Well I am having a right fucking tantrum a wobble this morning! I WANT TO GO SHOPPING FOR SHIT I DON'T NEED JUST FOR A CHANGE OF FUCKING SCENERY.
This talk about personally judging an acceptable level risk in interesting from the POV of a shielded person. Part of my shielding reason is fucked lungs (technical term) so I do see there is a real risk to me, and it is a worry. But I am an adult and I will stay at home because I assess the risk myself - not because I have received a letter telling me to stay indoors (in capital letters of course and three fucking letters too! )
Equally my household are being told to isolate from me if possible if they can't shield with me - well it's not possible because of space for a start, but also I am epileptic and the risk of having a seizure on my own is worse than catching CV as it's more likely IMO, and status epilepticus etc... So I am assessing the risk and acting accordingly. Which is hard because I want to go fucking shopping 
But then my risk is also affected by other people making their own assessments which is hard. If everyone else is just a stupid knob coughing over each other and no one at all washes their hands, my risk is increased. But then I can't really ask people to be responsible for my own risks because my lungs are fucked, I just have to rely on people being decent and having common sense.
But sadly some people don't have common sense and some people aren't decent (eg there was a rape and stabbing at my local rave) so does that mean there is a case for some forms of lockdowns to (I hate myself for even saying this) protect the vulnerable.
Sorry that is a bit all about me but I think it's an interesting perspective and interested in thoughts from people who actually do think for themselves but know that others don't or can't be trusted to think properly...