I found your post self-contradictory, @SausageCat47.
You said "the focus on penises as a source of rape and focus on trans issues as misdirection from structural misogyny" and "issues relating to serious cases of sexual violence to misconduct, are never really discussed and increased focus on ‘men in changing rooms’ seems odd."
Rape, sexual predation & molestation are expressions of structural misogyny. So are "trans women's" ideas about what women are: it's all stereotyped femininity and sexual fetishisation. Not many of the men claiming to be women rush do all the unpaid, uncredited drudge & support work that falls on women, keep quiet when the males are talking, and accept 27% less pay!
Some old-school "trans women" do comprehend the real differences between female & male, know who and what they are, and even have a genuine interest in feminist issues. They are the few we didn't really have a problem with when they wanted to do their makeup in the ladies' loos. They would never intrude on women's rape survival groups, for instance, or fake being female in order to poke women's sex organs at a medical examination. There was what could best be called reserved tolerance on both sides.
The explosion in trans activism and all things "transgender" has ruined all that.
Feminism is grounded in a belief that women are fully functional, autonomous human beings just as men are, with different biology and, consequently, some different priorities. It isn't complicated. Neither is the glaringly obvious fact that gender is a set of social stereotypes attached to each sex, which is used to constrain the behaviours of both sexes and is taken to be a natural value system: one that down-values females and treats them as playthings or servants.
This is your structural misogyny. Women are oppressed because of our sex; gender is the justification for that oppression. Feminists therefore dissent to gender systems. I'm surprised you don't see the dots connecting?