The thing that galls me is this:
I completely believe that where there is a real and present danger of something potentially avoidable overwhelming the health service of a nation that lockdown as a tactic of delay or suppression could work. But only for a short period to literally avoid a real and true risk of the collapse of a health service.
Tight as fuck restrictions for a fortnight, maybe a month? Yeah. Then resume as normal to allow herd immunity to actually embed whilst (narrowly) avoiding a crash.
It’s the length of time and the muddled nature of the restrictions that’s messing with the economy, society, health that’s going to leave the lasting serious damage.
So in short, to swerve total disaster, do it as a short sharp measure of national emergency. But don’t kid on that drawing it out is anything other than stalling for time to mollycoddle the fevered imagination of the masses and to allow panicked governments to take stock of the absolute fucking mess they’ve all made.
I truly think that the guy from the WHO should be in the stocks about this.