I was on the last thread and listened to the podcast and re-watched the video.
I did not change my mind that AC deliberately chose to try and weaponise CC's race against him.
They were alone when she said she would call the police to say an African American man was threatening her.
It was not in that context a "descriptor". She knew he was black because she was looking at him and I think it's indisputable that CC was aware of his skin colour.
It was a threat, pure and simple. A threat made because she was pissed off about being challenged re: having her dog off lead in a place she shouldn't.
All this "new" information smacks of a person who's now "lawyered up" to sue her former employer and is providing "mitigation" in the form of a revisionist narrative.
As for the "Karen" argument. I'll admit I don't like the use of that name.
That said I don't think it's appropriate to derail a thread about racism with objections, especially when it's actually used in the context of the title of the podcast in question.
If you don't like this term then perhaps start a thread on that specific topic or lobby MNHQ to give/chance guidance on its usage etc etc