[quote DeliriaSkibbly]@user1641832968632486258
Unfortunately there is no 'must' about it. This is a civil case and he's under no obligation to testify, or answer any questions. The NY courts cannot exert any compulsion here and if he stays holed up (as seems likely) he's pretty much immune. He would be very ill-advised to leave the UK now in any event.
Whether that's his best course of action is another story, but we've seen thus far that he is not acting in a way that would seem to bring the best outcome for him, so I wouldn't be surprised if he did this.
Of course, the court is well able to draw it's own conclusions from such behaviour and it will go heavily against him with the judge.
If this was a criminal case, it would be a different matter entirely.[/quote]
If he refuses, then Giuffre can ask the court to decide in her favour.
My comment was based on pp's query about it having reached a point where a jury had made a decision. In order to reach that point he would have had to submit to the court's requirements to give evidence.
Of course he may refuse. But in that case the court would automatically find in Giuffre's favour and the pp's question about him being 'cleared' would not be in point.