This thread is totally batshit and if anyone's doing the trolling it's some of the respondents. What's the matter with people? As for this:
you’re clearly avoiding telling us what you apparently do to earn a living. Next guess is ‘it’s far too outing'.
How about it's nobody else's bloody business? Nobody has to justify their occupations online just because others demand it. Who cares about impressing a bunch of fonts?
The question in the OP wasn't about her opted response but 'how the fuck is this a category?' and I emphatically agree. The inclusion of 'house husband' on insurance documents may equalise this, but anyone with a clue knows fine well that it's very, very rare for a man to be defined in relation to his family relationships or role in relation to domestic labour. It rarely ever happens.
I think I'd be more PO'd at 'Headmaster' being the only option for a Headteacher, but 'housewife' is less anachronistic than positively antediluvian. Sounds very like the system for recording deaths until very recently. Deceased female (i.e. my mum) was listed as 'wife of X, HIS job ...' despite the fact that she had her own fucking job and was separated from a controlling husband she despised. At that point you can well dismiss it as 'didn't you have anything better to worry about?' but let me tell you it felt like the final indignity for her grieving children (also abused by our monster of a father).
It's casual, everyday sexism - sexism which seems to be happily accepted by a goodly proportion of Mumsnets membership (the ones who reply they weresooo happy to take their husbands' names (even when this wasn't the question being asked) and those who work outside the home think they're 'better' than those who don't (see upthread).
Nobody has said nor even suggested this.
I hear you, OP (although doubtless you won't be back to this thread and I can't say I blame you)!