Unfortunately the WHO have themselves caved in to politics on that now and there is no evidence that it is actually nearing its end - in fact they didn't even say this, it was conditional on what likely won't happen. The virus isn't being acted upon now by removing measures in many countries and just trying vaccination constantly and now this 'interesting' somewhat amusing for all the wrong reasons concept of "vaccine fatigue". Seems people can't even handle this - I know, I felt like a guinea pig myself on my third jab, as that is the only answer they keep giving to everything, just keeping trying to vaccinate our way out of the pandemic and never ever actually achieve it, instead the self-defeating "living with Covid" approach which is now clear is giving the virus evolution the edge and putting our vaccines farther behind than any action in these countries to do so. The measures being removed are done on the basis of no science, except science compromised by what people are willing to do, which isn't science but is science compromised instead, or compromised by protection of economic interests whilst the economy and economic interests are not protected by having constant burden of disease weighing down on them.
Surprise surprise the impact from causing Covid to be present at the levels we have caused is greater than they thought, the people whose previous thoughts were wrong on the matter. www.theguardian.com/business/2022/sep/30/uk-is-only-g7-country-with-smaller-economy-than-before-covid-19
It isn't what no-one else has thought of - although I have been repeatedly ahead throughout the pandemic of what our officials have said and, apart from their being correct on advising people to get their vaccines each time, they have been repeatedly wrong whilst I have been most often correct and been right on five separate times now about what this virus may be like only for scientists, different groups of scientists, to say they did not "expect" and they were "surprised" by what I expected this virus might be able to do and comes as no surprise to me that it does, seemingly because many scientists seem blinded by their knowledge into thinking this virus will behave like pre-existing ones that they have experience of, when, whilst this virus transmits pretty much like other viruses do, in so many ways it repeatedly shows us that it is completely unlike any previous virus and making the assumption that it couldn't do something is usually wrong. I can't rule out certain things therefore I do not do so and they come as no surprise to me whilst scientists are surprised. It is usually a bad thing to think the virus will turn out for the best as it repeatedly often turns out to be the opposite and repeatedly penalises those that have hope.
The attempts at elimination are not literally zero, that's where the misunderstanding sometimes is (and I've never heard our media properly explain it as opposed to being hostile against it from the start). It accepts that the virus may get back into countries again, at which point measures are then taken to get it back to zero. This saves many lives and means health services don't end up with backlogs being added to. Elimination proved to be extreme use in enabling long periods of normal life in New Zealand throughout much of the first 18 months of the pandemic, so that people didn't then suffer fatigue from extended lockdowns in countries such as ours that have pursued our flawed approach.
It is flawed, because we have had those repeated lockdowns and they have been as extended as they were and the Government caused all the damage it did by allowing the virus into the country and never getting rid of it, never having any effective border to stop it coming in, simply caused a worse virus problem by protecting the economy instead (and ultimately failing to protect the economy, by then wiping out the pub trade at Christmas for two years in a row) and never having an effective test and trace system, and as New Zealand showed whilst people say elimination can only delay the virus, the period of delay can be substantial and viruses that challenged it such as Delta would not have been created without countries like ours that enable the virus to spread until they are forced at the last moment to close the economy and cause even more damage, to the economy, people's health in terms of more having been allowed to catch Covid whilst doing nothing by trying to protect the economy and mental health from being in extended lockdowns and mental health damage to relatives or people in care homes and also including children who've lost parents whom Covid killed.
I don't wish higher levels of death and disease, unfortunately other people clearly need them in order for them to do something, I'd prefer they did it without having to see this. Every time, the hospitalisations are less than they were in the worst wave possible before. Instead, we sit and wait and need it seems more people to be hospitalised as we are just watching and never doing anything to prevent any of the waves. I know, pretty novel idea to suggest we ought to be doing something to stop these entirely foreseeable things in the first place and, through omitting to do anything, are choosing to cause extra deaths and long-term disability.
Lockdown life doesn't necessarily suit me better than normal life, both have their bad and good aspects. The normal life damage was only later on in normal life and caused by people's normal life activities not being altered despite repeated complaints from myself as to what damage they were causing. There are good aspects such as Christmas Parties as long as no-one is harassed at them that are not possible in my lockdown but it is different instead. It would be nice to be able to do normal life again but I suppose that was the period then and this is the period now and I have no view on which is better or worse than any other, my being objective as usual. Just as I wouldn't perhaps have wanted lockdown all the time, equally would anyone want to be at a Christmas Party every day of the year?
Lockdown in itself neither suits me better nor worse, some aspects are worse as it isn't plain-sailing throughout but then neither was "normal life", and I'm rather annoyed by people constantly going on about normal nowadays which is always defined to suit their interests and has its own aspects that are unnecessary pressurising or boring. By the way, I've never found myself looking at four corners in my home, there is always something to do here and I barely have time to do a lot of it. Other people may not be thinking creatively or else may find the activities in lockdown boring.
A lot of this may come from my autism, which affects different people in different ways, but some of it may not and it may be very different in general for people in lockdown that are not on the autism spectrum.