Equality for all people is simplistic.
The concept may be, the practise and how to achieve 'equality' is not simplistic at all. It involves many years of work and a deep and abiding knowledge of what the group need and how that then impacts on other groups.
Trying to justify a stance otherwise, as demonstrated here, involves trying to construct an argument reliant on redefining equality to that of Orwell's Animal Farm.
Please support this claim with evidence. I think you are adding a great deal of drama to this, but that seems to have been the style you adopted on this thread.
Can you instance clarify whether you believe that female's needs should not have the same value as transpeople's needs, please? Because that has also seemed to be the implication.
Or the accusation that I must be a man with male privilege.
Has someone said this? I must have missed it.
Alas, you're not my intended audience.
No.... your intended audience is surely the people also reading this thread. To whom you have displayed how you view reasoned discussion and the way you deal with women who disagree with you. And it seems to me, and I could be wrong here, that you are also infantilising the trans people who are reading by simply resorting to mantras and the implication that any dissent is hate.
As I have said, not very supportive. It could be said that your lack of evidence to support any of your claims should, in fact, lead all readers to question the very foundations of those claims.
To all the transgender people, as per the OP, you have my support.
And mine, and I believe nearly every single poster on the thread.