmuzzled) XL bullies in my local park since the ban came in (which is usually much more dachshund territory). I think owners are avoiding their own local areas where they are known and can be named to police.

On another note, BIL and SIL have just adopted a lockdown reject rottweiler, putting themselves on the no-visit list since we have a grabby and hyperactive seven month old. (They're welcome here without the dog)

My husband was miffed when I said this after meeting them and finding out they had the dog. The will to think "it won't happen to us" is strong...

Westfacing · 21/05/2024 09:33

Like a lot of problems in society there is a lack of political will to effectively deal with these types of dogs. Obviously they can't all be PTS but there should be a draconian ban on unlicensed breeding of any dog, not just XLs. There are more than enough dogs in the country, many of them owned by idiots.

It must be a nightmare to live next door to such people and their vicious dogs.

CoffeeAndPeanuts · 21/05/2024 09:38

YellowHairband · 21/05/2024 07:33

They won't.

What I really don't understand about the law is that it obviously recognises the dangers posed, and so requires them to be on leads outside the home. But inside the home obviously they don't have to be, and yet they can still be kept in homes with children. How can you say "the dangers are such that out and about the dogs need to be kept on a lead, but also it's absolutely fine to own one of these while you have children living in the house".

@YellowHairband

personal choice
personal responsibility

how much govt legislation do you want in your own home? It's a slippery slope.

Hoppinggreen · 21/05/2024 09:39

My sympathy is for the poor lady and her family, its absolutely horific.
A lot of these owners are absolutely deluded though - there was a news segmant featuring a lady who was complaining about the new legislation around these dogs and while the reporters were quite fair it was very obvious that the lady couldn't control her "big softy" and after the segment the reporter said that just after the cameras stopped the dog tried to attack th camera man.
I have a large breed but they are known for being very good family dogs and rarely if ever feature in attacks but I know he has teeth and claws the same as a dog that is generally seen to be "scary" and we always treat that with respect.

Willmafrockfit · 21/05/2024 09:40

how easy is it to become a licensed breeder though,
you can still breed a bad dog

EasternStandard · 21/05/2024 09:43

She decided to keep the dangerous dogs which may as well be a weapon

Tg no children or passerby were involved

YellowHairband · 21/05/2024 09:45

personal choice
personal responsibility

It's not the child's choice though, is it?

And no one considers it a parent's "personal choice" to not put their child in a car seat or do up their seatbelt.
I don't think these dogs belong in houses with children.

Allthehorsesintheworld · 21/05/2024 09:45

Cocopogo · 21/05/2024 08:29

No not all.

I had a client who begged the police to take her dog because she knew it was dangerous and she had a toddler and new born in the house and they wouldn’t help her. It took months of contacting charities etc until the money was raised to get it to the vet to be pts.

This shows the mentality of the owners though.
Dogs are expensive to care for properly. If the owner didn’t have the money to have her dog put down then she shouldn’t have owned a dog, any dog.

CoffeeAndPeanuts · 21/05/2024 09:46

Cocopogo · 21/05/2024 08:29

No not all.

I had a client who begged the police to take her dog because she knew it was dangerous and she had a toddler and new born in the house and they wouldn’t help her. It took months of contacting charities etc until the money was raised to get it to the vet to be pts.

@Cocopogo

its a worry for the children's sake it wasn't removed immediately, but why did she expect it to be euthanised for free, where was her responsibility in this??

wetotter · 21/05/2024 09:46

I'd wondered before about there being a rage syndrome in these dogs. But was told by other posters there was no such thing in this breed.

But I can't quite let go of the idea, because it fits the pattern of attacks (previously calm, and then just turning without warning) and goes with the appalling level of in-breeding.

Willmafrockfit · 21/05/2024 09:47

were people expected to pay for euthanasia?

EasternStandard · 21/05/2024 09:47

CoffeeAndPeanuts · 21/05/2024 09:38

@YellowHairband

personal choice
personal responsibility

how much govt legislation do you want in your own home? It's a slippery slope.

I’d go with making sure children have a better chance in their homes by legislating against it

We do many laws like that

CoffeeAndPeanuts · 21/05/2024 09:50

Standingupstandingout · 21/05/2024 08:32

There's one that must live near me as I've seen it a few times now. It is dog reactive so when it sees my dog it goes absolutely ballistic. The woman walking it is slim and I do worry that her weight/strength isn't enough to anchor it while it's trying to get to my dog. To make it worse, the woman carries its muzzle in her hand. Not much good if it's not wearing the bloody thing.

@Standingupstandingout

have you reported her?

do you have a car? I'd be taking my dog elsewhere to walk. On the bus if no car, I wouldn't walk around there until the XL had gone.

MistyRoseBlue · 21/05/2024 09:53

Longdueachange · 21/05/2024 07:13

Most XL Bullies that have killed are a genetic link to a stud called Killer Kimbo. Killer Kimbo was a result of a sibling mating, and throws the sudden rage gene desired by the fighting community that these dogs were bred for. Owners need to check through breeding lines ro make sure their dog isn't from this line. The sudden rage gene is what makes then dangerous, as it mean that your beloved dog can switch without provocation, and I've seen this happen first hand.
And to be cold, as least it was her that was killed by her dogs, not an outsider, which means the legislation is working.

Edited

Omg there are some evil people around

CoffeeAndPeanuts · 21/05/2024 09:53

ChampagneGold · 21/05/2024 08:26

And because we live in such a weak, ineffective country, the dogs probably won't be destroyed. They were 'removed' from the site apparently. Why not shoot them ffs and be done with it? No doubt some do gooder rescue will try and rehabilitate them.

Also, I read there are 3 (probably rough arse women) currently campaigning for the law banning them to be overturned.

There should never have been an amnesty on these things. They should have been culled on mass.

@ChampagneGold

im pretty sure they can't be rehomed in any situation, so I have no doubt they'll be killed, it was probably done this way to avoid some further trauma to the family (neighbours etc)

DazedNotConfused1 · 21/05/2024 09:55

Urgh wish they’d just kill the entire breed.

Swipe left for the next trending thread