(For disclosure I'm post op transsexual with GRC)
I appreciate the many posters on this forum that have shown support.
What I would like to comment on however if I may is the idea of supporting "trans" being an all or nothing. Many transsexuals, myself included, have been accused of transphobia!!
To support "transwomen" is to support not just transsexuals but all other identities within the umbrella, most of which are self declared. As someone with a lifetime of struggles with dysphoria and dysmorphia I vehemently oppose self ID and daily see a mockery made of being transsexual.
If someone is trans then as far as I'm concerned you would NEED to have surgery. Most who are happy with "original equipment" are simply gender non confirming.
I urge people who say they support trans to consider what you mean. Do you really mean you support the whole umbrella including self ID? Or do you support those with dysphoria? Or perhaps you support transsexuals?
When you support the whole umbrella you actually support the erasure of transsexuals!
My other issue is this. Whilst I accept that biological sex is immutable, the fact if my birth as male does not mean who I am aligns to what society sees as a male gender role, nor does it mean who I am fits with male stereotypes. To acknowledge I am male far too often leads to a conclusion that this automatically makes me the enemy and makes me no different to any other man. The argument is typically that I was born male, sex is immutable, men are a danger to women, part of a damaging patriarchy therefore that means you are a danger. To grow up as transsexual (and I exclude ROGD and AGP in this) is to be despised by men, abused, sexualised and cast out.
As always I am open to giving a transsexual opinion to any questions either publicly or by PM.