Who do you think is the BBC presenter who has been suspended?

[broomers]

I don't have twitter and haven't seen any theories as to who it is, I'm presuming a man due to the figure outline being used in the press:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-66140356.amp

It's a bit confusing as somebody has only just tweeted the press piece about Myleene replacing him on C5 (slightly dramatic language, rather than 'standing in for') - but that was the other week and he's been back on since.

So was the victim female after all, then?

No idea if it's JV or someone else. But I will note that his usually very active Twitter - multiple posts per day - has been notably quiet for the past two days.

They might not say until Monday morning 🤷‍♀️ if they suddenly announced it now it would make him look like the guilty person even if he isn't. He's usually very active on Twitter so I would expect him to do what Rylan has done and post that it's not him to be honest.

Maybe she thinks she’s got nothing to lose now as she’s not had any currency for years. I don’t think she even has a job these days so maybe not that shrewd.

There are a lot of nonces in the media 🤮

JV said recently he was thinking of coming off Twitter.

Absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence.

JV

Not even if I was desperate

No! That seems ridiculous. I'd be gutted.

@Southeastdweller she would be sued for millions though. I'm actually hoping it's not him. I can't stand his lecturing but he presents himself as such wholesome family man. But then so did Phillip Schofield.
Christ alive how many more presenters have been hood winking us. So depressing really.

That pic has to be generic, otherwise it reminds me of a catalogue my mum had years ago

I hope it's noone that spoke out badly against Mr Schofield, hypocrites

It’s not JV.

Of course they did. In their version of reality. Because the Sun gutter press would be the first place anyone would think of going. If not the first, the second. Or the third. You wouldn't go to the police, would you? Or to, I don't know, a vaguely "not the gutter press" type of paper. Money isn't the only form of payment, and nor does one story preclude the later "exclusives".

This is exactly who the outline looks like. So much so that if I were him, and it's not actually me who did this, I'd be suing the DM.

If you watch the video though she is very careful with her wording. She says things like it would be ridiculous to talk about JV in the same breathe as Scofield.

JV is still using Twitter, btw. This morning, he replied to a few tweets.

I'd be doing a Rylan if I was him and I wasn't the presenter in question.
He must have seen his name all over twitter.

🤣 I saw the Katy Hopkins thing on Twitter, not TikTok - but it was a TikTok link!

I've never recovered over Harris as I liked the tv show Animal Hospital that he presented on the bbc in the 90s and he seemed genuine. How wrong we all were.
It's deeply depressing that some people are like this. It's just horrible. I feel for the victims who are usually young and easy to groom and they can weald their money and power to do it as well. Awful.

why can’t people learn and not name names or initials

Precisely Kitty.

why can’t people learn and not name names or initials

Exactly. No one knows and the amount of times that a Twitter firestorm has been wrong is legendary.

If you are identifying people, you are making a defamatory statement about that person which is legally actionable if it is not true.

Speculation about identity is very very unwise.