I think both Harry and Meghan have been unfairly targeted, and portrayed in certain areas of the press which has influenced how the public view them. After all very few people will know them personally, and even "friend of a friend" type connections can give a distorted perception of what they are really like.
Different forms of media will always spin or twist a story to suit their own agenda or appeal to their target audience. Harry might (quite rightly) despise the british tabloid press and paparazzi photographers, but feel that with Oprah and his own tv company he can put his side of the story across in a more controlled way.
The problem is that as soon as a podcast, interview, or tv programme is "out there" any area of the media (including all the ones he hates) can see it, review it and put their own slant on it, and influence their audience. I havent heard the podcast, or seen the apple tv programme, neither am I likely to, but i could access a number of articles, like the one from The Guardian that a pp linked, for example , giving their take on it, and draw any conclusions from that.
I did see the Oprah interview and I did feel sympathy with them (although I was slightly confused about them being unable to access therapy or MH support) but while they feel that got their truth, or story out, or set the story straight, I felt like it gave loads more ammunition to the areas of the press who are already "against" them.
The Media is a huge behemoth that cant really be separated. He blames "the media" for Diana's death, and for making his and Meghans life unbearable.....but speaks to the allegedly trustworthy outlets to put his own story out....ignoring the fact that they are all part of the same machine.