*Oh yay. More arguing politicians to look forward to and making us look even more stupid than we already do.
Not really sure what it has acheived for anyone tbh, least of all Boris.*
The prorugation was pointless and antagonistic.
The court case has re established Parliamentary Sovereignty, reiterated that government must abide by the constitution and can only prorogue Parliament for particular reasons, for example, to have a new Queens Speech and introduce a new parliamentary session. Not in order to stop Parliament debating legislation. That will apply to this and any future government that decided it wanted to prorogue Parliament for weeks for no legitimate reason.
The government could not prove that they had good reason to shut down Parliament. They couldn't persuade even one senior judge that they had a legitimate reason to prorogue Parliament, so their arguments must have been astonishingly poor.