[quote Yeahthat]@WeQuestionEverything
It's not about what I want. It's about being realistic about our own capabilities, what's actually achievable, and what our core interests are.
We should have learned in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya etc that it's not possible to simply remake the world as we like it. We're not omnipotent. We're going to have to get used to that as the unipolar world under US hegemony becomes a bipolar one as China rises.
I personally believe that those who counselled against the expansion of NATO and pointed to Ukraine as a future flashpoint between Russia and the west, as far back as the 90s, have been vindicated.
My belief, as I've stated previously, is that intransigence has done nothing except create a tragedy in Ukraine.
The solution that I envision is negotiations predicated on Ukraine being offered and accepting:
Incorporation into the EU, but ruled out of any involvement in a hypothetical future EU military; accepting neutrality; ruling out (constitutionally, if need be) future incorporation into NATO and the development of nuclear weapons.
Ukraine is free to focus on becoming prosperous through economic integration into the EU.
Putin can claim that he has demilitarised Ukraine and checked NATO expansion.
Furthermore, seeking to normalise relations with Russia (which could take decades) and mutually moving towards disarmament both in conventional and nuclear weapons.[/quote]
See I don't know we'd be in a better situation.
Putin could still had ambitions of reviving Soviet Power and reclaiming the likes of Lithuania regardless.
Part of the mentality of this, isn't merely about NATO, its about loss of influence and wanting to the height of Soviet power.
He's a Megolomanic. I think its extremely naive to say its about NATO's expansion rather than fall of the Berlin Wall. He likes to push boundaries and take opportunities. If he sees a chance he will grab it even if its risky.
If it wasn't the stuff about NATO it would be something else. Because thats the mindset of dictators. Especially ones with domestic issues they are trying to paper over the cracks of.
He would still be having this crisis of mortality and wanting to secure his legacy.
Its ingrained into the personality of the man.
As much as its tempting to cling to the idea that its about NATO, I'm afraid I just don't buy it. He'd just create another narrative.
And we'd have more countries perhaps exposed and even more potential problems and not really knowing what to do.
I'm sorry, but I just can't buy into a 'grass is always greener' alternate university theory.