Not leaving Conservative threads alone and not leaving anti-Conservative threads alone aren't equivalent.
The Conservative Party - and therefore their voters - are in favour of the unnecessary deaths of thousands of people.
The opposition to the Conservative Party - primarily the Labour Party of the past few years, but not exclusively - are against the unnecessary deaths of thousands of people.
That's what this election was about, as far too many elections have been. And yes, the people have spoken: most believe that the unnecessary deaths of thousands of people are either a good thing, or not worth taking a few minutes to - completely anonymously - try to stop.
Of course that's horrifying. Anyone who doesn't see it as very, very bad and dangerous, whatever their personal emotional response (I completely understand being burnt out at this stage) doesn't have a fully formed and functioning conscience. The fact that that applies to so many is the point. That's how we end up with the right to the means to stay alive even being on the ballot to be voted against.
I don't have any answers to that pathology.
But out of the two moral positions represented in this election, outlined above, objecting to the latter exposes your lack of conscience, whereas anyone objecting to the former is doing the right thing, whether it's a good idea tactically or not. (I doubt it makes much difference to anyone far enough gone to be in favour of so much death, tbh.) I haven't posted on any Conservative threads on here, but I commend those who have; the idea that tit-for-tat is applicable in this situation is pure nonsense.
^
Things that shouldn't need to be spelled out, but apparently do.