[quote RadandMad]@toocold54 Because kids can make silly choices for silly reasons, and come to regret it later. Adults have more life experience and a longer perspective - do you believe you could think through all the implications of a decision at age 12? We have all sorts of laws like age of consent, legal drinking age and so on for precisely these reasons.
Unless there's a compelling reason otherwise, I think kids should be looked after by both parents - children in non-divorced families don't get to choose after all. Otherwise they'll gravitate to the parent that makes their life easiest, which may not do them much good in the longer run, and especially during the teenage years.[/quote]
In fairness though, this doesn't have to be a permanent decision and OP only lives 10 mins away from where her DD will be living.
Personally, I'd look at changing the 50/50 but still having set days she needs to be at her mum's so their relationship and and her relationship with her brothers don't suffer. Eg if it's switching every couple of days then maybe look at doing one week with mum, one week with dad, or if it already is that then do the opposite and switch every couple of days.
Or alternatively OP could of course say no (and ex would need to get on board with this too), but there is a risk that her DD may be annoyed and resent her for it.
I think it would be nice of OP to say yes but equally I think she is within her rights to say no until DD is a bit older. I know that many NRP dads would not say yes to drastically cutting time with their children in this way because it would be detrimental to their relationship. Obviously it is expected at 15/16 onwards but 12 is still pretty young and I'd guess she still spends most of her time at home.
I'd probably focus on changing up the 50/50 - it may be that DD just would prefer to spend one full week somewhere before switching homes, or the opposite.